Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Pulled my rb30/26 down over the last 2 weeks and today finally got to taking the pistons out. Basically I have 87mm rb30et pistons in there now, and I have new higher CR pistons to go back in which will yield 9.5:1

I had the bottom end built by an engine builder back in the day. I pulled them out to find this, marks were on every cyliner and on both inlet/exhaust side of the bore:

post-13028-1267327105_thumb.jpg

post-13028-1267327123_thumb.jpg

post-13028-1267327149_thumb.jpg

Now I have two questions:

1. Is this caused by incorrect piston to bore clearance? If not what is likely to have caused it?

2. Can I give the bores a lite hone and re-fit my new 87mm pistons and be OK? The bores are 87mm at the moment, and the new pistons are too, hence the issue.

Some people have told me a lite bottle brush hone to get the marks out won't hurt, others have told me to ditch the block all together and hone out another 30 block to suite my new 87mm pistons.

Issue with that is I spent many a hours modifying this block for the 4wd adapter plate :blush:

Anyways what be SAU's opinion.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/310036-what-has-caused-this-marks-on-bore/
Share on other sites

I wouldn't imagine piston to bore would play as a factor here given it is on all cylinders in the same spot.

Potentially, could it have been a problem with lubrication, as in the squirters were not getting to those points in the bore?

Or a more unlikely cause could be too many revs while the engine is cold and the pistons have not expanded fully causing the bore wear?

Just some ideas...

I would speak to the bloke that built it though - how long had the motor been going before the pull down?

First off you can still see the cross hatching in those dark areas, so the finish is still fine. It doesnt look like any abnormal wear, if it was you would see straight up and done scratch marks in those dark spots, it looks like something has stained your bores. But always hard to tell just looking at photos.

Is it carbon build? will it scratch off? does it still feel smooth, try and describe it to us a bit more.

Also a second interesting clue is that the dark strip goes down below the line where the top of the piston would be at the bottom of its stroke.

There is also a very clear line at the top where it stops, it looks like the line could line up with one of the rings. Figure out where the top of that line lines up with the piston when its at TDC that might give you another clue to what is causing it.

Also do the same at the bottom of the stoke.

But it almost looks like the oil squirters are squirtering at that spot at the bottom (hence the rounded stain at the bottom) and the piston is dragging it up to the top. Over time it could of just stained the bore.

Then again like I said its still very hard to diagnoise properly without having a proper look.

Edited by ascenion24
when the engine was rebuilt last time, was the block torque plate bored and honed? have you taken messurements in all different areas of the bore to see how round it is...

valid point

Cartman has it spot on, you have blow by because the bore is out of round. It should be nice and shiny like the rest of the bore because your rings are scraping, they are not scraping on your black bit. You probably didn't even notice this when driving, may have used just a tad more oil, but not much, and would have vented a bit more that usual into your catch can

are the marks on the pistons where the skirts are???

this is the largest part of the piston, i reckon the piston to bore clearance was too tight,

another possibility is the pistons have swelled during an extreme heat session, big burnout, too many hard laps on circuit etc.

Thanks for all the help guys.

Yeah it did burn oil ever so slightly, according to a mate following me once under load it was evident. It ran a 100% atmo catch can too so this probably explains the burning oil. Has a brand new head so I knew it was not stem seals that was causing the issue.

I think your right in that the bores are out. I don't know how it was done last time unfortunately, I just took it to a local mob with the pistons and they bored it out to 87mm and assembled it with the pistons I supplied.

I ran a bottle brush through no6 this afternoon very quickly and it took the marks right off and it looked brand new again. Obviously I still have a major problem but.

Waiting on a mate to bring some equipment around so we can measure the bores properly.

So where too from here? Another block?

take off your old comp rings and keep in order of cylinder, carefully put them in there matching cylinder and check the ring gaps, you will also be able to see if the bore marks are out of round, this is not accurate you still need to measure with a bore gauge

a new block depends on the meat you have to remove to get it round again, it may still be within spec and OK you need to mike up the bore both ways and then check that against clearance spec's

Thanks for all the help guys.

Yeah it did burn oil ever so slightly, according to a mate following me once under load it was evident. It ran a 100% atmo catch can too so this probably explains the burning oil. Has a brand new head so I knew it was not stem seals that was causing the issue.

I think your right in that the bores are out. I don't know how it was done last time unfortunately, I just took it to a local mob with the pistons and they bored it out to 87mm and assembled it with the pistons I supplied.

I ran a bottle brush through no6 this afternoon very quickly and it took the marks right off and it looked brand new again. Obviously I still have a major problem but.

Waiting on a mate to bring some equipment around so we can measure the bores properly.

So where too from here? Another block?

James, were the pistons installed the correct way around? Did the piston skirts appear to have excessive wear. The pin offset the wrong way around could have the rod angle incorrect at TDC.

since the marks go well past where the rings sit, to me looks like to much piston to bore clearance. since the skirt has rubbed it up aswell. they were installed the right way round? little dot or arrow facing forward?

its fairly normal to get those marks up top with forgies, but not the whole way down past the rings. what pistons were they? and what ones are you putting in?

I've had marks like these in an engine before and it was due to excessive piston to bore clearance. Do the pistons have polished areas above the top ring on the thrust faces? You get this when the piston "tips" in the bore. Must've been noisy on cold starts..

Hey guys,

I think your right, piston to bore clearance. Pistons were all around the right way, according to the mark.

Pistons that it had were CP.

Measured it all up tonight, I think they have added the piston to bore clearance to the actual hone itself.

Bores were showing a fairly consistant 87.07 across the board. Plus whatever CP recommend on top of that again which is like 3-3.5 thou I read.

I think that is what has happend anyway. Skirts are all showing signs of wear yes.

Sound plausible?

Edited by James_03

Unless I worked that out incorrectly, thats only 2.8 thou of clearance. I assume the piston size is 87mm at the skirt? .07 is only .0028" Unless your measuring devices are not accurate enough???

What if the piston to bore was too tight, not too excessive? Would the rubbing show up much the same? or would it be in four corners instead of just two?

If it was too tight then it should have scored the bore and the piston should have score marks on the top skirt above the top ring lands due to 'unaccommodated' heat expansion.....well thats my take.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...