Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good ? on comp Ratio as it hasnt been tested since the built to be honest it has sat in the shed for 3 years with doing nothing. It comes out sometimes & getz fair up it down this road I know quite well. Head work ported Polished supertech vavles. It made 450KW with the HKS To4Z strapped to the side of it with race Fuel 23psi.

Twin scroll ryan 4inch inlet & 3inch out from memory. Has 3.5 inch exhaust but not that thats going to matter its coming straight out of gate so should sound the goods lol.

Cool can't wait to see your results trying to decide whether the 6766 is going to be too small for my new 3.2L thats in the build ATM ;)

1000 flywheel hp or as close as I can't get with good spool

What fuel? If on E85 then the Precision PT6466 seems to be the man for shooting in that area - basically every result I've seen for that turbo have been exceptional "for what it is". PT6766 CEA will do it and with a bit of change and a bit more lag, Forced Performance GT3794HTA is not a Precision turbo but I reckon from what I've seen makes me think they have a compressor map more suited to RBs (and 2JZs) - a little wider flow in the 30-40psi boost range (the Precisions definitely need more boost to make these power levels), and they sound awesome. A SLIGHT (ie 100 or so rpm) bit more lag than the two Precision turbos though.

Going on a roller (dyno dynamics) tomorrow... Ewwww :(

I'll try and get a run on current tune with same fueling to see roller vs hubber before we play with boost

Awesome :)

+1 actually, I've been treating the difference between these two as ~11% (so 600hp @ hubs = 534whp/399rwkw) so will be interesting to see how close this is.

There used to be a fairly well proven 7-8% difference between the hub dyno and a roller, we could repeat it every time.

The hub dyno we use has now been updated with new software and corrections (the 600hp run was done with this) and they are meant to read similar now.

Ahh cool, good to know - I had partly based that number off what SAU people insisted when comparing hub dynos and otherwise but have been starting to get suspicious after seeing trap speeds of cars run on DD being much closer to cars with similar Dynapack numbers (ie, my own) but had used that partly because of avoiding angsty Aussies complaining about inflated numbers :)

Keen to hear the results anyway, especially when you nudge the boost up!

Well that was a bit of a fail, there is an issue with the dyno and even with 4wd set to 50/50 torque split the thing was doing burnouts as soon as it came on boost...

Ended up going 560hp but started spinning at 550hp and pretty much flat lined from there. Would have been well over 600awhp on 24psi if it had traction :)

Edited by SimonR32

Well that was a bit of a fail, there is an issue with the dyno and even with 4wd set to 50/50 torque split the thing was doing burnouts as soon as it came on boost...

Ended up going 560hp but started spinning at 550hp and pretty much flat lined from there. Would have been well over 600awhp on 24psi if it had traction :)

put 20 fat kids in the back! dont comment until we have results!!! :P

this is still with the 6262 yeah simon?

put 20 fat kids in the back! dont comment until we have results!!! :P

this is still with the 6262 yeah simon?

No access to 20 fat kids so it'll have to do. The power was almost ramping vertically when it started spinning and then hovered around 550awhp from 5500-8500.

Yeah 6262 T4 divided 0.8 rear

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
    • Is MAF load really that bad? I'm not trying to do big power, my only real desire is VCAM and flex fuel support so I'm not terrified of blowing my engine apart from CA's appalling 95 RON "premium" fuel. Stuff like playing with closed loop boost control and really dialing in my transient fueling and ignition are frankly just to prove to myself I remembered something from uni.
    • Thats what ive been doing. Ive got a million questions but i know theyve probably all been answered before at some stage. Todays research included nismo heritage seat covers, s3 projector headlight retrofits and how to remove/paint the rocker covers 
×
×
  • Create New...