Jump to content
SAU Community

Precision Billet Turbos

R32GTR/Iceland
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ðemons Contributor

Ðemons

Posted
Posted

Good ? on comp Ratio as it hasnt been tested since the built to be honest it has sat in the shed for 3 years with doing nothing. It comes out sometimes & getz fair up it down this road I know quite well. Head work ported Polished supertech vavles. It made 450KW with the HKS To4Z strapped to the side of it with race Fuel 23psi.

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

SimonR32
SimonR32

The 6262 sillyness is never ending... New cams just got the most power and torque it's ever made

SimonR32
SimonR32
Mick_o
Mick_o

Dale is 100% correct its a well proven fact that smaller cams in RB's aid in response. Even going from a stock cam to a type b pon cam will cost you response. Been many track guys that have thrown the

Posted Images

Ryan1200 Proficient

Ryan1200

Posted
Posted

Twin scroll ryan 4inch inlet & 3inch out from memory. Has 3.5 inch exhaust but not that thats going to matter its coming straight out of gate so should sound the goods lol.

Cool can't wait to see your results trying to decide whether the 6766 is going to be too small for my new 3.2L thats in the build ATM ;)

Lithium Grand Master

Lithium

Posted
Posted

1000 flywheel hp or as close as I can't get with good spool

What fuel? If on E85 then the Precision PT6466 seems to be the man for shooting in that area - basically every result I've seen for that turbo have been exceptional "for what it is". PT6766 CEA will do it and with a bit of change and a bit more lag, Forced Performance GT3794HTA is not a Precision turbo but I reckon from what I've seen makes me think they have a compressor map more suited to RBs (and 2JZs) - a little wider flow in the 30-40psi boost range (the Precisions definitely need more boost to make these power levels), and they sound awesome. A SLIGHT (ie 100 or so rpm) bit more lag than the two Precision turbos though.

34GeeTeeTee Grand Master

34GeeTeeTee

Posted
Posted

Going on a roller (dyno dynamics) tomorrow... Ewwww :(

I'll try and get a run on current tune with same fueling to see roller vs hubber before we play with boost

Awesome :)

SimonR32 Grand Master

SimonR32

Posted
Posted

+1 actually, I've been treating the difference between these two as ~11% (so 600hp @ hubs = 534whp/399rwkw) so will be interesting to see how close this is.

There used to be a fairly well proven 7-8% difference between the hub dyno and a roller, we could repeat it every time.

The hub dyno we use has now been updated with new software and corrections (the 600hp run was done with this) and they are meant to read similar now.

Lithium Grand Master

Lithium

Posted
Posted

Ahh cool, good to know - I had partly based that number off what SAU people insisted when comparing hub dynos and otherwise but have been starting to get suspicious after seeing trap speeds of cars run on DD being much closer to cars with similar Dynapack numbers (ie, my own) but had used that partly because of avoiding angsty Aussies complaining about inflated numbers :)

Keen to hear the results anyway, especially when you nudge the boost up!

SimonR32 Grand Master

SimonR32

Posted
Posted (edited)

Well that was a bit of a fail, there is an issue with the dyno and even with 4wd set to 50/50 torque split the thing was doing burnouts as soon as it came on boost...

Ended up going 560hp but started spinning at 550hp and pretty much flat lined from there. Would have been well over 600awhp on 24psi if it had traction :)

Edited by SimonR32
Frosty Grand Master

Frosty

Posted
Posted

Well that was a bit of a fail, there is an issue with the dyno and even with 4wd set to 50/50 torque split the thing was doing burnouts as soon as it came on boost...

Ended up going 560hp but started spinning at 550hp and pretty much flat lined from there. Would have been well over 600awhp on 24psi if it had traction :)

put 20 fat kids in the back! dont comment until we have results!!! :P

this is still with the 6262 yeah simon?

SimonR32 Grand Master

SimonR32

Posted
Posted

put 20 fat kids in the back! dont comment until we have results!!! :P

this is still with the 6262 yeah simon?

No access to 20 fat kids so it'll have to do. The power was almost ramping vertically when it started spinning and then hovered around 550awhp from 5500-8500.

Yeah 6262 T4 divided 0.8 rear

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GabsReDeal
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) clogged cat

      By GabsReDeal · Posted

      Hey everyone, This is my first post apart of the introduction. I tried searching a bit on the forum but couldn't really get a straight answer. I got the car to my mechanic as I felt it being weak. It seems that it was missing on two cylinders due to the injectors. I had all my injectors clean and the car runs much better. The mechanic also confirmed my suspicions that the cat is clogged and needs to be tackled asap. The cat rattles a bit and the hot exhaust warning frequently lights up when driving after getting the injectors clean. In my introduction I was asked about what modification I might be interested in and mentioned a cat delete. From what I was told, this is not really beneficial on the RB20DE and there are more cons than pros.  Could perhaps anyone give some suggestions on what the best course of action would be since the current cat is toast and needs to be removed/replaced anyway? I can also sometimes smell a strong smell of fuel, but I'm not sure if this is related.
    • Milkmun
      NC MX5

      By Milkmun · Posted

      Hope the cans went down well at least 
    • Milkmun
      Neil's R33 Gts-t Build

      By Milkmun · Posted

      255 can't go wrong with the price.
    • Kinkstaah
      Neil's R33 Gts-t Build

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      When I was replacing my pump due to being stranded in the wrong state, I went with the Deatschwerks 320lph kit. It is a direct plug in to the stock wires, harness, everything. It comes with a plug... but you can plug the OEM plug directly into this thing. https://justjap.com/products/deatschwerks-dw300-fuel-pump-nissan-s13-silvia-r32-r33-r34-skyline-c34-stagea?currency=AUD Downside: Won't actually flow that much on boost if you want to push it on E85, but it's comparable to the 040/255 etc. Little more actually.
    • GTSBoy
      Neil's R33 Gts-t Build

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I dunno what the "best" one is....but when my 040 died late last year, after about 20 years of screaming service....I put in a 255. Like any such thing, you have to finagle it a little bit - it's not a no-brain swap. But it's not hard.
×
×
  • Create New...