Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

nice, but did you have a bra on the front of that wagon? spose in tumut it can be useful

i was crossing the road to my car (32 4dr type m with a bit of a wing) as i was parked outside bi lo or what ever the old IGA is these days in wynyard st.

the old woolpack looks a little different since doug cameron got hold of it...

i saw alot of VL Communists with p-plates

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31363-spec-of-skylines/#findComment-649190
Share on other sites

Yeah, car bra for stones and insect crud.

Sorry didn't see you, must've been lookin' elsewhere.....or something.

Yeah Woolpack is no longer a retirement home for old age pensioners, its been 'modernised.

Common whores are the car of choice around here, I'm the only lonely skyline for a 100 kilometre radius. Even if it is only a gts-t it's still special around here.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31363-spec-of-skylines/#findComment-652483
Share on other sites

Not to ignore you sewid, but I just got back to the office (I go away with work a bit), and find I've been given a new computer. Now all my really cool stuff is on my old drive, so I'll have to link 'em up and bring all my 'private' stuff across. I'll get to it some time next week.

I'm away again most of the week............

Also need to take some good qual pics of the cedric, since I bought the digi camera (thanks sly100) on the forum here, I can do that now [take pics that is].

But I gotta say that its really only a gts-t with a few mods.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31363-spec-of-skylines/#findComment-652585
Share on other sites

It could be, I'm not skyline educated enough to be able to tell you, I know it has had some serious work done on it, whether by Nissan, or Nismo, or the Jap dude that owned it, I don't know. I do know:

Full lock diff

G Max Nismo clutch

Tein coil over height and ride adjustable

Super advan wheels 255/245 yokohama advan tyres

hks pod filter

blitz fmic

hks evc

blitz turbo timer

apexi turbo gauge

Greddy gauges x4 oil pressure, water temp, oil temp, exhaust temp

cusco rear wing

oil cooler

m/c brake stop bracket

3 1/2 exhuast hks viper 5" s/s muffler

cusco front top bar on suspension

MP3 player

300kph nismo speedo

different front bar

carbra

momo wheel

razo gearknob and accelerator pedal

project U brakes

And I'm told its, a bigger turbo [i haven't seen a std one, so looks no diff to me]

bigger injectors

aftermarket ECU, no markings that I could see, so don't know what sort

I also know it does 250kph with the a/c on [forgot to turn it off] an not flat, still accelerating [i have a witness to this], reckon it would be flat at 260/270kph, maybe my speedo is out of calibration, I don't know, I had it serviced and calibration checked by Olympic instruments in Pymble prior to installation, so wouldn't think so, but wheel diameter etc may change the ratio. This was at 16 psi boost, which apparently it has been built to take [or so I'm told] etc etc [i normally run at 0.75/1.2 kg/m on the evc.

i've had it dyno'd twice now, and its making about 195rwkw [189 and 197 at two seperate places, ie not the same garage].

I take all the pride of ownership etc, but take NO credit for all this, I didn't do anything. I've only owned it since May 2003.

Hope this didn't bore you too much, i hate this sort of thing a bit.

I'll get some pics out soon.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31363-spec-of-skylines/#findComment-652689
Share on other sites

it may just be a gtst but its a 40th anniversary 98 isnt it? which means it should be quite different to the rest of the GTS25t cars out there. I wouldnt mind a look under the bonnet :P

Under the bonnet......................

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31363-spec-of-skylines/#findComment-656118
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...