Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive got an R33 GTS4, had it for a year and a bit now, and ive had not one bit of trouble with it. Hell if he's looking for a coupe why not go the sedan, there good looking, handle as well, and yourve got 4 doors for your drunken mates to stumble into!!

Parts are easily accessible, and a decent price, Im talking bout parts for servicing/maintainence.

Fuelwise there like most other cars in their capacity, if you flog them, they will drink fuel.

Handling, boy o boy, what a step up from driving a Mitsu express :D Just kiddin, they handle like a dream.

If he's young too, the skyline is a very easy car to do some minor "rice" mods.

If your nephew wants one, i say go for it, if you dont go and own one today, you might not have the chance tommorow. But as always. Check out the car, run it through inspection ect ect.

Goodluck in your search.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31224-r33-na-any-good/#findComment-630823
Share on other sites

I had an N/A R33 GTS (RB20E) for 2 years. Great car, never missed a beat. Only downside was a lack of power (130 PS standard in a car that weighs quite a bit).

Still, it was a skyline. I'd definitely recommend them for anyone on a budget, young drivers and so forth. If you want power, I'd got for the GTS25 (2.5 litre) it's twin cam and the tuning potential is better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31224-r33-na-any-good/#findComment-636607
Share on other sites

n/a R33 skylines have very low power and torque for their weight and will be easily chopped by v6 family cars such as camry's and magnas

Yeah but keep in mind that they are 500cc to 1 litre down in capacity. If you want the power get a turbo model, simple as that. But if you want something much cheaper to buy and insure, then the NA version is still a very nice car.

Unfortunately most people that get one seem to get bitten by the turbo bug before too long and start asking about how they can stick a turbo on it :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31224-r33-na-any-good/#findComment-637898
Share on other sites

I know peak power isn't telling the whole story, but the GTS25 Type S (http://imports.motortraders.net/imports/sp...spec.asp?id=655) has a slightly higher power/weight ratio than a VT series 1 Commodore Executive with the V8 option. The SS weighs even more. It'd be no match for a LS1 powered Commy, but it's still respectable.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31224-r33-na-any-good/#findComment-639499
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
    • This seems like a pointless exercise. There is no E30 availability. Ongoing availability of E85 should not be assumed. Flex-fuel is the only sensible approach, so you can use E85 when and where you can get it, 98 when that's al you can get, and anything in between as you fill it up and drain it down. And if that means replacing the pumps, fitting a flex capable sensor/ECU/whatever has to be done to these Renault shitboxen, then.....so be it?
    • Sorry, I wasn't very clear.....just that the standard injectors are apparently good over 600rwhp/450rwkw which you won't get to on standard turbos anyway.....they are much better sized from factory than we are used to in RBs.
    • I'm not sure where you are, but United Terrey Hills has E85. 
×
×
  • Create New...