Precision Billet Turbos

[Mitcho_7]

Is it for a long term project or can we expect numbers reasonably soon?

[Piggaz]

Is it for a long term project or can we expect numbers reasonably soon?

Engine should be getting built now.

Yours is on that order too Al. The brackets just arrived too!

[Mitcho_7]

Engine should be getting built now.

Sounds legit, got a build thread going at all?

[Piggaz]

Yeah man. "piglets rebuild of his busted Tomei 2.8". Page two unless its been posted in today.

[GTScotT]

Lately I am thinking a scientific expedition to try a 5558 .48 on my pissy SR.

Most ppl have tried them with .64s but I think the .48 is intended for the little 2L mob.

[GTR_JOEY]

Thread bump.

Oh, someone may or may not have placed an order for a 6466 split rear 0.84 today!

Now I'll have someone on my side in the twin vs single arguments

[Deano 1]

I never thought I'd see the day that Paul went a dirty single.....

[Piggaz]

Can always put the twins back on Deano, but after the SR result we saw last week AND Jez's it's pretty hard to not open your eyes.

[Deano 1]

Mate if I was you I would have done it a year ago, I hate my -5s I should have went single from the start. But than I also like not having to worrie about the cops.

What exhuast you gunna run? Or you going to adapt the RPM one?

[Piggaz]

Mate if I was you I would have done it a year ago, I hate my -5s I should have went single from the start. But than I also like not having to worrie about the cops.

What exhuast you gunna run? Or you going to adapt the RPM one?

There is an issue SOMEWHERE in your setup. 330 on 5's is a little below par.

Well the RP one is twin 3 inch all the way. I'm thinking about not running the twin's front pipes, coming out the back of the turbo in a 4 inch then splitting that into a twin 3 inch to meet up with the "catback". Each gate will pluimb into 1 of the 3 inch pipes.

The SR result im reffering two, we overlayed my 2.8 and 5's. This SR with a 6262 had MORE bottom end grunt and made an extra 10 kw up top.

[SimonR32]

The SR result im reffering two, we overlayed my 2.8 and 5's. This SR with a 6262 had MORE bottom end grunt and made an extra 10 kw up top.

Would love to see the overlay!

[Deano 1]

The SR result im reffering two, we overlayed my 2.8 and 5's. This SR with a 6262 had MORE bottom end grunt and made an extra 10 kw up top.

lol thats just farken crazy

[Deano 1]

There is an issue SOMEWHERE in your setup. 330 on 5's is a little below par.

i no man, ill work it out one day, got a new exhuast coming and a new intake setup. So ill try that out, and c how it goes. If nothing improves ill just drive it as it is, till Stevo comes up with the goods on the bits and peaces to make her a lil bigger on the bottom end if you no what i mean, than prob throw the -5s in the bin lol

im very interested to c how this turns out but

[Mitcho_7]

Precision turbos are getting a lot of love recently, but with the results they are putting I think it's definently justified.

Is there a reason they aren't as common as Garrett's? Like we're they not to good back in the day or something along those lines?

[Lithium]

^ Good question. I've followed US/Euro results for years and bleated on about some of the results people had been getting wth FP and Precision turbos for years and said the Garrett GTX turbos have been too little too late but for a large part seems to have fallen on deaf ears MOSTLY here, got the typical "inflated dyno figures" speels. Understandable that people need to see the results from familiar environments and setups, but that is probably largely why they haven't spread around this part of the world so much. Overseas in the EVO/Supra world they are EVERYWHERE.

[jet_r31]

Its also alot to do with the parity of the dollar, i have bought a one, yrs ago, and sold it and i bought a innovate turbo yrs ago from the U.S

when they where the "big" thing, but they where crazy money compared to garrets once you changed the dollar over and imported

compared to a garret here.

The other part is people talked out of there absolute arse about them on here without even trying them..with all the inflated dyno and need mega

high boost to work bullshit..its given me a good laugh lately.with the all results coming forth ...lol

cheers

darren

[R31Nismoid]

There is an issue SOMEWHERE in your setup. 330 on 5's is a little below par.

A little? lol... A LOT!

Be interesting to see what you think, going to have the -5s running first for a month and then do back to backs?

Given you are changing head etc

[Piggaz]

A little? lol... A LOT!

Be interesting to see what you think, going to have the -5s running first for a month and then do back to backs?

Given you are changing head etc

I'm still undecided Ash. It's a lot of work and a lot of dicking around.

Part of me thinks I've gone too big but if a SR is matching my -5 effort then I think I can go up one size, given I have 500 cc over that particular result. If it is too big well I'll drop back to 6262 or 6266.

[34GeeTeeTee]

Went for a run with Kurtis, now a big fan of precision haha

[NYTSKY]

Thread bump.

Oh, someone may or may not have placed an order for a 6466 split rear 0.84 today!

A decision you will not regret