Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

holy short gearing!

Not really, that would be 1:1 (4th gear) on a 4.1-4.3 diff.

Youve been looking at GTR graphs too much zeeb lol.

And yes, thats a nice result. Good to see them making respectable power at decent boost levels.

  • 2 weeks later...

fair enough...but a random YouTube vid with a vague description doesn't prove anything...for all we know the car has a 100 shot of gas.

I don't mean to sound cynical but for every good Precision result there seems to be a bad one too.

I dont doubt they are a good turbo...but they are no better than Garrett/BW/MHI etc

they all have good and bad points, But I really hate people jumping up and down about how good X brand turbo is.

Well good news Zebra, I happened to be there that day for a HPI shoot and guess what, there was no gas. Well actually there could have been, but I didn't check under the dash for a sneaky Pete bottle...

It was pointed out earlier that they don't seem to make power on "reasonable" boost levels so I demonstrated a couple of cases that show the opposite. No jumping up and down here.

The precisions will want a lot of boost and you are risking your factory motor in the event of a minor fauxpas. For 400kw you will want to look at a 3788R, it is the replacement for 35Rish spool and more than T04Z power. You must run it in its twin scroll form.

ha,

my old man's 32 GTR is making 500hp @ the wheels on a measly 19psi with a stock bottem end and straight 98 from the bowser on a precision 6262. and this was done with the biggest heap of shit exhaust maniold which is a hks low mount cast log style. sick of seeing people whinge about how these turbos need like 40psi to make power and just by reading reviews from other people saying they are shit becuase they probley dont have the correct supporting mods to reap the full bennifit of the turbo.

^ A lot of people don't seem to understand that often when dyno results rely on lots of boost to make numbers its often the engine/boltons combination which isn't up to it, as opposed to the turbo itself... though the element of truth to the likes of PT6262s "needing lots of boost" is that they do come into their own at really high boost levels, naturally using a decent fuel to help the engine stay happy at those boost levels.

Hypothetically speaking, if a GT35R could hit 450kw on E85 and a PT6262 hit 500kw on the same engine with E85 - both on 2+bar of boost, wouldn't mean that if you ran both turbos on pump gas using 20psi you'd make 10+% more power with the PT6262.... more likely you'd make about the same.

ha,

my old man's 32 GTR is making 500hp @ the wheels on a measly 19psi with a stock bottem end and straight 98 from the bowser on a precision 6262. and this was done with the biggest heap of shit exhaust maniold which is a hks low mount cast log style. sick of seeing people whinge about how these turbos need like 40psi to make power and just by reading reviews from other people saying they are shit becuase they probley dont have the correct supporting mods to reap the full bennifit of the turbo.

Mind = Blown

Yes lithium, correct. But at the end of the day wouldent you rather a turbo that has the "same performance" as a 35r on mild boost and pump fuel, but if you ever wanted to switch over to e85 and crank some in it that it's ready to make numbers, not having to change to a larger turbo setup.

Exhibit A- the guy who was disappointed about his 5557 result and all you guys saying it was a shit result and a bad turbo for pump fuel, and it ended up him having a collapsed muffer. Hahahahh made me laugh how you's are quick to point the finger.

Anyway your loss is my gain. We are all more then happy with the turbos.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Is there a way to adjust all of the pedals in an R32 GTS-T? they all sit even, but seem to be a little high for my liking.
    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
×
×
  • Create New...