Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

i was just wanting to know from any of your experiences whether i need to replace my cat converter or whether it is still okay?

my problem is i had my car dyno tuned by a reputable tuner here in Adelaide, and the car fell short of what we were expecting powerwise. the car is a 89 R32 GTR and has the following mods,

Prior to TUNE

fully rebuilt engine

2860-5's

full 3inch exhaust incl front and dump pipes

3in cat (magnaflow) metal core

K&N pannel filter in stock air box

PARTS ADDED ON WHEN TUNED

Nistune ECU

Walbro fuel pump

660cc injectors

Bleed Valve

it was running 250rwkw runing 13psi boost prior to the tune.

the tune was done on my birthday in early february and it was a 37 degree day, i didnt think it would be too bad, tune the car in the worst conditions then i wouldnt have any issues with the engine detonating in hot weather.

the tuner was only able to have the car make 285rwkw runing 17psi boost, which still does feel pretty damn fast.

but he did say that when he tried to up the boost a little more to 18psi there was no difference in power, he thought that there might've been a flow issue, so he opened up the stock airbox, and did a run to see if the air filter was contributing and it made no difference.

he suggested that the cat converter might be blocked or not flowing very well. he couldn't check the cat on the day as it was hot from the dyno runs.

i took the car to an exhaust shop shortly after and had the cat dropped out and checked, the inside was all covered in carbon but it still looked to be in one piece, the metal core looked to be in good condition, the only thing was that the core was moving around in the cat, the part that attached the core to the casing had either broken or melted, so the core moves a couple millimetres within the cat.

i am just wondering whether anyone has experienced similar things with their metal cats.

i know the ceramic ones tend to breakup or melt but the metal ones are much more sturdy.

i've attached the dyno sheets of the 2 different tunes, is the wavy line in the 285rwkw one due to flow in top end?

_250rwkw____13psi.pdf

_285rwkw____17psi.pdf

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/311610-magnaflow-cat-converter-issue/
Share on other sites

BLEED VALVE!!!!!

i doubt you are holding boost very stable

get a Greddy Profect B II or something along those lines

Decat pipe or take the center out of the one you got (MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE)

3 inch does seem a bit small but is not the cause in this case but will take affect when you get up around the 300-350kw mark.

3" exhaust - too small.

3" cat - too small

Drop the exhaust from before the cat and i would be very surprised if you don't see major increases.

The turbos you have are 400rwkw on around 20-24psi with a proper motor.

BLEED VALVE!!!!!

i doubt you are holding boost very stable

get a Greddy Profect B II or something along those lines

Decat pipe or take the center out of the one you got (MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE)

3 inch does seem a bit small but is not the cause in this case but will take affect when you get up around the 300-350kw mark.

What does a bleed valve have to do with it?

I've never used a EBC and run over 350rwkw/24psi.

i've got the car booked in for a couple weeks time to be tested on the dyno again!

we're planning on doing another run with the cat on to see if there is any difference because of the weather.

then another run without the cat.

should know for sure then what is wrong.

i have also bought a Decat pipe for cheap to replace the cat if its stuffed.

just to clarify a 3in exhaust should flow enough to get within the 300-350rwkw mark?

i'm also looking at getting an EBC in the future as my mechanic told me that he wouldnt want to run much more boost without a proper controller in place to hold the boost level steady.

another side note, what will my std R32 GTR AFM's max out at?

i've got the car booked in for a couple weeks time to be tested on the dyno again!

we're planning on doing another run with the cat on to see if there is any difference because of the weather.

then another run without the cat.

should know for sure then what is wrong.

i have also bought a Decat pipe for cheap to replace the cat if its stuffed.

just to clarify a 3in exhaust should flow enough to get within the 300-350rwkw mark?

i'm also looking at getting an EBC in the future as my mechanic told me that he wouldnt want to run much more boost without a proper controller in place to hold the boost level steady.

another side note, what will my std R32 GTR AFM's max out at?

Quick look through the RB26 dyno thread showed me few guys running stock GTR afms at 280rwkw, but everyone I saw over 300rwkw had upgraded theirs.

I think for your goal power you should definitely upgrade them.

Is there any reason why you are sticking with the 3" exhaust?

