Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hehehe, yeh i am happy, but i dont know i was watching a you tube video and the HKS GTRS sounded very and looked very responsive...... So if i wanted a hks 2540, what would i say to the Garret shop guy?? do i say 2860?

The HKS GT2540 aka Garrett GT2876R is an AWFUL turbo. The compressor is way too big for the turbine. You will get better response and make MUCH more power with a Garrett GT3071R .63.

if a HKS 2540 is roughly equiv to the Garrett 2876R, then is the HKS 2535 closest to the Garrett 2871R?

I've always thought the 2871R was similar to the HKS GT-RS.

educate me :P

Edited by Munkyb0y
if a HKS 2540 is roughly equiv to the Garrett 2876R, then is the HKS 2535 closest to the Garrett 2871R?

I've always thought the 2871R was similar to the HKS GT-RS.

educate me :)

read the last post on page one mate, the GTRS is a 2871 52T in HKS housings. the 2535 has yet to be mentioned.

geraus, if you want to do a budget HKS equivilant turbo, HP in a box sell the GT2871R 52T turbo with a "RB" housing and S15 style comp cover for $1925. that should be hell easy to set up and I believe will net you within reasonable amount to the HKS GTRS, provided the exhaust housing is a .63..... I would be interested to see a 56T version combo'd with a .82 RB housing on an RB25 ;)

From what I've read the HKS 2540 is ok but not well matched to an RB20/25. the HKS2530 is good for about 230kw at 18-19psi, the 2540 about 240kw but apparently its much less responsive. What turbo you decide on should depend on what you use the car for.

I've been in NEO powered car with a 2540 untuned, and the response and power was awesome! (seat of the pants feeling). I don't know how people can say they are laggy or whatever lol. I'm pretty sure you can only buy a GTRS new though.

From reading some of the other threads, some people say tha GTRS is awesome for RB25, others say that you need to lean on it too much in terms of boost pressure and revving to get it making power, which is why I lean more towards the 2835.

From reading some of the other threads, some people say tha GTRS is awesome for RB25, others say that you need to lean on it too much in terms of boost pressure and revving to get it making power, which is why I lean more towards the 2835.

nonsense, look thru the dyno results thread... lost of ppl making 200+ before 5000 and hardly anyone under 250kw with sensible boost. If your aiming for 250kw, no more, I say GTRS is cream, 270+ 2835/3071 but then you run into other issues (money n that).

had to read that a few times lol. but yeh thats good to know man cheers! cos yeh when i brought was lik wat the heck had garrett on the front and hks on the bak! by the sounds of it the 2530 is a good turbo for a rb20! i dont want lag which this doesnt :)

well I'm just going off not only the dyno thread but the turbo specific thread that I dug up last night, most of the concerns were of the type that you're having to stuff 18 odd psi into an RB25DET to get 250 odd rwkw, and they apparently have the weakest pistons of any RB motor.

Does the HKS2540 still runs of a .64 turbine housing in a T3x RB25det OEM print or some thing bigger?

I think I can make some thing extremely similar if that is.

Does the HKS2540 still runs of a .64 turbine housing in a T3x RB25det OEM print or some thing bigger?

I think I can make some thing extremely similar if that is.

Dont bother, 2540 is not a good combo.

make some 2871 52trim .60 front .64 rear, that is the better combo.

well I'm just going off not only the dyno thread but the turbo specific thread that I dug up last night, most of the concerns were of the type that you're having to stuff 18 odd psi into an RB25DET to get 250 odd rwkw, and they apparently have the weakest pistons of any RB motor.

18psi is not an issue, ive saved a few sheets for personal reference. once you run too much boost you start to choke up top. None of the graphs I have saved have any issue hitting 250, and the area under the curve is enormous. plus they go right to top revs before they dare tail off let alone redline, an excellent turbo.

as for 18psi and weak pistons, sounds like good gospel. Boost is a tangent like fuel and timing, any of the above can create nonsense combustion temps and pressure on the motor if out of proportion. Boost itself doesnt kill the motor, the tune does, seen 170000k CA eat 20psi for years to come daily on OEM bottom end. Good tune to say the least, its still running, has been a regular drift cop since 08 and been running 20psi since 2005.

well I spose you'd also have to look at the amount in CFM of air literally going into the motor rather than boost itself. I'd had a look at some of the graphs too, nice power curves, starting to toss up the idea of having a 2835 to get 250rwkw, but then in my experiences the more boost being run, the more risk of leaking cooler pipes and other such shenanighans.

if you want 250, get a GTRS. a 2835 will not boast as many benefits as it at that power level. only go the 2835 if you wish to get another 20 - 30kw.

