Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I have finally booked the GTR in to get the PT6262 fitted.
I will finally have my own results to post in here..

Not chasing a power figure, will be adding new Cams, Cam Gears, Fuel system & ECU
starting out on 20psi and see how it all goes.

Going in my 34 GTR
6 boost Manifold, 50mm Progate & 6262 with .84
Haltech PS2000 ECU & IQ3 Logger dash to replace the MFD
New fuel system & some cams, cam gears and a few other bits and pieces.
Will post up a before & after run, looking forward to having a bit more power.

Going in my 34 GTR

6 boost Manifold, 50mm Progate & 6262 with .84

Haltech PS2000 ECU & IQ3 Logger dash to replace the MFD

New fuel system & some cams, cam gears and a few other bits and pieces.

Will post up a before & after run, looking forward to having a bit more power.

Capacity?

Comp ratio?

Cams?

Exhaust size?

Going in my 34 GTR

6 boost Manifold, 50mm Progate & 6262 with .84

Haltech PS2000 ECU & IQ3 Logger dash to replace the MFD

New fuel system & some cams, cam gears and a few other bits and pieces.

Will post up a before & after run, looking forward to having a bit more power.

Why the PS2000 and not the Platinum Pro plug-in?

Found this from Jan 25th 2013.

 

Car is 2001 Audi A4 1.8T

 

New 6262 CEA 620rhp @ 42psi (red)

Old  6262         520rhp @ 35psi (blue)

5857                420rhp @ 28psi (green)

Err, no? The different colours are hp, torque and boost, it's just a new 6262 versus and old 5857 in that comparison.

Capacity?

Comp ratio?

Cams?

Exhaust size?

Capacity: 2.6L

Comp ratio: Standard

Cams: HKS step 1's 272 8.7 lift (I think)

Exhaust: 4" dump into custom 3.5" exhaust with no mufflers

Will be tuned on E85 from the drum, the car is not my daily anymore and for $2,50/L I don't have to worry about watching the fuel prices jump up and down.

Why the PS2000 and not the Platinum Pro plug-in?

Because I'm not sticking with RB26 and don't wanna upgrade ECU's again.

Will utilize some of the additional channels from the PS2000 in the future.

A couple of people have also asked why the Logger IQ3, it's for same reason. buying now to setup so I don't have to replace in the future.

My aim is just to have a bit more poke when I press the accelerator down, I'm not chasing a power figure nor am I looking for a world record.

  • 2 weeks later...

My r34 gtr came back from Micks Motorsport making 501AWKW 671AWHP on 28 psi on united e85 with a precision 6766 bb and on bp 98 it made 370AWKW 495AWHP 20 psi

the engine is currently a Nitto 2.7 stroker ,ported head a set of 270 deg cams, Precision 6766 and a Turbosmart hyper gate we will push for more soon, will put a graph up when I go to the workshop the motor was built buy Dahtone Racing

  • Like 1

So I have finally booked the GTR in to get the PT6262 fitted.

I will finally have my own results to post in here..

Not chasing a power figure, will be adding new Cams, Cam Gears, Fuel system & ECU

starting out on 20psi and see how it all goes.

im a bit surprised actually I thought this car was a pretty serious piece of top dollar machinery already. any reason you decided on the precision?

im a bit surprised actually I thought this car was a pretty serious piece of top dollar machinery already. any reason you decided on the precision?

Hmm

Nah, my car is factory stock still. Only mod is the Fat Pipes exhaust.

I went precision to be different, turns out plenty of others have gone down the same road since this thread is 87 pages now.

Got a roller bearing 6262 to go on a mates 25/30 and it doesn't seem to spin as freely by hand as the GT35's I've had in the past. It actually hardly spins at all when idling. Is this normal or is there an issue somewhere

i have only ever seen this on BIG turbos as the air is passing past the turbo but not enough to spin it. Was on a 2J. I am 100% certain this isnt the issue here tho.

Got a roller bearing 6262 to go on a mates 25/30 and it doesn't seem to spin as freely by hand as the GT35's I've had in the past. It actually hardly spins at all when idling. Is this normal or is there an issue somewhere

That's strange, can you show us a video?

JEM tuned a 33 GTR the other week.

RB26+6466+E85+35psi=604awkw.

So it was a 6466!? I saw the pic and figured it might have been a 6466 or 6766 but I got no response when I asked - I *love* 6466, they are clearly an awesome turbo. Any word on how it spools on the RB26? Should beg JEM for a dyno plot post, it would be very very interesting

So it was a 6466!? I saw the pic and figured it might have been a 6466 or 6766 but I got no response when I asked - I *love* 6466, they are clearly an awesome turbo. Any word on how it spools on the RB26? Should beg JEM for a dyno plot post, it would be very very interesting

:dry:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
    • Dort sounds above 3k rpm are dorty 🤣 I might krinkle black the alloy 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...