Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, ido09s said:

fark me, 49psi!!!!! what fuel?

I am hoping to make 550rwkw at 30 odd psi with a 6766. I currently make 485rwkw at 23psi and the car runs 138mph all day long which is the true dyno ;)

Is that on a 2.6? 

  • Like 1
9 hours ago, ido09s said:

fark me, 49psi!!!!! what fuel?

I am hoping to make 550rwkw at 30 odd psi with a 6766. I currently make 485rwkw at 23psi and the car runs 138mph all day long which is the true dyno ;)

Which ar?T4 ? 

Had my car on the dyno yesterday.. 570hp on 20psi,

Built 25 with the gen 2 6266 t3 .82

Currently the car is blowing alittle smoke on idle (typical precision?) so i wanna get that sorted aswell as a cas syncing issue before turning it up alittle more... 

Other then that im stoked with how it drives and comes on

IMG_7808.JPG

Edited by azzada1
  • 1 month later...
12 hours ago, acr said:

Do you think it will be possible to make around 700kw from a 6870 - h cover 1.15 rear on at rb28. Head has been ported and built? Trying to keep under 40psi. 

No one else has weighed in so I'll bite :)  Those turbos have been proven to make that power and more @ wheels on the "right dyno".   I personally wouldn't expect that kind of number on a Mainline or a Dyno Dynamics, but a Dynojet or Dynapack I'd say is plausible IF the engine spec and all supporting mods are up to it.    

E85 would be a must, btw.

Edited by Lithium

From my vague memory I've seen one do 700kw on a Dyno Dynamics fairly easily, may have been just under but not much (I was replacing my gearbox at the time so was a little distracted). That was a 2.8L and from memory around a 1.0 rear

12 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

From my vague memory I've seen one do 700kw on a Dyno Dynamics fairly easily, may have been just under but not much (I was replacing my gearbox at the time so was a little distracted). That was a 2.8L and from memory around a 1.0 rear

Sweet, that's good to know - I'm always cautious setting expectations on those dynos, people have gone >1000whp on other more popular breeds of dyno but its hard to know how to convert.

I reckon you will make it, but you'll need around 40psi these turbos love boost. I'm using 6870 1.0 rear just made 488hp on 15psi 98 pump fuel. Nothing to serious as it's just a run in tune my motor is only 2.7 and not built for 98 pump. Also it was on a mainline dyno 4wd

Edited by QUP29
  • 4 weeks later...
On ‎15‎/‎12‎/‎2016 at 2:41 PM, azzada1 said:

Had my car on the dyno yesterday.. 570hp on 20psi,

Built 25 with the gen 2 6266 t3 .82

Currently the car is blowing alittle smoke on idle (typical precision?) so i wanna get that sorted aswell as a cas syncing issue before turning it up alittle more... 

Other then that im stoked with how it drives and comes on

IMG_7808.JPG

Ok after getting frustrated with the smoke on idle and struggling to believe it was the brand new turbo with an inline oil filter I pulled the motor down and came across afew problems from when it was first assembled.. oil rings weren't to flash, acl pistons had hit and snapped off 5 of 6 oil squirters and we also found some glass beads in the head... frustrating but at least we found the real issues and tbh the motor was cheaper then the turbo..

My Reason for this post was to clarify that the smoke was not in fact the turbo, However if I hadn't had the inline filter I fear the turbo may have been damaged and needed a rebuild, the filter caught about 5 small pieces of glass and sand.. For the $80 it costs for the earls filter it seems almost stupid not to run it as insurance.

The motor has been rebuilt now and I've ordered a ross trigger kit to eliminate the CAS issues, I look forward to turning it up to see what the 6266 can do on 25-30psi on the rb25.

  • 2 months later...

If anyone is chasing a new 7685 (waiting list at most places), I've got a brand new (test-fitted only) 7685 gen 2, dual ball-bearing, 1.12 ceramic coated exhaust housing. Should crack 1000whp with correct supporting mods.

Chasing $4800 (RRP is around $5500) or swap for a 6870 gen 2 (prefer 1.15 twinscroll rear) with cash my way.

PM me if interested.

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It was roughly 3.5 hours.    car went in around 11:00 and I was done around 2:30 He did the initial runs, install the BC and then Nistune install and tune.  The best part was sitting in the lobby and hearing the skyline on full throttle at the dyno 😂😂
    • Glad it all went smooth. How long did the tuning process take?
    • Yeah that was kind of the same feedback my tuner gave me.  the boost tee is until I can sort out my plan for the electronic boost controller and what I’d get, where I’d mount the dash etc.  I’m happy with this until I can figure it out. Not a big fan of the A-pillar gauges. I’d like to get a clean install of the boost gauge - something digital like GFB.  Something like that might fit neatly where the ashtray is and look clean. I feel like replacing the OEM triple gauge is a bit extreme for a weekender like my skyline. And it’s not making crazy power to need all the additional sensors/gauges. 
    • I'm about to swap my box to Tremec T56 Magnum F & initially thinking of re-using my DCS twin plate (can get it re centred for the bigger spline) but it's been called out the box will be noisy (rattle) as the clutch is unsprung.  So I'm doing as much research as possible. I'm not so worried about holding the power as I'll go the track version which on paper will hold the maybe 1000hp I make. It's the longevity I worry about. DCS told me they don't use a sprung centre as it's just something that can break. The uni clutch has a very complicated sprung centre. Any one had or heard about any issues with it failing? Thanks in advance.
    • Auto is at least 10% (from my real, actual experience with different torque converters and manual on the same setup) ~185rwkw at 11.6psi (peak!) is entirely what one would expect without a FMIC or anything else on the intake, it does bleed off towards the higher RPM so it's what, 9psi there? Note: There is nothing that can be done about this with a manual boost tee. If you want to hold it steady and gain more top end, well - You will need electronic boost control.....
×
×
  • Create New...