Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Depends if he is running E85 or not, my 6262 went 450kw on a hubber running E85 with baby cams. When it was making that power top end it was only running 19psi.

I'm sure on 98 you should go close to 400rwkw on 20-22psi with a 6262

Got a new fuel pump (Magnafuel) that arrived today... Getting it all ready tonight and hopefully back on the dyno tomorrow.

See how it goes on 1.6bar throughout the rev range, hell if I get cheeky might go 2bar and go for 500kw :)

Got a new fuel pump (Magnafuel) that arrived today... Getting it all ready tonight and hopefully back on the dyno tomorrow.

See how it goes on 1.6bar throughout the rev range, hell if I get cheeky might go 2bar and go for 500kw :)

Do it. You won't do it. :P

myengines back in the car, 6266 is bolted on and custom oil/return lines made

just waiting to finish the dump and intercooler pipe then its turn key, wont be atleast afew weeks till its tuned to post results (on e85)

simon R32 keen as to see your results mate, whats the flow difference between the walbro e85 and ur new pump?

myengines back in the car, 6266 is bolted on and custom oil/return lines made

just waiting to finish the dump and intercooler pipe then its turn key, wont be atleast afew weeks till its tuned to post results (on e85)

simon R32 keen as to see your results mate, whats the flow difference between the walbro e85 and ur new pump?

Walbro 355L/hr at 70psi and the Magnafuel Protuner 625 402L/hr

Walbro is so much better... Smaller, lighter, quieter and cheaper but can't be used externally so I had to look at other options.

Fired up the Magnafuel tonight, it's pretty loud (would be louder than a pair of 044s) but it should do the business

Did you replace the Walbro due to outright flow or lack of stability in pressure...or other reason ?

I had a Walbro in the Green car, was perfect. The GTR had a surge tank and Bosch 044, it ran out of flow so I needed to go either twin 044's or a big single pump, hense the Magnafuel getting the tick.

Hey guys, Nearly D Day for my GTR to jump on the rollers With the 6766 CEA & e85. Be Interesting to see what Jez can do with the beast Dont think hes tuned something this big as yet Maybe, except for the T88 Top Secret GTR.

I bet Alot of you guys are wondering what the 6766 can do on a Built RB26, Well I havent seen what they can do as yet anyways. shes got big cams in her so will be interesting 280 11.5mm Lift Just hope the engine likes the boost that these turbos produce.

Twin scroll ryan 4inch inlet & 3inch out from memory. Has 3.5 inch exhaust but not that thats going to matter its coming straight out of gate so should sound the goods lol.

What comp ratio is the engine? Any tricky headwork?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
    • Is MAF load really that bad? I'm not trying to do big power, my only real desire is VCAM and flex fuel support so I'm not terrified of blowing my engine apart from CA's appalling 95 RON "premium" fuel. Stuff like playing with closed loop boost control and really dialing in my transient fueling and ignition are frankly just to prove to myself I remembered something from uni.
    • Thats what ive been doing. Ive got a million questions but i know theyve probably all been answered before at some stage. Todays research included nismo heritage seat covers, s3 projector headlight retrofits and how to remove/paint the rocker covers 
×
×
  • Create New...