Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know it's the shittest pic in the world but this should give you an idea of 6262 power potential. We ran it up at just under 2 bar (1.96 I believe) and it went 710rwhp (530rwkw) and 776Nm.

Stock bottom end RB26 with 1.2mm head gasket and Grex 9.1mm cams

Posted Image

What an effort, that stock bottom end must be loving you for it....

This seems a lot more than I would expect out of a 6262, was this on a hub dyno? Impressive effort either way.

What an effort, that stock bottom end must be loving you for it....

This seems a lot more than I would expect out of a 6262, was this on a hub dyno? Impressive effort either way.

Its in line with what I would have expected on a hubber - if not still a little shy of potential. I'd expect a cranked up 6262 to be able to crack 500rwkw on a rolling road, too.

Its in line with what I would have expected on a hubber - if not still a little shy of potential. I'd expect a cranked up 6262 to be able to crack 500rwkw on a rolling road, too.

That was just a single run, tuner actually wanted to go harder and felt there was still more left in it but standard head bolts didn't want to play ball. Have replaced with ARP2000 studs this morning.

It trapped at 135mph with around 640hp on the same dyno so would expect around 140mph now

Given that I've seen 491kW out of a plain jane GT35 on an SR and backed up with 147mph in a full weight 180SX, I would expect a 6262 to push over 500rwkW. I don't know how much over 500 it would do, but I guess the 6262SP was the one that put Precision on the map with a couple of EVO's that were trapping over 150mph and one into the 8's, that was enough to suck me right in back in 2008! :)

By the way I have a 6466 sitting here unopened in the box with a .84 T4 divided housing, it's been sitting here while I contemplated testing one on my own car but I'm going to pursue with what I have for now. PM me if interested.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...