Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know it's the shittest pic in the world but this should give you an idea of 6262 power potential. We ran it up at just under 2 bar (1.96 I believe) and it went 710rwhp (530rwkw) and 776Nm.

Stock bottom end RB26 with 1.2mm head gasket and Grex 9.1mm cams

Posted Image

What an effort, that stock bottom end must be loving you for it....

This seems a lot more than I would expect out of a 6262, was this on a hub dyno? Impressive effort either way.

What an effort, that stock bottom end must be loving you for it....

This seems a lot more than I would expect out of a 6262, was this on a hub dyno? Impressive effort either way.

Its in line with what I would have expected on a hubber - if not still a little shy of potential. I'd expect a cranked up 6262 to be able to crack 500rwkw on a rolling road, too.

Its in line with what I would have expected on a hubber - if not still a little shy of potential. I'd expect a cranked up 6262 to be able to crack 500rwkw on a rolling road, too.

That was just a single run, tuner actually wanted to go harder and felt there was still more left in it but standard head bolts didn't want to play ball. Have replaced with ARP2000 studs this morning.

It trapped at 135mph with around 640hp on the same dyno so would expect around 140mph now

Given that I've seen 491kW out of a plain jane GT35 on an SR and backed up with 147mph in a full weight 180SX, I would expect a 6262 to push over 500rwkW. I don't know how much over 500 it would do, but I guess the 6262SP was the one that put Precision on the map with a couple of EVO's that were trapping over 150mph and one into the 8's, that was enough to suck me right in back in 2008! :)

By the way I have a 6466 sitting here unopened in the box with a .84 T4 divided housing, it's been sitting here while I contemplated testing one on my own car but I'm going to pursue with what I have for now. PM me if interested.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...