Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nissan Skyline R32 GTR 1993 N1 Turbos

27,000km independently confirmed.

The car has the original N1 turbos that are larger and don't have the typical ceramic turbines that frequently break under improved boost, rather it has steel turbines designed for increased boost.

The car has only ever been owned by two people. I'm over 50 and the only owner since imported, it was previously owned by a 60 year old school teacher in Japan. This means it has never been owned by a young person or miss been treated. I have never increased the boost and believe it was never done in Japan either.

The car was dyno tested when it first arrived in the country and produced 196kW at all four wheels on the standard 7.5psi. This figure is easily over 200kW if tested at the rear wheels. Amounts to around 290kW at the flywheel.

Stunning White.

5 speed manual.

Looks good inside and out. Tiny bump in hood.

This car hasn't been modified since imported and has hardly been driven.

OS Giken twin plate clutch.

HKS Dump pipes.

HKS Front pipes.

HKS Hi-Power 95mm (3.75inch) hi-flow exhaust.

HKS Hi-Power 120mm (4.72 inch) muffler.

16inch rims.

HKS Pod filters.

Very rare rear lip.

Steering wheel.

CD player.

Stereo system.

Just been taken to two mechanics for check and service before sale.

Peders - Suspension checked, plus:

· Wheel alignment.

· Front rod bush replaced.

Mechanics – Service and check, plus:

· New battery

· New platinum plugs

· Tuned engine bay.

Always garaged and only driven occasionally on weekends.

The car is being sold due to underuse.

I'm not desperate to sell the car but if I get a good price, from a good buyer who will take care of it, I will.

I only want to discuss further with serious buyers.

I don't want to trade as I have other cars already.

Located in South Australia, Western suburbs.

If you reply via online it may take a short time for me to answer as I'm currently rather busy.

Price: $19,999

Contact Person: Samuel 0433 031 312

post-40400-1267175576_thumb.jpg

post-40400-1267175631_thumb.jpg

post-40400-1267175728_thumb.jpg

post-40400-1267175761_thumb.jpg

post-40400-1267175803_thumb.jpg

post-40400-1267176355_thumb.jpg

post-40400-1267176386_thumb.jpg

post-40400-1267176452_thumb.jpg

VIN please. Wasnt this posted somewhere for sale already?

Yea it was but it was advertised as a N1 car. Unfortunately, that was a mistake and it only has the N1 turbos. Therefore, the reason for the repost.

and it's only had 27,000km on it... I find that hard to believe. I have a 1993 GTR as well which is also for sale with a turbo upgrade due to the ceramic turbo's giving out and a computer upgrade to control the boost to not allow any further blowouts or engine damage. But my car sits in the garage 24/7 and gets driven like 5/365 days and that's to the corner shop. Something sounds fishy with that amount of km's cos I doubt that the car only had less than 27,oookm on clock when imported to Australia.

and it's only had 27,000km on it... I find that hard to believe. I have a 1993 GTR as well which is also for sale with a turbo upgrade due to the ceramic turbo's giving out and a computer upgrade to control the boost to not allow any further blowouts or engine damage. But my car sits in the garage 24/7 and gets driven like 5/365 days and that's to the corner shop. Something sounds fishy with that amount of km's cos I doubt that the car only had less than 27,oookm on clock when imported to Australia.

No one gives a shit what you think. This looks like a nice car and any genuine buyer can sort the issues out for themselves.

You have blatantly broken forum rules on your own GTR SALES thread, and now you come here to give your unwanted and useless opinions on another persons car.

I would have posted this on your thread but you have been bumping it so desperately that I was not about to help you.

and it's only had 27,000km on it... I find that hard to believe. I have a 1993 GTR as well which is also for sale with a turbo upgrade due to the ceramic turbo's giving out and a computer upgrade to control the boost to not allow any further blowouts or engine damage. But my car sits in the garage 24/7 and gets driven like 5/365 days and that's to the corner shop. Something sounds fishy with that amount of km's cos I doubt that the car only had less than 27,oookm on clock when imported to Australia.

Dont comment on something you have no idea about. The car was imported with 23,000km. In Japan the owner was a school teacher who never drove it. He lived in a place in Japan that is snowed in 8 months of the year. Thus the low k's.

Almost exactly how i would have a GT-R (except for possibly the rear spoiler but that's easy fixed, and the rims, i'd change them to NISMO LMGT4s ;P)

Good luck with the sale mate!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...