Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Remember OPINION isn't FACT...

There are part numbers on the picture of the core so why dont you check facts rather than voicing opinions. Facts with cause me the all the issues not opinions once they go on my engine

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

haha I have no idea why some guys are saying they aren't 2835s?? They seem to be guessing based on one known set of 2835 with different housings. Definitely NOT 2530, or 25 anything. The rear wheel is 10 blade with pitch that looks EXACTLY like a GT30 based wheel - although cropped to 56mm.

Which is what a 2835 is. These just appear to have different housing - perhaps earlier (or later) models?

Remember OPINION isn't FACT... There are part numbers on the picture of the core so why dont you check facts rather than voicing opinions. Facts with cause me the all the issues not opinions once they go on my engine

I trust you aren't talking to me with this rant? I'm helping you out here.

Cause all I've given you is facts, my only opinions such as I've given previously eg. "looks like" are stated like that because of my uncertainly of YOUR measurements.

I'm in the business of measurements and I see people FARK up all the time. You'd be amazed how much an effect preconceptions and subjectivity can have on objective measurements. ie. FACTS aren't always facts.

You measured the wheels both exducer and inducer - if the measurements are the same as 2835's - the link I gave you with FACTS. Actually measurements to within 0.1mm.

Then count the blades on the rear = 10 (25 series have 9 blades)

Then see that they are badged at 2835. Now nothing is certain in this world, not even Newtonian physics, but I'd be pretty damn sure they are 2835. Even if they aren't the blade charaterisctics of size, pitch and number of blades ensures they will behave like a 2835.....unless they are Chinese copies made from balsa wood.

Wow not sure why so many people don't believe they are 2835's I am positive they are, I have seen these turbo's before though they were made in limited numbers. I am sure they flow less than GT-RS. HKS rated them at like 760hp so between 2540 & GT-RS on a 26 you wont see any boost till 4500rpm.

On the right motor (rb30/26) they would be fine for street/track.

Reading through all posts I think most had never heard of the low mount 2835 kit hence assumptions were made. Others just tried to enforce an opinion based on the persons profile status, anyway no harm no foul. OP don't take offence bud there is some good advice offered here, if you need to spend more money to get these operational than a better performing (brand new turbo) why would you?

So how will these perform. Iv got a built bottom stock top? Iv been in a gtrs equipped car and it was laggy as shit. But gave a decent wack

They will be very laggy, being as they need a lot of money to get going you would be better off buying a set of working -5s, you will make similar power as you probably won't be able to push the 2835s that hard where as the -5s will come on sooner with less lag. They also won't need new piping etc like going a single will.

So how will these perform. Iv got a built bottom stock top? Iv been in a gtrs equipped car and it was laggy as shit. But gave a decent wack

I would say you have it there mate "laggy as shit" you need head work (porting)and cams to be able to live with them on the street. The GT-RS has a smaller zorst wheel so may be more responsive than these but are rated higher hp from HKS. That would give a good indication as to why these were never made in large quantity's.

Not to bad. Mid 300's i seemed to see a bit of. Is that their flow limit? What the max ppl have gotten out of them?

400s, and they will look and fit much nicer than a big single, I think they will suit your goal better than anything else, also quite well priced.

Edited by Rolls
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...