Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I run a 6266 .84 T4 split pulse and made 352rwkw on 21psi that was with E70. Full boost about 4800. Though my Turbo is the Journal bearing one. If you buy BB alot more responsive around 4300rpm. 6266 is good size for 500kw with e85

Big difference between 600 or 700hp? I understand this came for a good price but obviously you aren't happy with it and the car has been built around this turbo now (exhaust cooler pipes etc) if 600 and a bit is your goal and you like response go a 6266 with a 1.0 rear. Your motor will love the larger turbine it will feel nicer down low off boost and it will make 600-650hp quite easily!

Are you on stock capacity? If so a .84 wont be too bad. But obviously you are gunna be leaning pretty hard on a stock motor chasing those numbers.

If your motor goes bang would you stay 2.6 or would you go stroker? If yes to stroker go the 1.0 if happy with 2.6 go .84

Edited by Mick_o
  • Like 1

Big difference between 600 or 700hp? I understand this came for a good price but obviously you aren't happy with it and the car has been built around this turbo now (exhaust cooler pipes etc) if 600 and a bit is your goal and you like response go a 6266 with a 1.0 rear. Your motor will love the larger turbine it will feel nicer down low off boost and it will make 600-650hp quite easily!

Are you on stock capacity? If so a .84 wont be too bad. But obviously you are gunna be leaning pretty hard on a stock motor chasing those numbers.

If your motor goes bang would you stay 2.6 or would you go stroker? If yes to stroker go the 1.0 if happy with 2.6 go .84

i already had a 3.5" tomei exhaust on the car, 3" dump no cat, cooler, pipe work all came with the turbo. sweet im just chasing info at the mo as ive read this thread a few times over since i put this turbo on. yeah shes still a 2.6 if she goes ill be looking at going 2.7 or 2.8. i know she'll get leaned on abit on a stock motor to make those numbers but she is my daily driven car and the occasional track/drag day. for the time been 600 would be the most but once built 700 will be my goal

Edited by cliptonz1

Hey mate, i saw you were selling your turbo on facebook and was going to comme t but didnt want to f**k up your sale.. 20psi @ 5000rpm does not sound right

I use a 6466 Gen2 with .82 Vband single entry housing on my built RB26, which has a Nissan 2.6 crank and HKS 272 10.2mm cams

On E85, it makes 30psi by about 4500rpm, and makes 710rwhp

I would highly recommend this to anyone.. it has less lag than my previous 2860-5 setup, which i personally did not think was laggy.. but theres no contest when compared to a big single, it comes on like an absolute motherf**ker

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
34 minutes ago, ohno1 said:

I reckon 1.00 will be too large on a 2.6

Read my mini review of my setup a couple posts up

Cheers mate. 

I was reading the thread for about half an hour. Must of missed the last page..

I have a 1.0 on a 6766 that's bolted to a 2.6 and its fine. E85, 272/264 9.1mm cams and a decent amount of head work and I don't think its laggy at all. I would see full boost (currently 23psi) no later than 4500rpm

  • 1 month later...

Ive decided to go with the gen 2 6266 with a t3 .82 rear on my basic built 25 (cams,springs,studs and forged).. I already had a manifold otherwise i would have liked to go the .82 T4 twinscroll.. but none the less ill be pushing it and hoping to post some decent results in the coming months.. the decision between the 62mm and the 64mm was tough but i decided to go with a slightly more street friendly turbo as after RW17 it will be mainly used around town... 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

So many posts to go through and not enough time :(

So what are people making nowadays with a 6766, 1.0 split rear on E85 on a stock stroke RB26?

My girlfriend seems to think her car is a bit of a nugget and I want to prove her wrong. It runs 138mph in full street trim and makes 485rwkw at 23psi on the Unigoup dyno which is a pretty tough dyno from my experience

Not sure about 6766 but my brother Inlaw, who bought my previous Gtr went 6466 1.00 and maxed the turbo out on his setup at 553kw at 40psi

built 2.6, mild head/cams, 3.5" exhaust etc on United e85 tuned @ Jez . 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Hi, I am currently still two Td05 g18 billet turbos. I would also like to switch to a singel Precision Turbo.  

My Setup:

 Build Rb26,

ported Head,

Oversize Valve, 

270cams 10.8 mm,

Revlimit: 8500,

1000cc Fic Injectors,

Walbro 450l Fuelpump.

