Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Do you have a mechanic friend?

Do you have a panelbeater friend?

If so, make a list for each of you to check the car over.

If you have an older dude 'er dad to haggle for you after all the above ^^^ comes up trumps, see what the best price is - and haggle some more.

You might only need $100 to pay a deposit and get a receipt.

Then get details of the VIN/Chassis Number + Engine Number off the Rego & check that the Rego is in the name of the person who says he owns the car.

Then physically check on the car itself if those 2X numbers correspond.

You have to supply your Driver's Lic # to him.

Take the VIN/Chassis # + Engine # + Rego # and cross-check with REVS (Register of Encumbered VehicleS) in your state.

and get it inspected by someone that you trust at a WORKSHOP!! dont just get someone like RAC to come out to the vehicle.

i cant stress this enough. i almost bought a car which had a fair bit of body and chassis done to it, which i wouldnt have known about without getting it checked at a workshop.

Also it's a great idea to get a contract drawn up and signed by the seller saying that there are no outstanding defects or finance owing on the vehicle. I know a couple of people who have been stung a month or two after purchase with carry over defect notices. And it's your problem not the previous owner. The RTA or VicRoads etc don't care who owns the car. You can sell it 3 times over and they will track it down.

fark me you guys are rough..

i wouldnt bother selling a car to any of you based on the fat waste of my time and the insult to my car.

dont haggle.. its a pain in the arse.., make an offer... but dont haggle. if the car is good, then its good.. if its worth what the owner is asking, then pay it, dont haggle, it makes you look cheap. dont umm and uhh... you either want the car, or you dont.. you either have the cach, or you dont. unless there is one car asking x amount when all the other models are cheaper than x amount.

think about it this way... if you make a ridiculous offer and say thats all youve got, and you get denied, then you might miss out on the car, which you obviously have an interest it, or you will look like an idiot when you ring up the next day and offer more, after youve said thats all you had. for the seller... worst case is hes still got the car.. maybe he missed out on the cash.. but hes still got the car... you dont.. you missed out.

dont rock up at a car and look at it, and then go find out if you can get the money.. Know you can get the money before you even start looking.

and take the correct money... ive had an idiot who was coming to buy a bike off me... id advertised it for 3800, but told this guy he could have it for 3500... he said he wanted it, drove 4 hours down from coffs to come and check it out, but oh my... he only brought $3000 with him... and expected i would just take that.. i told him to come back when he had the extra $500..

i have owned 16 cars over my 10 years of having my licence... all of those have been excellent examples, and most of them have been a once only look.. i narrow my search down via the internet.. and then basically pick one based on colour, mods and location.. rock up with the cash and expect to drive the car home that day.

having said that, i am a mechanic, with a bit of body knowledge.. ive only not been satisfied with 2 cars ive ever looked at.. but my mentality is that there is nothing that cant be fixed.. little things can be tidied up, its not worth the risk of losing an overall good tidy car because it has a paint chip or something... getting the car is worth more to me than a few repairs that id probably change later anyway. every car i buy comes with a 5 year build plan, which includes a turbo, engine and gearbox rebuild.. though i get bored and want to change a year later.

if it has damage that you werent aware of... by all means, haggle the price of the repairs.. but dont discount the repairs, as this could lead to a better overall car..

i once looked at a my02 rex, had a bit of hail damage on the bonnet, none on the roof, i wouldve just fitted a c/f bonnet but old mate would not drop his price of $24000 which was way overpriced compared to others. ended up getting a mint example for $21000.

buyers look you guys are stating is insulting to alot of car owners.. its sad that alot of sellers are reasonably dishonest, but you can generally pick this up from the person selling it and their demeanor.

ive knocked away a heap of buyers over the years with offers when they know full well that what im selling is a pristine example.. i will not haggle, i will flat out refuse you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
×
×
  • Create New...