Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you looking for a 3076R equivalent then go the 0.63/ 5558 which is what I did from research and Unigroup's advice, if you looking for bigger, then consider the 6XXX series...

I spent a heap of time comparing numbers on this also.

For memory when I looked at this (I dont have the numbers on me) the 6262/6266 are pretty much similar to a GT3540 and the Precision 6466 is somewhere between a GT3540 and a TO4Z# .

Obviously how these would drive will also vary based on the rear housing size/ split pulse or not etc.

All the T3/T4 ones are, AFAIK.

If you got one of their garret copy items it would have a water cooled core (IE the T28/GT30 variant stuff).

I always assumed bb chra had oil and water cooling.

I guess no one has had many issues with it though.

What did you guys do with the water lines? Just link the feed to the return with a braided line or something?

Tune all done, ran out of pump (fuel) top end so we stopped there but I'm fairly happy with how it went... May chuck another pump in and see how it goes but I'm happy for now :)

PTE 6262 on stock bottom end RB26 with a Greddy 1.2mm head gasket and Greddy drop in cams

20130113_143508.jpg

Edited by SimonR32

Tune all done, ran out of pump (fuel) top end so we stopped there but I'm fairly happy with how it went... May chuck another pump in and see how it goes but I'm happy for now :)

PTE 6262 on stock bottom end RB26 with a Greddy 1.2mm head gasket and Greddy drop in cams

20130113_143508.jpg

Wow why u making so much power man- 450ish rwkw is it?? How much boost and no E85?

600hp at wheels? Very nice result gotta be extremely happy with that !!

Is that on caltex eflex ?

Sucrogen, we don't get E85 on pump over here :(

Wow why u making so much power man- 450ish rwkw is it?? How much boost and no E85?

About 450kw at the hubs yeah, boost is on the graph 1.6bar to beef up the mid range and 1.4 bar top end. It's running E85

Awesome results mate. Hurry up and go to the drags :)

I considered cams :)

Hows it feel on the road?

Maybe, depends if I can be stuffed. Cams should make a bit more power, if you do cams I'll do another pump :)

Only drove it about it 200m, gave it stick in 1st and 2nd, held on... Was good!

What rear housing is on the 6262?

T4 0.84 divided

Very nice power! Looks a bit laggier than a Gt3582r, which isn't really that bad news on a turbo that will make as much power as this if you tried pushing it :-)

We overlayed a few GT3582R graphs and they were similar response. Remember hub dyno makes things look lazier than a roller graph and the run was only started at 3000rpm so not much time to wind up the big girl. Could make big power with another pump though, would go close to 700 if we were crazy haha

The boost isn't falling over top end either, it's just we layed more boost into the mid range to beef up the torque. If we had held that boost through it would have run out of fuel (and probably make another 30-40hp)

We overlayed a few GT3582R graphs and they were similar response. Remember hub dyno makes things look lazier than a roller graph and the run was only started at 3000rpm so not much time to wind up the big girl. Could make big power with another pump though, would go close to 700 if we were crazy haha

The boost isn't falling over top end either, it's just we layed more boost into the mid range to beef up the torque. If we had held that boost through it would have run out of fuel (and probably make another 30-40hp)

sorry if ive missed it, wondering if that a stock bottem end?

We overlayed a few GT3582R graphs and they were similar response. Remember hub dyno makes things look lazier than a roller graph and the run was only started at 3000rpm so not much time to wind up the big girl. Could make big power with another pump though, would go close to 700 if we were crazy haha

The boost isn't falling over top end either, it's just we layed more boost into the mid range to beef up the torque. If we had held that boost through it would have run out of fuel (and probably make another 30-40hp)

Yeah it's pretty clear it has plenty more flow in it - no question of that, for the lag it'll make way more than a GT3582R. I am most familiar with hub dynos, and the .82a/r T3 single scroll GT3582Rs tend to be all on by around 4300-4500rpm so barely any more lag considering the extra power but I'd have guessed it to be noticeable.

Yeah it's pretty clear it has plenty more flow in it - no question of that, for the lag it'll make way more than a GT3582R. I am most familiar with hub dynos, and the .82a/r T3 single scroll GT3582Rs tend to be all on by around 4300-4500rpm so barely any more lag considering the extra power but I'd have guessed it to be noticeable.

Compared with the T88 it's noticeable haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
    • Is MAF load really that bad? I'm not trying to do big power, my only real desire is VCAM and flex fuel support so I'm not terrified of blowing my engine apart from CA's appalling 95 RON "premium" fuel. Stuff like playing with closed loop boost control and really dialing in my transient fueling and ignition are frankly just to prove to myself I remembered something from uni.
    • Thats what ive been doing. Ive got a million questions but i know theyve probably all been answered before at some stage. Todays research included nismo heritage seat covers, s3 projector headlight retrofits and how to remove/paint the rocker covers 
×
×
  • Create New...