Jump to content
SAU Community

Dodgy Or Genuine Buyer


Recommended Posts

Hi after recently advertising in the trading post I received a txt message including an email address asking me to contact them by, regarding my L28 c210 skyline. The email conversation is as follows-

"Hi.

I can get more pics if required.

Car is to be sold without rego or roadworthy.

Regards,

Jarryd"

And his reply,

"Jarryd,

Thanks for the prompt response.

Unfortunately, I lost the direct link to the advert on Trading Post as a result of a mandatory system update which my computer did which required it to be automatically restarted. I will be very grateful if you could send me the direct link for the advert again or possibly send me the Trading Post AdNumber as I will like to view the advert all over again.

Besides I will like to know if the car has had any mechanical faults or accidents in the past and I will be very glad to have more pix of it.

Do as well advise on the least amount you will like to give the car away as I am very interested in its quick sale.

Due to the nature of my work, I will not be able to travel out of the United kingdom to come for the inspection. I will however be needing your city, state and postal code so that I can forward it to my shipping agent here in the United Kingdom who will be coming over there for the inspection and shipping of the car.

Thanks again and hope to hear from you soon.

Kelvin."

Edited by D-limo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah dogey mate.

That 'agent' thing is a dead give away, ive seen a heap of bad sellers do this thing.

Dunno what their strategy is, but with the amount of bad sellers using the same line, i seriously doubt its validity.

Just say youre unwilling to sell to an overseas buyer...

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jarryd,

Sounds dodgy. It's not that hard to go back to the trading post and search again to find the car. 

I wouldn't respond to the email at all, at a minimum they're phishing for your email address and other details.

I liked this question, 'what is the least amount you'll give the car away for?'   :)  

cheers,

JohnH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, looks like he already has your email address...

otherwise, I would say, set up a dogdy gmail about and scambait his arse...

heaps of fun to be had stringing these lowlifes along...

see www.419eater.com

Cheers,

Daewoo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed dodgeys.

A mate found a r32 gtst on carsales recently, seller was in darwin and said he will ship the car over.

on his "location" on the add, it said port melbourne.

I knew the car with what mods it had was too good to be true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...