Fuel: 102 oktan, 

Boost max 30psi

I want to more than 800hp on the Flywheel. 

I do not know which turbo I should buy. The 6466 bb or the 6766 bb? And if what ar? I apologize for my bad english :)

Edited by Ersatzreifen

Well. On a near stock head with a quick home port job, stock valves with 80lb springs and a set of drop ins i made near enough to 550awkw on a 2.8 with a 6466 with 84 rear. 4 inch dump was at 49psi. The turbos like to be run hard. 

 

Grab it by the pussy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean I can be OCD'y but this is really over the top. At that point why not just run a full wideband fuel controller? Especially if you run 3 widebands. The system works pretty well, which is trimming low load stuff to be within a few percent of the base map. Pre-engine _change_ the base map was only 1-2% off, depending on ambient temp, elevation, etc. Under load the LS is really very straightforward to tune, enough that a wideband closed loop would be overkill. If I really cared (and I hope I don't) I can always just go back to the MAF system the car actually came with. Which does all those nice calculations for me (temp, altitude, etc), now that you can buy 102mm MAF's that do not cause restrictions.
    • Good afternoon Team , just a quick update on performance mods  Current Mods list (Installed) HKS - Power Editor (Came with the car) looks to be some kind of boost controller RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Cat Back  RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Front Pipe AMS  - INFINITI Q50/Q60 RED ALPHA COLD AIR INTAKE KIT AMS  - Performance Heat Exchanger Intercooler Not Yet AMS Alpha Performance Full Race Down Pipes  - to be installed in May 
    • I'd be installing 2x widebands and using the NB simulation outputs to the ECU.
    • Nah, it's different across different engines and as the years went on. R32 era RB20, and hence also RB26, the TPS SWITCH is the idle command. The variable resistor is only for the TCU, as you say. On R33 era RB25 and onwards (but probably not RB26, as they still used the same basic ECU from the R32 era), the idle command is a voltage output of close to 0.45V from the variable resistor.
    • It's actually one of the worst bits of Nissan nomenclature (also compounded by wiring diagrams when the TCU is incorporated in ECU, or, ECU has a passthru to a standalone TCU).... the gripe ~ they call it the TPS, but with an A/T it's actually a combined unit ...TPS (throttle position switch) + TPS (throttle position sensor).... ..by the looks of it (and considering car is A/T) you have this unit... https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/2262002u11 The connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit, is the TPS (throttle position sensor) ...only the TCU reads this. The connector on the unit body, is the TPS (throttle position switch) ...ECU reads this. It has 3 possible values -- throttle closed (idle control contact), open (both contacts open, ECU controls engine...'run' mode), and WOT (full throttle contact closed, ECU changes mapping). When the throttle is closed (idle control contact), this activates what the patent describes as the 'anti stall system' ~ this has the ECU keep the engine at idling speed, regardless of additional load/variances (alternator load mostly, along with engine temp), and drives the IACV solenoid with PWM signal to adjust the idle air admittance to do this. This is actually a specific ECCS software mode, that only gets utilized when the idle control contact is closed. When you rotate the TPS unit as shown, you're opening the idle control contact, which puts ECCS into 'run' mode (no idle control), which obviously is a non-sequitur without the engine started/running ; if the buzzing is coming from the IACV solenoid, then likely ECCS is freaking out, and trying to raise engine rpm 'any way it can'...so it's likely pulling the valve wide open....this is prolly what's going on there. The signal from the connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit (for the TCU), should be around 0.4volts with the throttle closed (idle position) ~ although this does effect low throttle shift points if set wrong, the primary purpose here is to tell TCU engine is at idle (no throttle demand), and in response lower the A/T line pressure ... this is often described as how much 'creep' you get with shifter in D at idle. The way the TPS unit is setup (physically), ensures the idle control contact closes with a high margin on the TPSensor signal wire, so you can rotate the unit on the adjustment slots, to achieve 0.4v whilst knowing the idle control contact is definitely closed. The IACV solenoid is powered by battery voltage via a fuse, and ground switched (PWM) by the ECU. When I check them, I typically remove the harness plug, feed the solenoid battery voltage and switch it to ground via a 5watt bulb test probe ; thing should click wide open, and idle rpm should increase... ...that said though, if it starts & idles with the TPS unit disconnected, and it still stalls when it gets up to operating temperature, it won't be the IACV because it's unused, which would infer something else is winking out...  
×
×
  • Create New...