Jump to content
SAU Community

Precision Billet Turbos

R32GTR/Iceland
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

SimonR32
SimonR32

The 6262 sillyness is never ending... New cams just got the most power and torque it's ever made

SimonR32
SimonR32
Mick_o
Mick_o

Dale is 100% correct its a well proven fact that smaller cams in RB's aid in response. Even going from a stock cam to a type b pon cam will cost you response. Been many track guys that have thrown the

Posted Images

Lithium Grand Master

Lithium

Posted
Posted

For a single entry that is very impressive.

(looks at T51R) :ermm:

Yep I reckon the PT6466 CEA is Precision's best moment, it basically always seems to deliver - the better the setup, the crazier the result. Looking forward to Scr48's result... should drive very nicely on a 3litre and obviously the potential is there for massive power, even the .84 will make a lot but if it ends up not being enough then going to a 1.15 hotside would allow for unrestrained silliness :)

I'm not 100% sure yet, but one thing I am not sure of is if someone puts one on a high flowing RB (ie, RB30 with aggressive headwork and cams) if they will flow enough per psi to keep the big engine happy - they seem to be keen on high pressure ratios for their power, but that might just be the cars they've been on so far. Thats the only reservation I have at all, and it may not be justified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lithium Grand Master

Lithium

Posted
Posted

Man the precision turbos appear to be the best bang for the buck. I know EFR and VGT are newer but you can't deny living proof!

FP HTA are very real competition, the 6466 is a particularly good offering however - but from FP you have the "rest" of the awesome turbos. Some of the best value for money turbos I could think of for small/medium sized engines in order would be (some real rough and realistic E85 power ranges):

FP GT3076R HTA - For 330-380kw @ wheels

FP GT3582R HTA - For 370-450kw @ wheels

FP GT3586R HTA - For 430-500kw @ wheels

Precision PT6466 CEA - For 500-600kw @ wheels (basically it just seems to do so much so well!!)

FP Super 94 HTA - For 580-680kw @ wheels (same as above - but larger scale)

Those are my favourite considering price, reliability, fitment, spool and power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sandeep Community Regular

Sandeep

Posted
Posted

the 6466 is popular with the Supra fans so there are some results for 3.0L motors but results on the RB26 are pretty hard to find. The general consensus from what I read was don't bother with the 6766 as the 6466 is so damn good and punches above it's weight.

Our set up still has more in it, I've heard these turbos love 35psi+ so when we get it to hold spark we will go back on the dyno to see how it goes.

Yep I reckon the PT6466 CEA is Precision's best moment, it basically always seems to deliver - the better the setup, the crazier the result. Looking forward to Scr48's result... should drive very nicely on a 3litre and obviously the potential is there for massive power, even the .84 will make a lot but if it ends up not being enough then going to a 1.15 hotside would allow for unrestrained silliness :)

I'm not 100% sure yet, but one thing I am not sure of is if someone puts one on a high flowing RB (ie, RB30 with aggressive headwork and cams) if they will flow enough per psi to keep the big engine happy - they seem to be keen on high pressure ratios for their power, but that might just be the cars they've been on so far. Thats the only reservation I have at all, and it may not be justified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCR48 Grand Master

SCR48

Posted
Posted

Yep I reckon the PT6466 CEA is Precision's best moment, it basically always seems to deliver - the better the setup, the crazier the result. Looking forward to Scr48's result... should drive very nicely on a 3litre and obviously the potential is there for massive power, even the .84 will make a lot but if it ends up not being enough then going to a 1.15 hotside would allow for unrestrained silliness :)

You and me both! Hopefully Friday!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Noy Experienced

Noy

Posted
Posted

Capacity: 2.6L

Comp ratio: Standard

Cams: HKS step 1's 272 8.7 lift (I think)

Exhaust: 4" dump into custom 3.5" exhaust with no mufflers

Will be tuned on E85 from the drum, the car is not my daily anymore and for $2,50/L I don't have to worry about watching the fuel prices jump up and down.

