Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone

This is just a bit off a random question but wanted to clarify it.I have a r32 with an rb25det engine and box conversion done to it, it’s a standard rb25 s2 that went in, uses all standard parts including ecu and turbo..However it does have some light mods on the car.

Mods i have:

- Straight through exhaust

-Pod Filter

- FMIC

-R32 Gtr fuel pump (has been re wired to get constant 13.8-14v)

Until I save up for bigger turbo, injectors and a standalone ecu I thought I might as well use my Apexi ACVR, SAFCII to get a tune done so that I could have a bit more power out off it.

I got a tune done and got 250 rwhp @ 10 psi.. I asked that what was the restriction in the car was and they said the ecu wouldn’t allow for more boost as it would start spiking and also cause the fuel to run rich, then run lean, then rich and so on.. Also they stated that my power curve wouldn’t be smooth and would have no power until higher rpm.

Is this a common problem with the S2 motor/ecu? Is it due to the vct ?

Another reason why i am asking this is as my friends farther made 298 @ 13 psi with everything the same as mine except spit fire coil packs (he owns a r33 s1)

Thanks any help appreciated

Niran

Edited by niran

it's more likely due to R&R (rich and retard). as soon as the ECU detects that you've gone too far out of the normal envelope it pulls timing and dumps in fuel to save the motor.

if you're pushing 250rwkw you need a standalone ECU dude. don't waste your time continuing with the factory item. i'd be VERY surprised if anyone made 290kw on a genuine stock ECU even with a fuel fiddler intercept - gotta be remapped at least.

it's more likely due to R&R (rich and retard). as soon as the ECU detects that you've gone too far out of the normal envelope it pulls timing and dumps in fuel to save the motor.

if you're pushing 250rwkw you need a standalone ECU dude. don't waste your time continuing with the factory item. i'd be VERY surprised if anyone made 290kw on a genuine stock ECU even with a fuel fiddler intercept - gotta be remapped at least.

hey bud, nah not after kw? was talking about hp.. yer i know, wanting to go a Powerfc asap

the biggest problem with running more boost is you have to put more correction into the safc to bring the afr's back to normal, this adds more timing too so most of the time you cant put in enough correction without the motor pinging. i maxxed the stock turbo with a full power fc tune at 250rwhp, some make 270-280, some done. just the way it is. 298 might be bending the truth a bit tho

i'd say that there is a good chance that your mates 298hp car doesn't have a stock ecu. it has probably been remapped.

other than that, as people said, it is the protection built into the ecu that is causing you to hit the wall so to speak. whether you go a s1 or s2 ecu won't make a difference. either get yourself a PFC or a nistune if you want to go higher.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
×
×
  • Create New...