Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i rkn u might need spacers 18x9.5 +20 isnt very aggressive fitment obviously depends what you want but im running 18x9.5 +15 on the front of my 33 but it does have wide front guards but 34s have wider guards then a 33 anyway..

if that makes sense haha

well i was thinking seeing as this is my daily i cant go too crazy but when i had these wheels on the car which is 19X9.5 +20 with very very very thin profile rubber it was pretty aggressive for me

DSC_3004.jpg

on my 18's i will have 30 profile rubber with not as much stretch and the front has been lowered a little since so might work. rears i may need spacers.

What i plan on putting on the evo 18x9.5 +20 will be flush as most ppl dont run more than a 9 +30

img34391000sized.jpg

img0811u.jpg

img0805z.jpg

img0804qv.jpgi4j193.jpgfxb9d.jpg

4061536225574b790304o.jpg

3280207750f8c08926dao.jpg

img7076.jpg

Nothing looks sicker and fills out the guards better on an EVO7 - X then a set of 19" Advan RS's

These are only 18s but you get the idea...

Picture_001.jpg

18x9%2029%20Advan%20RS.jpg

The 19s just look awesome on it... fell in love with them ever since i saw a gun grey EVO 8 on JSpec a long while back with Gun Grey 19s on it, dumped... was instant jizz. On yellow, like Dezz said, Black... or gun grey.

What i plan on putting on the evo 18x9.5 +20 will be flush as most ppl dont run more than a 9 +30

img34391000sized.jpg

img0811u.jpg

img0805z.jpg

img0804qv.jpgi4j193.jpgfxb9d.jpg

4061536225574b790304o.jpg

3280207750f8c08926dao.jpg

img7076.jpg

There are TE37's yeah?

No sticker, just making sure that's all.

That would looks so nice on a EVO.

would need to go black on the yellow imo

+1

Yellow car / Black wheels.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...