Because I'm not sticking with RB26 and don't wanna upgrade ECU's again.

Will utilize some of the additional channels from the PS2000 in the future.

A couple of people have also asked why the Logger IQ3, it's for same reason. buying now to setup so I don't have to replace in the future.

My aim is just to have a bit more poke when I press the accelerator down, I'm not chasing a power figure nor am I looking for a world record.

So finally got around to getting my car sorted, only to run into more problems.

I ended up with a Platinum Pro BNR34 specific model, and 3.5" dump not a 4"

Everything else above was fitted and turns out should've updated the valve springs too, thinking the 272 drop in cams would be ok with stock valve springs.

After a problem with the CAS & Valve float when you add any boost the car will be getting some supertech springs & possibly a Ross trigger kit and heading back for more boost.

What I ended up with was 494hp @ 13.5psi

I'll post up the dyno sheet later tonight when I get home and take it out of the car.

Another upgrade I will look at will be updating the coils or fitting a CDI & pencil coil kit

The 6262 sounds great, spools hard but I can't wait to get some boost into it.

The goal is still 20psi, I have no real power figure aim but judging on what it made @ 13.5psi its gonna go close to or over 600hp quite easily.

I'll keep everyone posted,

Cheers

Noy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Piggaz Grand Master

Piggaz

Posted
Posted

Paul, I hope you are going to plot this for reference :)

I've done a quick eye plot ;)

I'd love to drive it. Dyno only tells half the story.

Errr and I sold those exact turbo which I was gonna put on my own car :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • luke gtr
      Calling all audiophiles

      By luke gtr · Posted

      With my pre/power I use a remote trigger cable(3.5mm jack each end). I turn tv on, it turns both on via ARC. Or, just the pre with the remote or its streaming software, turns on both. Not that difficult at all. Obviously,  you would also want to actually update/upgrade over other factors in your life(bills, family, other hobbies, etc)
    • luke gtr
      Destiny 2

      By luke gtr · Posted

      Yeah, nightfall was very "meh". And I'm crap at pvp, so feels like everyone has cheats(it's just my lack of skill). Final shape has been pretty good. New raid and dungeon are pretty good. If you want to give it a go, probably wait until it's on sale. But, as usual, most of it feels very familiar. 
    • GTSBoy
      What Music Are You Listening To?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      This morning was Kingswood's Microscopic Wars. It is the album's 10 year anniversary this year and we went to see them play the whole album as a special show a couple of months back. Was pretty spectacular.
    • 180 wanabe
      Thinking of getting a Q50 300hp and just tuning it instead of getting the Q50 Red or 400R

      By 180 wanabe · Posted

      Yeah I would like to try and get a ADM car to reduce issues with insurance. I've decided if I end up getting this car I will set it up to be a sleeper build, leave it looking stock/dad spec on the outside I wonder if you can just drop in the 400r/Red/Z ECU or better still use a flashing tool to copy the map off one. Backup the factory map and then flash the 400hp cars onto the 300hp cars ECU?
    • GTSBoy
      Calling all audiophiles

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, yeah, nah. Speakers have a nominal impedance of 8 ohm that looks more like 6.4 ohm when measured. The receiver's amplifiers (all channels) are all rated to 6 ohm (I think, it's been a long time since I cared). The real problem is that many modern class D amps have aggressive protection circuitry that cuts off the fun if they think too much current is being drawn. And with my speakers having series crossovers, as opposed to more typical parallel crossovers, and big TL enclosures, they can certainly dip down to lower impedances at some frequencies and that easily triggers the protection. Pioneer receivers are somewhat famous for it, but even Denon, Onkyo, et al, all have many complaints against them across various models. It only does it when listening to music at high levels. You have to be putting your ears at risk to do it. But sometimes I want to do that. If I was serious about using it as a listening room I'd simply upgrade the amp for the front pair to a nice Rotel or something, and just use the receiver for signal handling and processing - although that would be a bit of a pain in the arse too. Have to switch on more shit, pre-amp volume vs main amp volume, etc etc.
×
×
  • Create New...