Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just realised... I thought you were going for 2 Bar SuperStar? Why only 24PSi now?

Oh and steve... My 880s on 98 are already hitting 70% dc from the calcs I did... And that was on 14psi only revving to 6500...

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well the exhaust is restrictive now so a bigger one is needed, the kw's were going up with more boost but not by much cause its choking so instead of stressing it out for every last kw, Yavuz made it safe enough to hammer everyday and turned the boost down.

Also, its pretty much quick enough for street duties as it is so why bother with more. Ive pretty much done what i set out to do on this motor, if i find a nice 4" exhaust thats another tune :banana:

Your fuel system just wont cope, ID's :D

No. I grew up on Oatley Bay and had friends round Connells Point and Kyle Bay. Haven't heard bout the N1 yet ,but Knowing my guys it will be pretty close to landing

Ah cool cool!

That's such an awesome buy, are you keeping it stock or going to town on it? It's a great base to work with :)

Steve... going by the injector sizes im assuming thats on E85?

You assumed correct.

Based on the boost it ended up on, it shouldve stayed pump98 but can be switched over at anytime (did tunes for both, just need to flash the ecu)

Steve, is that torque graph right? Looks to be 730nm...

Yep 730nm at wheels. Tractive effort was sky high, but that's not the number that matters.

Why doesn't it look right to you?

Yep 730nm at wheels. Tractive effort was sky high, but that's not the number that matters.

Why doesn't it look right to you?

i was just questioning the number mate, nothing more :)

my previous gtr with 26bottom end & gtrs's made 750nm torque...my current 30bottom end with -10s makes 930nm.

our kw are almost identical but the nm is very different? maybe my ported made the difference?

would a similar engine setup with e85 @ 24psi (i.e. yours) v's 98 @ 24psi (i.e. mine) impact the peak torque? maybe its just a case that e85 truly works better on higher boost?

Marko do you have more graphs?

I'd like to overlay them and see what differences there are

the only graph i have is here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/post-a235105-

i might have another 1 @ home, let me check later a/h

just to add, 405awkw = approx. 450rwkw (it was 1 of the 1st q's i asked my tuner when it was done on his dyno, my mates who drive fords & holdens always ask "whats kw is that rear wheels?")

Edited by Marko R1

I think the port job would be making some difference but the tune and turbos would play more of a large part.

It's not peak figures I'm looking at, i want to see what they're both making at every 500rpm point so yeah if you've got one and can send it that would be great.

How do you know it's 930nm without a graph though? A lot of people think the N on the side axis is torque, it's tractive effort not torque

jim (tuner) told me that the shown axis on my graph is in fact torque.

i'll see what else i have at home but come to think of it, im 99% sure the other 2 graphs are KW v's AFR & KW v's PSI

sorry steve, this thread is about your car & not mine :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...