Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Seen the overlays as 6262 with give me a extra 1k rpm boost response and I'll be sticking in. Otomoto v cam for even more.

should do the job at the track at 15 psi and will also allow me a "street" high boost for when I go get a coffee on Saturday once a week

  • Like 1

Yea whats the go with the 6062.. any figures yet?

Is it the newest version of the 6262 basically?

Have not seen a result yet, but the 6062 is rated at 750 hp and the 6262 is rated at 705 hp.

What that translates into real works figures, who knows, but it's definately interesting. Smaller front fan but can flow more... Win win!!!!

Finally got the car with new Plazmaman intake manifold and 6870 to the track with an auto though...

9.60@140mph on 21psi

9.39 @ 144mph on 23psi

Turned it up to 40psi and the box doesn't want to play enough to head back to the track but it feels very strong. Hopefully back to the track in a month on 50psi.

Edited by PJ.
  • Like 2

Hmmm ok. I have driven a supra here locally with a gt3582r with a 0.63 rear and with the 3L and makes 350rwkw on 16psi. Granted it's a different motor, but it doesn't seem to choke it at all and response is insane.

I can't find any results on the 6062 gen 2 yet. Anyone got anything interesting?

For those who haven't seen it yet. The 6062 is rated for 750HP where the 6262 and 6266 is 705 and 735HP respectively.

Smaller turbos that flow more are always a good thing however these things need to be confirmed in a real world comparison! Just in case they've added more weight to the comp wheel which will affect spool up

All I could find with MR google was a 1.8L VW guy who did a boost vs RPM log and got 20psi by 4900RPM untuned.

Am I missing something?

Also is this the first release of a new line of Gen2 Turbos? It would be awesome to see this new design move it's way up to larger turbos for better spool vs Power.

double post:

Just saw the Gen2 6266 and 6466 are listed too. oops

800 and 900HP respectively

6266 Gen1 735HP

6266 Gen2 800HP

I'd love to see side by side dyno results

Im also keen to see results of Gen2 6062 and Gen2 6266 units..

Ive found 6466 vs. Gen2 6466 on a US Supra forum and it was identical spool, but with +30hp around the peak 1500rpm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It was roughly 3.5 hours.    car went in around 11:00 and I was done around 2:30 He did the initial runs, install the BC and then Nistune install and tune.  The best part was sitting in the lobby and hearing the skyline on full throttle at the dyno 😂😂
    • Glad it all went smooth. How long did the tuning process take?
    • Yeah that was kind of the same feedback my tuner gave me.  the boost tee is until I can sort out my plan for the electronic boost controller and what I’d get, where I’d mount the dash etc.  I’m happy with this until I can figure it out. Not a big fan of the A-pillar gauges. I’d like to get a clean install of the boost gauge - something digital like GFB.  Something like that might fit neatly where the ashtray is and look clean. I feel like replacing the OEM triple gauge is a bit extreme for a weekender like my skyline. And it’s not making crazy power to need all the additional sensors/gauges. 
    • I'm about to swap my box to Tremec T56 Magnum F & initially thinking of re-using my DCS twin plate (can get it re centred for the bigger spline) but it's been called out the box will be noisy (rattle) as the clutch is unsprung.  So I'm doing as much research as possible. I'm not so worried about holding the power as I'll go the track version which on paper will hold the maybe 1000hp I make. It's the longevity I worry about. DCS told me they don't use a sprung centre as it's just something that can break. The uni clutch has a very complicated sprung centre. Any one had or heard about any issues with it failing? Thanks in advance.
    • Auto is at least 10% (from my real, actual experience with different torque converters and manual on the same setup) ~185rwkw at 11.6psi (peak!) is entirely what one would expect without a FMIC or anything else on the intake, it does bleed off towards the higher RPM so it's what, 9psi there? Note: There is nothing that can be done about this with a manual boost tee. If you want to hold it steady and gain more top end, well - You will need electronic boost control.....
×
×
  • Create New...