Jump to content
SAU Community

Precision Billet Turbos


Recommended Posts

not suprised, being auto...my 4294 with a .91 T6 housing wasn't any laggier than a 3540 1.06 on a RB30 single cammer really with a auto

only a split second was a 3540 better and then the 3540 got fiercely trodden on...

Edited by jet_r31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed that drag+auto = a totally different ball game when it comes to response. its got very little in common with response on a street or circuit car.

have had a 3076 on an old school 4 pot feel as responsive as a T25 SR with the right cam and stall combo. easy to do, just useless around a bend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a 35r on a 6boost mani, I changed to a new 6boost mani and 7175, and it is more responsive In every way, makes more power earlier, power doesnt drop off, and builds boost on the tbrake significantly faster....

Must be moving on from older technology that did it...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tossing up between a 6262, 6266 and 6466 on a stock capacity RB26... Looking for good response and 400-450rwkw on moderate boost 20-25psi

T4 0.82 divided rear... Want most of the boost all in by 4000rpm

Also is everyone just going journal bearing or running the ball bearing? I don't mind the extra cost if it's worth it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tossing up between a 6262, 6266 and 6466 on a stock capacity RB26... Looking for good response and 400-450rwkw on moderate boost 20-25psi

T4 0.82 divided rear... Want most of the boost all in by 4000rpm

Also is everyone just going journal bearing or running the ball bearing? I don't mind the extra cost if it's worth it

Well after Jez's result on his standard 26, it'll be hard to go past the 6262. He made 402 at just over 20 -21 psi IIRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen some photos of the 66mm cea turbine next to their older stuff... I'd be highly tempted as the aero looks great.

Question in my mind is 62 vs 64 compressor in terms of lag. Id be tempted to just go a 6466 for the headroom, coz u know u will end up with a dirty 30 lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen some photos of the 66mm cea turbine next to their older stuff... I'd be highly tempted as the aero looks great.

Question in my mind is 62 vs 64 compressor in terms of lag. Id be tempted to just go a 6466 for the headroom, coz u know u will end up with a dirty 30 lol

When I was comparing my 6466 to a 6262 a few weeks ago, the angle on the blades looked a little different but also the gap between the blades on the intake were signicantly more of the 6466. Both were CEA's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm thats indicating its more than just a change in trim, the 64mm comp must have a way bigger exducer than the 62mm so its more or less an entirely difference turbo.

Like comparing a 3076 and 3082 I guess. Same stuff, different application entirely.

A link to a page with comparison to old tech 65mm wheel (I think the 62mm turbine is same tech) and compared to new 66 CEA turbine:

http://realstreetperformance.com/store/precision-billet-cea-6266-turbo-750hp-turbocharger-2709.html?zenid=59df912a5cff403c6491d3cf5176bc7c

FYI both 6262 and 6266 are rated as 700HP items. I'd be chasing that 66 CEA item, better tech is where its at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally got the 5558 in today, can I use any 3" v-band flange off ebay (exhaust/dump side), and what oil line/fitting did you guys use - do I just go to Pirtek/Enzed or get an ebay jobbie - re: Kando lines fit? I am not sure if you just connect the oil line to part way in the existing line or get rid of existing and new one straight to block? thanks :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, yeah, nah. Speakers have a nominal impedance of 8 ohm that looks more like 6.4 ohm when measured. The receiver's amplifiers (all channels) are all rated to 6 ohm (I think, it's been a long time since I cared). The real problem is that many modern class D amps have aggressive protection circuitry that cuts off the fun if they think too much current is being drawn. And with my speakers having series crossovers, as opposed to more typical parallel crossovers, and big TL enclosures, they can certainly dip down to lower impedances at some frequencies and that easily triggers the protection. Pioneer receivers are somewhat famous for it, but even Denon, Onkyo, et al, all have many complaints against them across various models. It only does it when listening to music at high levels. You have to be putting your ears at risk to do it. But sometimes I want to do that. If I was serious about using it as a listening room I'd simply upgrade the amp for the front pair to a nice Rotel or something, and just use the receiver for signal handling and processing - although that would be a bit of a pain in the arse too. Have to switch on more shit, pre-amp volume vs main amp volume, etc etc.
    • yeah pretty much, stopped playing after lightfall, couldnt be bothered with the final shape...  ran that game into the ground for years... bit of a shame.. the  story was awesome. was playing a lot of trials but the hackers became tooo much, ruined the game.  
    • This is why you don't get invited to press events.         Kodi
    • For example, you’ll need this approval if: you’re a car enthusiast looking to import a specialist vehicle or an older car you want to bring your vehicle with you when you move to Australia you manufacture or import special purpose vehicles or a small number of trailers each year.       Tutuapp 9Apps
    • I reckon you are 100% right on the money. The only reason I bought Red Sport instead of the base VR30 is that I am investigating racing it in Production Cars, and they require you to run a (mostly) standard car....therefore knowing exactly what was in the RS spec was important to me and I paid the extra. Other than that, for sure I would have pocketed the $10k and spent them on mods instead. Plus the non-RS models are more likely to have had a nicer life prior. Just a warning though, mods always cost twice as much as they look like they will on paper BTW you should also consider the 400R imports, they are about the same price as a local RS but 5+ years newer. Of course that comes with the usual warnings about finding parts, unhelpful nissan dealers and finding insurance
×
×
  • Create New...