Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 23/04/2015 at 10:41 PM, Hattori Hanzo 69 said:

that one is defs a 2.8, asking for ya boi vims see if there is a graph for a 6870 on a 26

Think it made over 800rwhp for about 3000rpm which is just silly!

Not sure on a 2.6L, it would shit out power but be fairly laggy. Doesn't vims want a track car?

  On 24/04/2015 at 12:40 AM, SimonR32 said:

Think it made over 800rwhp for about 3000rpm which is just silly!

Not sure on a 2.6L, it would shit out power but be fairly laggy.

Id agree with that, some good results happening on 3.0L and 3.2 stroker kits with the 6870 from what im seeing around.

Could be OK for a 2.6 if a small enough rear housing is selected, but it would be a issue up top end when at song. (depending on how hard you pushed it)

  On 26/04/2015 at 3:40 AM, SiR_RB said:

Very very nice mate must come on song strong !

6466 is still my fav turbo, seen results range from 500- to over 600kw

No need for dirty big 6870's and 7175's etc

Haven't got it back yet. Imagine it would push towards 600 with another 3-5psi like other results I've seen.

Definitely a good choice for E85.

Do you have a dyno graph or 38psi 2nismo?

I saw a dyno result of a 6870 on a 2.6 today with cams, low 30ish boost, make mid 500'sKw, was as laggy as hell, not very impressed, looked like a slug to drive on the street, nothing then all.

Seen a few like this so far on 2.6's, seems like the 6870 is more towards the extra 15% capacity that a 3.0L or stroker delivers.

Looks like 2.6's run a larger area under the curve on the 6466....

  On 27/04/2015 at 3:16 PM, GTRPSI said:

Do you have a dyno graph or 38psi 2nismo?

I saw a dyno result of a 6870 on a 2.6 today with cams, low 30ish boost, make mid 500'sKw, was as laggy as hell, not very impressed, looked like a slug to drive on the street, nothing then all.

Seen a few like this so far on 2.6's, seems like the 6870 is more towards the extra 15% capacity that a 3.0L or stroker delivers.

Looks like 2.6's run a larger area under the curve on the 6466....

It's a 1100hp turbo on a 2.6L, it was never going to be responsive. I would say my 6262 is right in the sweet spot for a 2.6L non drag application but it's rated at 705hp.

6466 would be a good all rounder for a 2.8L and a 6870 isn't too bad from what I have seen but more towards a drag power band.

  On 28/04/2015 at 12:44 AM, SimonR32 said:

It's a 1100hp turbo on a 2.6L, it was never going to be responsive. I would say my 6262 is right in the sweet spot for a 2.6L non drag application but it's rated at 705hp.

6466 would be a good all rounder for a 2.8L and a 6870 isn't too bad from what I have seen but more towards a drag power band.

I completely agree, 6262 or BW EFR 8374 is the biggest I would go on a real streetcar, up to 3.0L. I wonder how far off the compressor maps the 2.6 is with some of these giants? And I guess I will keep wondering because Precision doesn't need no stinkin' compressor maps!

Edited by HarrisRacing
  On 27/04/2015 at 3:16 PM, GTRPSI said:

Do you have a dyno graph or 38psi 2nismo?

I saw a dyno result of a 6870 on a 2.6 today with cams, low 30ish boost, make mid 500'sKw, was as laggy as hell, not very impressed, looked like a slug to drive on the street, nothing then all.

Seen a few like this so far on 2.6's, seems like the 6870 is more towards the extra 15% capacity that a 3.0L or stroker delivers.

Looks like 2.6's run a larger area under the curve on the 6466....

No point until it has enough injector. Then you'll see the whole thing. Ethanol and a torque converter fill the hole that might otherwise be there with a petrol/manual.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meh, At 60 years old, I have been doing dumb stuff for much longer than you mate, I am the true King And unfortunately I cannot be a maroon, as I am not brownish red As for not getting ITB's, the plenum intake will apparently show typical gains across the board and increase induction noise a bit, but, have all over less dort than ITB's Cost difference for the extra ITB dorts was significant though, the total parts for the plenum set up is "around" $2kAUD plus shipping, the ITB's were $4kAUD plus shipping, I was contemplating really hard about paying the extra $2k for all of the dorts, but weirdly, some form of common sense, from listening to the platform experts prevailed  As for the NA mod hate by some, I've had a few boosted cars, with all their inherent issues, I'm now looking at simplicity and legalities for a street car, maybe I'm just getting old, and I'm quite happy to spend some of the kids inheritance, 5kw at a time 馃ぃ And think of all the money I'll be saving on consumables that something with boost needs, like engines, gearboxes, diffs, clutches,  tilt trays... etc. etc. etc. 馃お
    • Haha.  I wouldn't say I am either but I've definitely been around it plenty.  I'm guessing you know the dial in is basically to make a handicap to level the playing field between racers.  The car with the slower dial in goes first and in theory if they run their dial in time and the faster car also does then they cross the finish time if they also have exactly the same reaction time - if you go faster than the dial in them you lose, but if you are too slow there's a good chance the other person will get to the finish line first. I'm normally supporting other cars but they were all pretty dialled and were egging me on to race as well, here's one of the cars I tune (Starlet) which ran within like 1 hundredth of its dial in through the competition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inEBu-d9Gn4&t=69s
    • Where ever the fuel reg gets it reference is what I use to T into for map reference been a very long time so where it goes to plenum/runners I have no idea but never had issues. 
    • What ecu? Same shop every time? Same ambient temperature? If timing is correct then pull plugs and see if lean or rich. Dyno can also read different if they have changed ramp rate or not set tacho/speed properly  
    • I've never done dial in's just straight up, whatever that's called. I'm far from a drag (racing ) expert.
  • Create New...