Ignore the comment from your tuner about a proper EBC, spend the money on a bigger exhaust and some upgraded afms. $28 turbotech boost valve is all you need.

i got the 3 inch exhaust done when i first bought the car. the old one needed replacing because it had holes, i got a 3inch stainless chucked on.

i was told by the guys at the exhaust place that even if i had a 3.5 cat back it would still only flow as much as the front pipe would let it.

and if the front pipe when the two connect only is a 3 inch it would only flow as much as the smallest diameter in the exhaust.

yeah you need a bigger front pipe then as well. from what i have read on this forum the 34 gtr dump pipes are a great upgrade too.

you have chosen some very hardcore turbos and it seems strange to limit them so much.

theres a thread on here with an article from a garrett engineer about how important it is to have a big enough exhaust for your turbos. also that exhaust after the turbo cannot be too big performance wise, although there are obviously size restrictions and minimal gains once you go above a certain size.

there is a lot of info here, first thing I would do is read through the rb26 dyno thread and see what exhaust people are running for each power level. there is a lot of info there. that will also tell you whether you need larger afms, whether an EBC is required etc etc.

another side note, what will my std R32 GTR AFM's max out at?

They max out of resolution at around 280kw or so, but they can flow much more. If you tune past that point it can be risky, so you'd want to be much more conservative in the tune. Since -5s go way past 280 you should upgrade AFMs (after the exhaust is sorted).

3" is not big enough for -5's.

As i said, -5's are a ~400rwkw turbo on a good motor, you need ideally a 2.5" front pipes that merge into a 4" exhaust to allow sufficient flow.

If you only want 300-350rwkw then you've chosen the wrong turbos for a start...

Also putting it back on without dropping the exhaust because it "might be the weather" is pointless.

Drop the exhaust from the front pipe (where the CAT would attach) and give it a run. Sounds like you should see markedly improved results given your description thus far.

  • 2 weeks later...

hey guys!

i got the car dyno'd yesterday.

we took the cat off and replaced with a decat.

the car made less power initially because the tune was out,

it made 260rwkw instead of 285rwkw

then after a little bit of tweaking to the fuel maps the car was back on 285rwkw with better turbo response.

but we noticed the smell of fuel from the engine, we noticed that the injector o-rings were being blown out by the boost, so we had to put some spacers on the injectors to hold the o-rings in there tighter, after that the tune was out again.

but with more fiddling the car made over 300rwkw.

the boost was turned up and it peaked at 19psi then came down and hovered around 18psi. i'm runing a bleed valve.

it is now making consistently over 300rwkw with better response.

the best run hit 319rwkw.

very happy with it.

thanks for your help guys.

the car is very fast now,

hey guys!

i got the car dyno'd yesterday.

we took the cat off and replaced with a decat.

the car made less power initially because the tune was out,

it made 260rwkw instead of 285rwkw

then after a little bit of tweaking to the fuel maps the car was back on 285rwkw with better turbo response.

but we noticed the smell of fuel from the engine, we noticed that the injector o-rings were being blown out by the boost, so we had to put some spacers on the injectors to hold the o-rings in there tighter, after that the tune was out again.

but with more fiddling the car made over 300rwkw.

the boost was turned up and it peaked at 19psi then came down and hovered around 18psi. i'm runing a bleed valve.

it is now making consistently over 300rwkw with better response.

the best run hit 319rwkw.

very happy with it.

thanks for your help guys.

the car is very fast now,

Nice work! Sounds like your happy with it.

If you ever do want more power you know that just changing your exhaust and a retune will net some big results. Not just peak power either as you discovered, as well as increased peak power you will also get less lag!

Edited by Harey
Nice work! Sounds like your happy with it.

If you ever do want more power you know that just changing your exhaust and a retune will net some big results. Not just peak power either as you discovered, as well as increased peak power you will also get less lag!

thanks!!

yeah, i know there are things i can do to gain more power.

GTR's are an awesome car to mod, and huge power can be achieved.

but i am at a point now where i wanted to be since i first got the car, and that was to build a 300rwkw street car. now i have it, but its come at a pretty big cost. motor rebuild, turbos, ecu, injectors, fuel pump, etc

the list goes on, i've spent a lot of money and to finally achieve the power level i wanted is great. and i also have upgraded tyres, rims and suspension.

who know's maybe down the track i might still want to empty my wallet into the car, but for now i am going to enjoy it.

and i just gotta say it, horay for Nissans!! GTR's really do deliver on being an awesome car from stock that has potential to become a real serious street machine.

i f ing love my GTR!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
    • Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
    • Yep that is correct. It allows you to adjust the short throw range from what I can tell
×
×
  • Create New...