Jump to content
SAU Community

Precision Billet Turbos


Recommended Posts

Comparing to a set of 2530.. is the 6262 BB laggier !? BTW. please educate me.. whats the difference between 6262 and 6266 ?[/quote

Good question!

Is the 6262 less laggy than a pair of 2530's ? 2530's on a 2.6 is respectable set up for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I remember, 6266 .84 divided rear with stock head forged bottom end, stock compression 26psi @ 135km/h (dunno what rpm)

T517z 10cm stock head and bottom end 23psi @ 150km/h (big HPI 3" dumps/ custom twin 3" to 3.5" front pipes/ custom 3.5" catback)

Both on caltex Eflex

Going back 25th of this month now with greddy camshafts and id2000's to see what happens, gonna work the cam gears for maximum response and midrange

Jez over laid his old setup with n1 turbos and his current 6262 and they both came on pretty much the same...could be posted in the 400kw thread

On the street my 6266 feels very nice, very happy with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How early man? It's a lot of turbo to have breathing that heavy, that early, on a 2.6. I can't picture your result here and now but I know its impressive. Remind me when it's making that sort of boost (1 bar).

1 bar on 3rd gear at 3750rpm with stock nur spec rb26 engine...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The only turbo of the range relevant to most people here that I am aware of is the 62mm CEA wheels - they are funnily enough the same OD, but seem like they may be a bit "deeper" (ie, distance from inducer diameter to exducer diameter along the shaft - not from centre). There seems to be a negligible amount more lag, and about 5% more flow at higher boost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That car rules, so much. It makes me very very happy - reminds me of old HPI videos of HKS street meets :)

Thats low 8s trap speeds, on radials - in a road legal car. Happy thoughts, indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only turbo of the range relevant to most people here that I am aware of is the 62mm CEA wheels - they are funnily enough the same OD, but seem like they may be a bit "deeper" (ie, distance from inducer diameter to exducer diameter along the shaft - not from centre). There seems to be a negligible amount more lag, and about 5% more flow at higher boost.

Thats what i was asking about i'm gathering that applies to the 6266

The 6262 and the 6266 got some changes

The 6266 now claiming 800hp

What was changed on the 6262 same thing or?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • With my pre/power I use a remote trigger cable(3.5mm jack each end). I turn tv on, it turns both on via ARC. Or, just the pre with the remote or its streaming software, turns on both. Not that difficult at all. Obviously,  you would also want to actually update/upgrade over other factors in your life(bills, family, other hobbies, etc)
    • Yeah, nightfall was very "meh". And I'm crap at pvp, so feels like everyone has cheats(it's just my lack of skill). Final shape has been pretty good. New raid and dungeon are pretty good. If you want to give it a go, probably wait until it's on sale. But, as usual, most of it feels very familiar. 
    • This morning was Kingswood's Microscopic Wars. It is the album's 10 year anniversary this year and we went to see them play the whole album as a special show a couple of months back. Was pretty spectacular.
    • Yeah I would like to try and get a ADM car to reduce issues with insurance. I've decided if I end up getting this car I will set it up to be a sleeper build, leave it looking stock/dad spec on the outside I wonder if you can just drop in the 400r/Red/Z ECU or better still use a flashing tool to copy the map off one. Backup the factory map and then flash the 400hp cars onto the 300hp cars ECU?
    • Nah, yeah, nah. Speakers have a nominal impedance of 8 ohm that looks more like 6.4 ohm when measured. The receiver's amplifiers (all channels) are all rated to 6 ohm (I think, it's been a long time since I cared). The real problem is that many modern class D amps have aggressive protection circuitry that cuts off the fun if they think too much current is being drawn. And with my speakers having series crossovers, as opposed to more typical parallel crossovers, and big TL enclosures, they can certainly dip down to lower impedances at some frequencies and that easily triggers the protection. Pioneer receivers are somewhat famous for it, but even Denon, Onkyo, et al, all have many complaints against them across various models. It only does it when listening to music at high levels. You have to be putting your ears at risk to do it. But sometimes I want to do that. If I was serious about using it as a listening room I'd simply upgrade the amp for the front pair to a nice Rotel or something, and just use the receiver for signal handling and processing - although that would be a bit of a pain in the arse too. Have to switch on more shit, pre-amp volume vs main amp volume, etc etc.
×
×
  • Create New...