Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What?????

ARE YOU KIDDING ME

In the UK this IS the best you can get there is nothing that comes close do doing half the things this ebc can do

It mainly comes down to having it set up correctly performance wise as a vast amount of people out there dont understand it and chuck it in learn mode, so yeah it wont perform that well as its not set up for each car

But set it up for the car with the correct rpm boost vales and gear based boost control function and your laughing

So what have you guys got here that dose all more and better then???

haha its almost like you told him santa doesnt exist lol

if you wire in your low level indicator cut out on the power source for your ebc it will revert to stock if triggered.

excellent idea....stolen for future use too :thumbsup:

btw jjskyline79, STATUS has previously posted back to back dyno comparisons showing AVCR controlling boost poorly compared to other options...try a search on here

excellent idea....stolen for future use too :P

btw jjskyline79, STATUS has previously posted back to back dyno comparisons showing AVCR controlling boost poorly compared to other options...try a search on here

Sorry mate I just don't believe the findings

for starters he said there was no gain control on the avcr when there is

Plus I think there are quite a few that agree

http://www.skylineowners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=137822

Sorry mate I just don't believe the findings

for starters he said there was no gain control on the avcr when there is

Plus I think there are quite a few that agree

http://www.skylineowners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=137822

haha telling people who own an AVCR that it "aint all that" will always results in favourable posts.... it would be the same if i started a thread for any make of boost controller.

Datalogging various controllers over the years has been my resource of information as is the 800-900 odd cars ive had on my dyno...

If your happy with it then thats all that matters.

But blitz, Greddy, Sard & Turbosmart , all read boost pressure from the engine by vacuum hose till dashboard. Only AVCR and HKS reads them electronically using a MAP sensor correct me if im wrong??? How is the blitz quicker??? is it also closed loop???

The AVCR has all the bells and whistles built in no need to buy any extra bits but if you buy a power fc you can do even more as you no but at an added cost

As said before you can adjust the avcr to ramp up as fast or as slow as you like at any rpm in any gear so im still lost that you think its 10 years behind and has poor performance it appears to be fully adjustable or at least more adjustable then most it even monitors injector pulse to maintain stable boost, hell it want even start learning until it detects safe stable boost that's a got to be good right??? you can even set the feed back rate on its own self correction

Amongst all the other features there is even a ghost boost map graph to allow easy comparisions as well as the record function and you can have it either presented digitally in anolog or via a graph

I carnt comment on any other ebc because i've only ever used a manual bleed valve personally that i thought was crap really tbh self adjusted could'nt control the random boost spikes and creep and thought it would do more damage then good so got rid asap

I've never had any problem with any AVCR i've set up or seen any that they were slow to "ramp up" but then i would have set it up for the car and what the user wanted and i would have thought they would have said something if it was "slow"

I no people that have them and have no problem with them and have thought they out perform many other ebc on the market by leaps and bounds.

Sorry if this post sounds like im having a go but how is that 10 year behind and poor performance maybe is it to much for some people and all they want is a boost controller???

To me the AVCR is a boost controller.

Nearly all EBC's have a accurate electronic map sensor, be it internal or external... the location is not important (most high end ecus have the map sensor in cabin) and nearly all are closed loop.

It has no dedicated gain only a user programmable "openloop" duty cycle vs rpm, among other workarounds... in nearly all instances i have been able to ramp quicker withthe closed loop gain control of the Dual Solenoid blitz

All the id versions of the blitz have datalogging too in graph form with user programmable axis.. if you have the power meter you can log it against just about any input you wire it too.

TBH though the dual solenoids units by themselve's are good enough as they offer twice the sampling resolution therefore can react quicker to ramp and drop therefore eliminating all the complicated "bells and whistles" the AVCR needed to get a similar result..

haha telling people who own an AVCR that it "aint all that" will always results in favourable posts.... it would be the same if i started a thread for any make of boost controller.

Datalogging various controllers over the years has been my resource of information as is the 800-900 odd cars ive had on my dyno...

If your happy with it then thats all that matters.

