Jump to content
SAU Community

Best Tyres For Sprint And Time Trials


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah the 2nd type grows in the "backward".

Anyhoo

I have a set of 2nd hand dunlop formula Rs yet to see how they go but bang for buck a bit over 200 bucks for 6 slicks is a bargain imo.

I just hope it doesnt rain lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah the 2nd type grows in the "backward".

Anyhoo

I have a set of 2nd hand dunlop formula Rs yet to see how they go but bang for buck a bit over 200 bucks for 6 slicks is a bargain imo.

I just hope it doesnt rain lol

AhhhhHUH! Same guy, nice catch :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone is still running 235/45/17's the re55s can be had for $350 a tyre

at present. Not sure if its all 3 compounds but i know for sure they

have sr2's [hard] for that price, which is the pick for weekend warriors anyway!

Good buying i say, there is a group buy on Evolutionoz, having said that

a few of the boys have been grabbing them for that figure from other

suppliers also.

Cheers..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im just going by what the distributor nsw told me, they had to run 42 psi!

bit late....but this is spot on for Kumho v70A

We used to run these as control tyres and they perform better at road tyre like pressure....we used to run between 42 and 44 hot pressure. In fact performance did not drop of hugely right up to 48-50psi. Very unusual but I can't argue with the lap times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bit late....but this is spot on for Kumho v70A

We used to run these as control tyres and they perform better at road tyre like pressure....we used to run between 42 and 44 hot pressure. In fact performance did not drop of hugely right up to 48-50psi. Very unusual but I can't argue with the lap times.

Well I've got a supersprint this weekend at Wakefield Park and I will try running a bit more pressure in them to see how it goes.

Previously I've only run a maximum of 35 psi hot in the V70A's and the tyre wear was nice and even. I don't have a pyrometer so can't comment on how hot the tyre was getting in places.

If it means I'll gain a bit in lap times Duncan, it's worth a try. :happy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe too late for this weekend.

but there are the 3rd best tyres I have run behind dz03g and re55s, and they are 30-50% cheaper. so a clear winner on cost/performance. If you have to win (ie cost is not a factor), the other 2 are the only option.

Like I said I ran 42-44 for best results on the gtr....but heavier cars like commonwhore ran even higher with good results. of course we are way outside sensible/manufacturer recommendations....just saying what actually works with these tyres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what happened with these tyres in the past few years by way of history.

around 5+ years ago the v700 were the control tyre for IPRA. those guys get every last 10th out of their cars due to fairly restrictive rules and they found these tyres were actually pretty good. But especially so when buffed (ie some of the "new" tread depth removed). So everyone started peeling 70% of the tyre off, got good performance, but they were expensive to run becuase after the buffing they would only last 1 or at the most 2 meets before being below the tread depth indicators. they still worked fine at that level, almost like slicks, but were not legal because there was not enough tread left.

in the years since, for whatever reason, they were not used much or well regarded. I think this was a mistake, the v700/v70A are a good tyre. Some people like Ben, and for that matter Tony Sullens used them for good effect at events like targa (especially the soft compound).

2 years ago kumho V70A won the production car control tyre contract in NSW from yokohama. That is where I first met them and used 4 sets over 6 rounds trying different pressures etc. There were a further 30 cars running them including the commodores like I said. We found by accident and rumour that they worked best hot (ie people accidently letting them get too high, finding good results then checking pressure to their surprise). Mine definately worked better at that pressure but some guys literally run them at 50+psi getting the best results. Make no mistake these guys are dead serious about lap times because the front running cars are very similar, they would not run these pressure unless they gave results. John from fsport was obviously all over the pressures and results people were getting - no wonder he recommends high pressures too

However, in the low profile tyres (35 and under, like 265.35.18) they started to fail at these pressures. the distributor rightly pointed to over inflation but in the end, due to perceived ureliability they were ditched as the control tyre for safety reason. we now run an open tyre list and the same cars are running 1 or even 2 seconds quicker on the same tracks using dz03G or re55.

no disrespect to ben's experience (hell he can farm potatoes like no-one I know), but targa experience and track testing/development are totally different. there is absolutely no doubt these tyres work better at much higher pressures than others. FWIW I run the dunlops at 32-34psi so I am not some crazy high pressure fetishist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never used AD08 but I have done some track work on high end street tyres. They generally work best with high pressures too (and low aspect ratios) to make up for weaker sidewalls. If I don't have a starting point I use the following guide:

Street Tyres: 38-42

Semi Slicks: 30-34

Slicks: 28-32

Of course lots of tyres are different, and the heavier the car, the more pressure is needed. But it is a good starting point.

Duncan what works with the r35 dunlops? being run flats I guess the rules are different again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
    • For that influx of Spammers we had I made no pic posting and no PM's for first ten posts. This is group based and I've manually updated @Beanie to the Members group which will open up the images and PM's. 
    • Thx for the reassuring reply. I’ve got above legal clearance  going in for roadworthy Friday… fingers crossed it’s keeping me awake  bloody nanny state 
    • I was actually going to try and dig out a datalog with turbine speed and EMAP haha
    • Wait until @Lithium posts a compressor map and tries to explain what's going on. There is a strong possibility that the OP lives in a digital world and is not comfortable with analogue machines. A turbo is just about as analogue as it gets, with plenty of non-linear behaviours added in on top. Most of us who think we know how they work are actually only getting by on 2nd and 3rd order mental models that abstract away from the actual physics and bring it back to the sort of kindergarten level concepts we can hold in our heads. This is important when you need to hold 10 such concepts in your head at the same time. You need to reduce the complexity of the individual concepts to allow them to be simultaneously held and manipulated. Too much complexity in the base models makes it very difficult to make them work with each other mentally.
×
×
  • Create New...