Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Willall Racing just ran a 1 min 12.19 at Mallala today in their JDM R35 GTR.

Faster than the group A R32 GTR!

Congratulations Keir & Martin. You guys are flying now.

E85 looks like the way to go, when are you going to fit the bigger turbos?

Wish I was there................. oh well. I will keep working.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/307957-r35-faster-than-group-a-r32-gtr/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

congrats, its great that a relatively standard 35 gtr tweaked by a few cluey guys in the city of churches has outdone a 21 year old R32 with extensive race history funded by a rich tobacco company with part factory backing run by one of the best in the business :)

:laugh:

Today was one of those fruitful testing sessions where the track is 'in the slot' versus other times recently when we have been there where the drifters have convered the corners is dirt, or the supertrucks had laid diesel everywhere. No excuses today, it was a good solid fast track condition day and with plenty of time we were able to run some good data on the car and start to dial in the suspension and wing settings. Best part though is that after a couple of months working on our EVO programme I was able to get back in the chair of the GTR and have a feel of the setup....I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity of 'de-greening' the slicks in the morning session, which is kind of like trying to drive a 9 second drag car on ice.

The biggest problem the GTR faces in its current guise is that it is traction limited. Believe it or not, even with a set of new Michelin medium compound slicks on board and properly bedded in controlling wheelspin through the esses and out of turns three and five is a real problem, and one that can panic the four wheel drive electronics if not managed correctly. You really need to feed the throttle to stop the fronts and rears lighting up and pushing the car into a big sideways moment. I found this out early on in the piece when the tyres were still green. The pure raw straighline speed of the car is unnerving as it builds speed so quickly, and is stretching well into fifth gear at the braking points, as is keeping the throttle into it through the kink and the long left hander out of the nothern hairpin. Its a difficult balancing act, and one I wasnt prepared to push the limits of after the break, so 14s over the three laps I did was acceptable. The whole time you need to keep the thought that this is a 700hp+ road car chassis in the back of your head and drive accordingly. It would be interesting to take one of the 'these cars drive themselves' crew for a passenger lap for the sport of it one day. My only suggestion would be to bring an adult diaper or be prepared to pay a cleaning fee :(

'Power down' engine management settings (TPS controlled boost mapping) for corner exit speed and then adjusting the relationship between bump/rebound and tyre pressure for the varying track temperatures over the day gave us the pace increase, no magic here, just a methodical work structure of test and tune. Sensibly on fresh tyres there is no reason why we shouldnt be able to record consistent 1:10 laps in this car. That might sound a little far fetched now, but 6 months ago the idea of a 1:12 in a road car would have been bordering on unbelievable, particularly as this is a stock engine, stock turbo, stock transmission car. Some well thought out modifications, a set of slick tyres and ongoing testing and development are the keys to this cars pace :(

We have some way to go still to beat the Winfield cars by the looks of it, Skaife had it on pole there in 1991 with a 1.09 or similar. One must always have targets! However we are only 3 tenths of the outright Carerra Cup lap record to put the whole thing in perspective :nyaanyaa:

Edited by Martin Donnon

+1 on the brake water spray progress..

And not to cast aspersions on you and Keir's driving skills Martin, but you have to remember it was "Thee Mark Skaife" driving that R32. We need to compare apples with apples here. What additional time would him or some other professional driver well on his game be able to extract out of your R35?

Edited by fungoolie

Interestingly enough the brake cooling system raised its head in anger when I had overlooked part of my job. Essentially I didnt mark off the bottle was filled between sessions, and sure enough there was enough water surge away from the pickup of the pump to ensure that before the low level warning was on (there was still over a litre in the tank) that the car was off an into the dirt with the brake pedal on the floor. At this pace we have four laps of full stint running before we have to refill the stock washer bottle, or risk boiling the brake fluid. To give you an idea of the temperature difference we now have a cooling system in the pits for the front brakes and the frontal cooling system of the car, when it came in with no water left in the tank the left hand side front pads caught alight, and thats after two cool down laps! :)

Sure enough though we have done some math on the car today and have worked around what I believe is some sensible SA engineering thats still roadable to get this car comfortably into the 1:10 zone at the track :domokun:

give me a drive, 3rd lap I promise you a 1.09 :)

or at least die trying !!

nice work, great read.

currently home-prepping my rb26 track car ready for its 1st rundown on 12/4/01 at the sau:sa track day

Martin

what are you max lateral g's now, vs say prior ro the slicks and/or wing? Might be handy to put a scale on the right hand of the chart

Or even post your G force polar plot please.

I didnt get around to a full G-plot today (forgot actually!)

What I can tell you though Fungoolie is that in the Esses we are seeing around 1.35-1.4 lateral G loading,

and the big one -1.2G at 202km/h on the face of the kink. Thats why it feels a little scary :down:

I didnt get around to a full G-plot today (forgot actually!)

