Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Pulled my rb30/26 down over the last 2 weeks and today finally got to taking the pistons out. Basically I have 87mm rb30et pistons in there now, and I have new higher CR pistons to go back in which will yield 9.5:1

I had the bottom end built by an engine builder back in the day. I pulled them out to find this, marks were on every cyliner and on both inlet/exhaust side of the bore:

post-13028-1267327105_thumb.jpg

post-13028-1267327123_thumb.jpg

post-13028-1267327149_thumb.jpg

Now I have two questions:

1. Is this caused by incorrect piston to bore clearance? If not what is likely to have caused it?

2. Can I give the bores a lite hone and re-fit my new 87mm pistons and be OK? The bores are 87mm at the moment, and the new pistons are too, hence the issue.

Some people have told me a lite bottle brush hone to get the marks out won't hurt, others have told me to ditch the block all together and hone out another 30 block to suite my new 87mm pistons.

Issue with that is I spent many a hours modifying this block for the 4wd adapter plate :blush:

Anyways what be SAU's opinion.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/310036-what-has-caused-this-marks-on-bore/
Share on other sites

I wouldn't imagine piston to bore would play as a factor here given it is on all cylinders in the same spot.

Potentially, could it have been a problem with lubrication, as in the squirters were not getting to those points in the bore?

Or a more unlikely cause could be too many revs while the engine is cold and the pistons have not expanded fully causing the bore wear?

Just some ideas...

I would speak to the bloke that built it though - how long had the motor been going before the pull down?

First off you can still see the cross hatching in those dark areas, so the finish is still fine. It doesnt look like any abnormal wear, if it was you would see straight up and done scratch marks in those dark spots, it looks like something has stained your bores. But always hard to tell just looking at photos.

Is it carbon build? will it scratch off? does it still feel smooth, try and describe it to us a bit more.

Also a second interesting clue is that the dark strip goes down below the line where the top of the piston would be at the bottom of its stroke.

There is also a very clear line at the top where it stops, it looks like the line could line up with one of the rings. Figure out where the top of that line lines up with the piston when its at TDC that might give you another clue to what is causing it.

Also do the same at the bottom of the stoke.

But it almost looks like the oil squirters are squirtering at that spot at the bottom (hence the rounded stain at the bottom) and the piston is dragging it up to the top. Over time it could of just stained the bore.

Then again like I said its still very hard to diagnoise properly without having a proper look.

Edited by ascenion24
when the engine was rebuilt last time, was the block torque plate bored and honed? have you taken messurements in all different areas of the bore to see how round it is...

valid point

Cartman has it spot on, you have blow by because the bore is out of round. It should be nice and shiny like the rest of the bore because your rings are scraping, they are not scraping on your black bit. You probably didn't even notice this when driving, may have used just a tad more oil, but not much, and would have vented a bit more that usual into your catch can

are the marks on the pistons where the skirts are???

this is the largest part of the piston, i reckon the piston to bore clearance was too tight,

another possibility is the pistons have swelled during an extreme heat session, big burnout, too many hard laps on circuit etc.

Thanks for all the help guys.

Yeah it did burn oil ever so slightly, according to a mate following me once under load it was evident. It ran a 100% atmo catch can too so this probably explains the burning oil. Has a brand new head so I knew it was not stem seals that was causing the issue.

I think your right in that the bores are out. I don't know how it was done last time unfortunately, I just took it to a local mob with the pistons and they bored it out to 87mm and assembled it with the pistons I supplied.

I ran a bottle brush through no6 this afternoon very quickly and it took the marks right off and it looked brand new again. Obviously I still have a major problem but.

Waiting on a mate to bring some equipment around so we can measure the bores properly.

So where too from here? Another block?

take off your old comp rings and keep in order of cylinder, carefully put them in there matching cylinder and check the ring gaps, you will also be able to see if the bore marks are out of round, this is not accurate you still need to measure with a bore gauge

a new block depends on the meat you have to remove to get it round again, it may still be within spec and OK you need to mike up the bore both ways and then check that against clearance spec's

Thanks for all the help guys.

Yeah it did burn oil ever so slightly, according to a mate following me once under load it was evident. It ran a 100% atmo catch can too so this probably explains the burning oil. Has a brand new head so I knew it was not stem seals that was causing the issue.

I think your right in that the bores are out. I don't know how it was done last time unfortunately, I just took it to a local mob with the pistons and they bored it out to 87mm and assembled it with the pistons I supplied.

I ran a bottle brush through no6 this afternoon very quickly and it took the marks right off and it looked brand new again. Obviously I still have a major problem but.

Waiting on a mate to bring some equipment around so we can measure the bores properly.

So where too from here? Another block?

James, were the pistons installed the correct way around? Did the piston skirts appear to have excessive wear. The pin offset the wrong way around could have the rod angle incorrect at TDC.

since the marks go well past where the rings sit, to me looks like to much piston to bore clearance. since the skirt has rubbed it up aswell. they were installed the right way round? little dot or arrow facing forward?

its fairly normal to get those marks up top with forgies, but not the whole way down past the rings. what pistons were they? and what ones are you putting in?

I've had marks like these in an engine before and it was due to excessive piston to bore clearance. Do the pistons have polished areas above the top ring on the thrust faces? You get this when the piston "tips" in the bore. Must've been noisy on cold starts..

Hey guys,

I think your right, piston to bore clearance. Pistons were all around the right way, according to the mark.

Pistons that it had were CP.

Measured it all up tonight, I think they have added the piston to bore clearance to the actual hone itself.

Bores were showing a fairly consistant 87.07 across the board. Plus whatever CP recommend on top of that again which is like 3-3.5 thou I read.

I think that is what has happend anyway. Skirts are all showing signs of wear yes.

Sound plausible?

Edited by James_03

Unless I worked that out incorrectly, thats only 2.8 thou of clearance. I assume the piston size is 87mm at the skirt? .07 is only .0028" Unless your measuring devices are not accurate enough???

What if the piston to bore was too tight, not too excessive? Would the rubbing show up much the same? or would it be in four corners instead of just two?

If it was too tight then it should have scored the bore and the piston should have score marks on the top skirt above the top ring lands due to 'unaccommodated' heat expansion.....well thats my take.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
  • Create New...