Jump to content
SAU Community

R35 Faster Than Group A R32 Gtr!


Munro
 Share

Recommended Posts

Willall Racing just ran a 1 min 12.19 at Mallala today in their JDM R35 GTR.

Faster than the group A R32 GTR!

Congratulations Keir & Martin. You guys are flying now.

E85 looks like the way to go, when are you going to fit the bigger turbos?

Wish I was there................. oh well. I will keep working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

congrats, its great that a relatively standard 35 gtr tweaked by a few cluey guys in the city of churches has outdone a 21 year old R32 with extensive race history funded by a rich tobacco company with part factory backing run by one of the best in the business :)

:laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today was one of those fruitful testing sessions where the track is 'in the slot' versus other times recently when we have been there where the drifters have convered the corners is dirt, or the supertrucks had laid diesel everywhere. No excuses today, it was a good solid fast track condition day and with plenty of time we were able to run some good data on the car and start to dial in the suspension and wing settings. Best part though is that after a couple of months working on our EVO programme I was able to get back in the chair of the GTR and have a feel of the setup....I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity of 'de-greening' the slicks in the morning session, which is kind of like trying to drive a 9 second drag car on ice.

The biggest problem the GTR faces in its current guise is that it is traction limited. Believe it or not, even with a set of new Michelin medium compound slicks on board and properly bedded in controlling wheelspin through the esses and out of turns three and five is a real problem, and one that can panic the four wheel drive electronics if not managed correctly. You really need to feed the throttle to stop the fronts and rears lighting up and pushing the car into a big sideways moment. I found this out early on in the piece when the tyres were still green. The pure raw straighline speed of the car is unnerving as it builds speed so quickly, and is stretching well into fifth gear at the braking points, as is keeping the throttle into it through the kink and the long left hander out of the nothern hairpin. Its a difficult balancing act, and one I wasnt prepared to push the limits of after the break, so 14s over the three laps I did was acceptable. The whole time you need to keep the thought that this is a 700hp+ road car chassis in the back of your head and drive accordingly. It would be interesting to take one of the 'these cars drive themselves' crew for a passenger lap for the sport of it one day. My only suggestion would be to bring an adult diaper or be prepared to pay a cleaning fee :(

'Power down' engine management settings (TPS controlled boost mapping) for corner exit speed and then adjusting the relationship between bump/rebound and tyre pressure for the varying track temperatures over the day gave us the pace increase, no magic here, just a methodical work structure of test and tune. Sensibly on fresh tyres there is no reason why we shouldnt be able to record consistent 1:10 laps in this car. That might sound a little far fetched now, but 6 months ago the idea of a 1:12 in a road car would have been bordering on unbelievable, particularly as this is a stock engine, stock turbo, stock transmission car. Some well thought out modifications, a set of slick tyres and ongoing testing and development are the keys to this cars pace :(

We have some way to go still to beat the Winfield cars by the looks of it, Skaife had it on pole there in 1991 with a 1.09 or similar. One must always have targets! However we are only 3 tenths of the outright Carerra Cup lap record to put the whole thing in perspective :nyaanyaa:

Edited by Martin Donnon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 on the brake water spray progress..

And not to cast aspersions on you and Keir's driving skills Martin, but you have to remember it was "Thee Mark Skaife" driving that R32. We need to compare apples with apples here. What additional time would him or some other professional driver well on his game be able to extract out of your R35?

Edited by fungoolie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly enough the brake cooling system raised its head in anger when I had overlooked part of my job. Essentially I didnt mark off the bottle was filled between sessions, and sure enough there was enough water surge away from the pickup of the pump to ensure that before the low level warning was on (there was still over a litre in the tank) that the car was off an into the dirt with the brake pedal on the floor. At this pace we have four laps of full stint running before we have to refill the stock washer bottle, or risk boiling the brake fluid. To give you an idea of the temperature difference we now have a cooling system in the pits for the front brakes and the frontal cooling system of the car, when it came in with no water left in the tank the left hand side front pads caught alight, and thats after two cool down laps! :)

Sure enough though we have done some math on the car today and have worked around what I believe is some sensible SA engineering thats still roadable to get this car comfortably into the 1:10 zone at the track :domokun:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

give me a drive, 3rd lap I promise you a 1.09 :)

or at least die trying !!

nice work, great read.

currently home-prepping my rb26 track car ready for its 1st rundown on 12/4/01 at the sau:sa track day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt get around to a full G-plot today (forgot actually!)

What I can tell you though Fungoolie is that in the Esses we are seeing around 1.35-1.4 lateral G loading,

and the big one -1.2G at 202km/h on the face of the kink. Thats why it feels a little scary :P

Cogs of steel guys! 1.2G in the kink? Glad you had slicks on! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...