What I can tell you though Fungoolie is that in the Esses we are seeing around 1.35-1.4 lateral G loading,

and the big one -1.2G at 202km/h on the face of the kink. Thats why it feels a little scary :P

Cogs of steel guys! 1.2G in the kink? Glad you had slicks on! :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • pffft! My alignments are starting to take 3-4 weeks each. Bugger overnight - that would be a dream! Overnight is when I leave it on stands with the rear suspension in pieces, hoping I can remember where I was at when I come back to it. I have to set the car up on a level surface so I can get decent camber measurements, then try to set the RUCAs to the right length to get that right. Then I have to put the car somewhere else where I have enough room to set up the bumpsteer gauge (laser, paper, mirror), so I can dial out that. Then I need to go measure camber again because changing the tension arm length affects that also. Then I need to measure toe, and I can't do that to my own satisfaction at home, so I have to put it on an actual aligner. Then I have to go back and fix the camber again, and if that took more than a half a turn, decide if I want to set up the bumpsteer measurements again. I previously had the bumpsteer almost completely banished and then I started changing things again! And that's only the rear end. Not even gotten to talking about the front yet. And this has been going on in the context of me discovering a seized bolt in the LHR FUCA bush at the upright, hence needing total disassembly to replace that bush and the others that were not far away from the same outcome, replacing sphericals in the front end and making a mistake that resulted in needing to do it again, which is only half done right now. It's a selfmade nightmare. Only have self to blame, etc etc. But regardless, I am so complelely unable to utilise the services of a normal wheel aligner that I have no choice. I haven't found a shop in my city that does "race" alignments - and by that I don't mean I want my car to be set up for racing, but the set of adjustments that I have available and that need to be used to do the alignment are the same as you'd find on a race car. I haven't looked everywhere, but there doesn't appear to be the equivalent of the motorsport focused shops that are present in Sydney and Melbourne. And such an alignment would cost $300, and you only want to do it once in a while, and you don't want to find out that you have to replace bushes and bearings and such while you are spending that $300 so you have to come back and spend it again a week later. So I stay living in my self made nightmare for the moment.  
    • Well, yeah, obviously. But then you have a turbo with 270kW "design", meaning it will have the higher boost threshold and lag of a bigger turbo, but only doing the work of a smaller turbo. That's the suck. That's actually exactly where I am right now, because my stocker exploded and I got Tao to do a highflow for me. I got a low pressure actuator on it and don't push it past ~10 psi or so, where the stocker was being run at ~12 psi. it makes a little more power than the stocker did, but it lags like a bitch. But, if I run any more boost it starts to ping and the ECU goes into panic mode, which cuts all the fun, so it clearly needs to be tuned. But, until such time as I (which is not I, it's my bro-in-law) can actually get the dyno working again, and get some injectors, and do all the swap over of those and the R35 AFM, I can't attempt to use the turbo the way it really deserves to. So what I have now is something that drives worse than what it did before it filled the cat with little pieces of turbine. I will tune it eventually, and probably only push it up to ~250-270 rwkW, which is pretty close to the max for that highflow anyway. I would imagine that by getting the tune right, and with newer betterrer injectors, we can probably make the boost come on a little earlier than it does now.** And if I do not think that the top end reward is worth the low end sacrifice, I will sell it off and convert to a G30, because the smaller ones of those come on boost very nicely on a 25 and make more power than I realistically need or want. The only reason I didn't do it at the time the turbo blew up is that I wasn't ready to sink a lot of money into an Artec manifold, reverse rotation turbo, the AFM and injector upgrade that would have been immediately compulsory, and the dyno was being problematic.*** It was easier and faster to just put the highflow on. And then, as I mentioned in an earlier post, even that is not "easy", because Tao's highflows use a shorter core than the Hitachi, so the compressor housing moves backwards in the bay, necessitating that all of the pipework had to get modded. ** And maybe just maybe, check the valve clearances and put new shims through, because I have recently seen firsthand on another motor that sloppy clearances on the shims can cost a lot of effective timing and lift and really slow an engine down. 3S-GTE in a Caldina got new shims, closing the clearances from just above the max to right down near the minimum, and it is a massively different car to drive. On boost the better part of 1000 rpm earlier!
    • ooooooh so this is where they get posted  Was at a wedding that day anyway, but the next one I will be there for SURE.
    • @PranK, why do we have this restriction? Because photos are the first thing that gets asked of new people on the forums. Do the spam bots post photos if allowed?
    • How do you rate the clutch @joshuaho96? Sometimes I wonder whether it's genuinely very driveable or whether I just feel that way because it cost a good chunk of money. Most recently when seeing the guy at the tyre shop struggle to move the car...
×
×
  • Create New...