The GT"2540" only used a 0.64 A/R turbine housing in "T3" footprint because thats all HKS had made , stupidly didn't do a 0.86 A/R one as well .

Garrett do both sizes but only in T25 sized mount flange .

I wouldn't bother recreating the 2540 because it was never a good thing IMO , you really have to wonder when you pull a small comp cover off a turbo and find a 76mm T04E wheel ...

The GT2871R 52T used in the GTRS units is definitely a step in the right direction .

The GT"2835" , or as they are now known GT3071R , move up to the GT30 turbine family and in this cropped turbine form tend to work best in a GT30 based turbine housing .

Hopefully one day Garrett will have their GT30 IW turbine housings machined to suit these 56.6mm cropped GT30 turbines and we will have affordable turbos along the lines of HKS's GT2835 Pro S ones . Who knows , maybe they can be machined to take a sleeve and the sleeve machined to take the 56.6mm turbine . Throw in a comp housing altered to take the surge slot and holes and suddenly you have a cheaper competitor to HKS's GT2835 Pro S .

Don't quote me but maybe a 0.63 GT30 IW housing on a 56T cropped GT3071R cartridge with a surge modified T04B truck cover may make a nice sort of bolt on for a sensible street R33 RB25 .

A .

Edited by discopotato03
Don't quote me but maybe a 0.63 GT30 IW housing on a 56T cropped GT3071R cartridge with a surge modified T04B truck cover may make a nice sort of bolt on for a sensible street R33 RB25 .

Boost control, the 3071 and .63 IW are not a good combo for it as far as results go.. but an extremely good turbo if they were haha.

Good to see your confidence in the 2835 also, I may want to revisit that as the price really isnt too bad.

The names of these things ties everyone up in knots

What I ment was the cropped GT3071R AKA GT2835 cartridge in the Garrett GT30 0.63 A/R IW housing . I'm pretty sure the one you are refering to is the std or 60mm GT30 turbine version of the GT3071R cartridge - 700177-5023 .

Cheers A .

The turbobygarrett site shows two of them the difference being turbine trim .

84T version - turbo no 700382- 3 cartridge no 700177-3 .

90T version - turbo no 700382-20 cartridge no 700177-4 .

In that form they have a machined out , bastardised , GT28 turbine housing and a std snout 0.50 A/R T04E compressor housing .

My gut feeling is that one of those cartridges in a suitably machined GT30 IW turbine housing may fill the gap between the GTRS (GT2871R 52T) and the GT3076R . HKS had such a thing and called it GT2835 Pro S , if Garrett housings can be used then very likely a cheaper alternative .

The main issue is getting whoever casts and machines those Garrett GT30 IW housings to take less out of the center for the slightly smaller , cropped , GT30 turbine wheel . The std or full sized GT30 UHP turbine is approx 59.9 by 54.9mm and the cropped ones around 56.6 by either 51.8 or 53.6 for 84 and 90 trim versions of this turbine .

My HKS specs quotes GT2835's rated at 410 PS in normal form or 420 in GT Pro S form . By normal I mean in a HKS supplied T25 flanged GT30 turbine housing in 0.61 or 0.73 A/R . From memory they don't have port shrouded compressor housings .

My spec sheet quotes the GT2835 Pro S (T3 flanged RB20/25 bolt on) as having a 0.68 A/R turbine housing and the port shrouded compressor housing , power rating is 420 PS or roughly 420 Hp/315 Kw .

Note the smallest Garrett GT30 IW turbine housing is 0.63 A/R vs 0.68 for the HKS one .

The point of all this is to spin the turbine and compressor a little faster for the available exhaust energy than the 60 x 55mm full sized GT30 turbine can .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...