Trent! What do you prefer to work with :P

Im leaning towards Gizzmo MS-IBC and I see you can supply Gizzmo too!

or second-hand blitz IDIII

Cheers :D

haha telling people who own an AVCR that it "aint all that" will always results in favourable posts.... it would be the same if i started a thread for any make of boost controller.

True but i did only ask "is it crap???" left it open for feed back

Datalogging various controllers over the years has been my resource of information as is the 800-900 odd cars ive had on my dyno...

If your happy with it then thats all that matters.

Nearly all EBC's have a accurate electronic map sensor, be it internal or external... the location is not important (most high end ecus have the map sensor in cabin) and nearly all are closed loop.

It has no dedicated gain only a user programmable "openloop" duty cycle vs rpm, among other workarounds... in nearly all instances i have been able to ramp quicker withthe closed loop gain control of the Dual Solenoid blitz

All the id versions of the blitz have datalogging too in graph form with user programmable axis.. if you have the power meter you can log it against just about any input you wire it too.

TBH though the dual solenoids units by themselve's are good enough as they offer twice the sampling resolution therefore can react quicker to ramp and drop therefore eliminating all the complicated "bells and whistles" the AVCR needed to get a similar result..

So it had close loop map sensor and a work around for gain control (in other words it has gain control) about 10 years ago and still performs well with high end more expensive ebc plus you have to buy extra add ons with the blitz where as the avcr comes with it all in one unit. Cool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Starting with issues 1 - 5, we have already run into a problem...!  Issue #4 contained 2x front brake calipers, instead of 1 caliper and 1x steering knuckle. Will have to call DeAgostini on Monday to sort it out. Anyway here's some photos.  Issue #1 is the front bumper, headlights and number plate. Issue #2 is the front wheel (with "We produced with spartan air." text on the centre cap!) and tyre, the front lip spoiler and cylinder head cover with ignition coils under the centre cover... which will never be seen again. Issue #3 is the bonnet and cylinder head. Issue #4 is the front strut, brake disc (with laser etched metal discs) and brake caliper. I stopped here because of the issue with the missing steering knuckle.  Next update will be #5 - #10 in a few weeks.
    • DeAgostini is one of a few companies that release quite large (the largest commonly available size actually) 1/8 scale models in a series of weekly issues over 100 - 110 instalments.  They release different models for different markets and DeAgostini Japan have release the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo last month. I've made two of these 1/8 scale sized cars (one an R35 GT-R from 2012 - 2014, the other I'm just about halfway through, a BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the 2Fast 2Furious movie) so when this R32 was announced there was no way I could ignore it as it's my favourite out of all Nissans.  Each issue costs around $20 so it costs about $2.2K when completed. I suppose it is very expensive for what it is, but the quality and details are really very good, and there are many "gimmicks" like fully functioning exterior and interior lights operated with a remote control, working steering, all doors/bonnet/boot/fuel lid open and close, the side mirrors fold in and it even has a speaker for the engine revving sounds when you turn the lights on.  Each issue comes with a magazine that tells the story of the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo from the first design stages of the BNR32 to Group A homologation and the various racing version that were run in the Japanese Group A and JGTC, and Australian Group A.  So I plan to update the build in this thread 5 issues at a time.  https://deagostini.jp/r32/?srsltid=AfmBOooKjxDc4EUK2rmXqMBPgyHfFJ24s4oEPJBNpnF-lFlsRoW0PE6P
    • As per title.. has anyone used so far? Keen to hear results, comparisons. In the market for a new mani for my new turbo. Any issues cracking?
    • Re read everything that has been written about this in this thread.. Let us know if you're still confused.
    • This would be a new pump with new gears. I'm just unclear on whether it's a good idea to run more oil pump flow if you don't actually need said flow. Oil level is set a minute or so after shutting off a warm engine so wouldn't the high RPM oil level in the sump end up lower all things equal? Plan is OEM clearances, main concern in my mind is whether the OEM pump can keep up with the flow requirements of any additional oil coolers.
×
×
  • Create New...