Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Came across this today.

It's the Attorney Generals site where they are asking for submissions on if R18+ Games should be allowed.

http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/...confidentiality

You can bet that all the groups who are against this have been notified to make there submissions, so if you have a few seconds have your say. The below is a link to the Word doc template and also has the email address where you send it to.

http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/rwpattach.nsf...e+-+Feb2010.doc

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/308727-r18-games-public-consultation/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

EB games has had a pertition for R18+ games recently at their outlets. I don't know how effective it would be but I signed it anyway. Hopefully we can finally get him to change his mind.

  • 9 months later...
I didnt want to start a new thread but I just had to share the lols around :D

http://au.gamespot.com/news/6284373.html?t...nes%3Btitle%3B1

The Australian Christian Lobby is against this because they don't want more violence and sex in the media??

A bit hippocritical seeing as the whole christian religion is built on violence (as told in the bible) and fondling with young boys (as handled by your local priest)...

I know, that second point is a bit harsh.............

I didnt want to start a new thread but I just had to share the lols around :D

http://au.gamespot.com/news/6284373.html?t...nes%3Btitle%3B1

Do these ***ts ever shut up about anything?

it may be harsh.. but its true.

No it's not.. As that is Catholic not Christian.. either way though LOL

Religion is once again f**king it up for the rest of us..

Edited by .:: GimpS-R34 ::.
The Australian Christian Lobby is against this because they don't want more violence and sex in the media??

A bit hippocritical seeing as the whole christian religion is built on violence (as told in the bible) and fondling with young boys (as handled by your local priest)...

I know, that second point is a bit harsh.............

Yeah!

QFT!

No it's not.. As that is Catholic not Christian.. either way though LOL

My mistake, Craig. I automatically think Catholics when I hear Christians. I know for a fact that Orthodox religion requires the priest to be married to a woman before he can officially become a priest... but that's another point for another topic.

Back to this topic, I believe it's the ignorance of the parents that results in kids playing these kind of video games. That being said, I used to watch robocop and other violent movies when I was really young, as well as play violent video games (MK) as did most of my friends and we don't run around killing people... or doing GTA (although it would be awesome).

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

R18+ Classification is very, very slowly progressing into becoming a reality...

http://asia.gamespot.com/news/6285290.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B0

"No, we don't have an R18+ for games just yet. At the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General meeting on Friday, December 10 in Canberra, federal, state, and territory ministers did not vote on introducing R18+ for games. Instead, they voted on drafting a set of preliminary guidelines for the introduction of an adult classification for games. What this means is that they have agreed to write the law that will allow for R18+; once they write it up, they will vote on introducing the guidelines. And following from that, they will vote on an R18+ classification at the next SCAG meeting in March 2011. "

i dont get it, there can be R rated movies, but not R rated games? is this because parents are to lazy to prevent their kids from playing them? its easy to stop your kids from watching R rated movies, why not games?

with the internat it's actually harder to stop them watching adult movies then playing games actually..

Are you over 18? Yes [ENTER] or No [Please don't enter and leave the site, however you can still get in if you click yes as we can't tell anyway].. Don't lie now..

Edited by .:: GimpS-R34 ::.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No intention of driving the car the way it's set up now, just wanting to make sure I haven't made any mistakes along the way so that the tune can go smoothly, I don't want to waste anyone's time with stupid issues. And of course I intend to get it towed to the dyno in a completed state 😅 I have the base fuel pressure with the vacuum disconnected set at about 40psi, which I believe is at least relatively close to stock fuel pressure, maybe I'll have a fiddle with the reg and see what happens. For all I know I could be wasting my time with this and I should just plumb it in and see what the tuner reckons. I just find it a bit strange that it seems to be under so much load just free revving, but maybe that's just a result of the turbo slowing down the exhaust gasses and making a restriction in the flow, with no boost to compensate.
    • The boy just hit up google translate and it worked a treat, he said step one was "please urinate with precision and elegance", he then sent me the correct translation  I get some new loctite for the small fixtures tomorrow and get some "dort" going after that 🤣
    • Right, so is the fuel pressure the same as it was previously? If not, well, it's not going to work well. I can understand the theory I assume you are going for, which is: "Run it N/A, and if I have the original AFM, and same amount of fuel and intake air as previously, the fact there's a turbo in my exhaust should still make it run" Which it... might? Provided you don't actually change how much air or fuel is going into the car.. or getting out. But if you have changed that, all bets are off. What is the purpose to even have the car run this way? To get it to a tuner? And if the goal is to limp it to a tuner, you're still going to what - plumb up a whole intercooler system and new intake in the parking lot out front before your tune......?
    • Haha yea it's a bit of a weird setup at the moment, just wanted to make sure I sorted out any headaches before dyno day. At the moment I've changed the exhaust manifold, turbo and downpipe, 460lph fuel pump and rising rate reg as well as the previously mentioned headstuds and gasket. The nistune was already mapped for the car as it was and drove around for a few months no worries. The plan is to run flex fuel hence the big pump, which I've wired direct to the battery through a relay to avoid voltage issues.
    • Um. Was the ECU the same as the one previously there? I know R33's needed R32 GTST ECU's or other tomfoolery to run Nistune. This is such a wild setup. Most people would plumb in the turbo then not drive the car (i.e tow it to a tuner). What's actually changed since it last ran?
×
×
  • Create New...