Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Still under 2k on the odometer. $70000 plus take over the lease @1500/Mth for 33wks with $80000 residual. Please PM me.

Is there actually such a thing as "taking over a lease"??

How much do you need to get for the car?

Im looking for a white R35 right now.

Kev

Does that work out at $162,000 for the car? think i got my sums right... :thumbsup:

Less than that in present value dollar terms. You need to take the interest thats factored into the payments into account. Deduct approx $4-5K.

And stamp duty is also dependent on the state you're in.

Edited by fungoolie

is everyones summs out of whack because I got a much higher value than $170k when you add in the risidual, i got just under 200K + stamp duty ect...

either way there are cars from $159000 drive away without negotiating and accept trade ins, only prob is they have double the milage (4000km instead of 2000).

http://www.carsales.com.au/all-cars/demo/d...2&silo=1011

is everyones summs out of whack because I got a much higher value than $170k when you add in the risidual, i got just under 200K + stamp duty ect...

Not sure how you arrived at that figure. Without stuffing around with net present value calculations all you do is add the first payment and residual so say $150K. Then add the $12000 worth of instalments. So even without the interest component being taken into consideration it's $162K plus ORC. As I said earlier, interest on the outstanding $80K over less than a year is less than $5K.

Edited by fungoolie
Not sure how you arrived at that figure. Without stuffing around with net present value calculations all you do is add the first payment and residual so say $150K. Then add the $12000 worth of instalments. So even without the interest component being taken into consideration it's $162K plus ORC. As I said earlier, interest on the outstanding $80K over less than a year is less than $5K.

ahh I misread it, I read it as 1500/month for 33 months, instead of weeks.... I was wrong.

Still $180k for a car that didn't cost that much more to buy brand new in the colours and extras you want? Its way over priced dude. I know that Rick Damelian held his 2009 ADM GTR for 4 motnhs advertised @ $159 000 + transfers ect... It sat there for ages then they took $155 000 drive away transfers included.

If you need the money soon I think its best you get what you can for it now and cut your losses, expensive cars arn't selling too good these days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
×
×
  • Create New...