Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hp @ 6200RPM

350Z = 287hp , 214 KW

g35 = 280hp , 208.8 KW

torque @ 4800RPM

350z = 371.5 NM

g35 = 366 NM

wheelbase

350Z = 2650mm

G35 = 2850mm

overall length

350z = 4315mm

g35 = 4628mm

overall width

350z = 1815mm

g35 = 1816mm

Overall height

350z = 1320mm

g35 = 1392mm

coefficient of drag

350Z = ?

g35 = .29 (.28 with aero)

seating configuration

350Z = 2 seats

g35 = 2+2

curb weight

350z = man 1463kg, auto 1468kg

g35 = 1549kg

weight distribution

350z = 53/47

g35 = 52/48

fuel tank

350z = 76 L

g35 = 75.71 L

head room

350z = ?

g35 = front 995.7mm, rear 881.4mm

leg room

350z = ?

g35 = front 1113mm

shoulder room

350z = ?

g35 = front 1361mm

City L per km

350z = ?

g35 = ?

Im not sure if all these numbers are correct

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31373-g35-versus-350z/#findComment-633352
Share on other sites

from a Japanese site, and translated using babblefish:

350Z Fairlady Z version ST

Standard-vehicle itself price (Tokyo area) 360 ten thousand Yen drive system FR car names type UA-Z33 transmission 6MT size weight fixed capacity door several total length x full x total height 4310 x 1815 x 1315 mm interior long x interior width x interior high 1000 x 1475 x 1100 mm wheel based 2650 mm roadspace 120 mm vehicle weight 1450 kg riding in a car fixed capacity 2 name door several 3 standard color black/橙/the red/blue/pearl option color diamond silver/the sparkling silver/premium liquid silver engine type there is a DOHC V type 6 cylinder LEV and the type VQ35DE turbo is not total cubic displacement 3498 cc use fuel unleaded premium gasolines Fuel tank capacity 80 L efficiency highest outputs 280 ps (205.94 kw)/6200 rpm largest torques 37 kg m (362.85 N m)/4800 rpm power weight ratio 5.18 kg/ps fuel consumption rate (10/15 mode travelling) 9.7 km/L minimum turning radius 5.4 m power transmissions running gear tire ago after 245/45R18 225/45R18 91W 96W? Brake system (before) ventilated disk type brake system (after) ventilated disk type suspension (before) multi-link type suspension (after) multi-link system

Sorry for the poor english! :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31373-g35-versus-350z/#findComment-633418
Share on other sites

And the V35 350 GT premium:

Standard-vehicle itself price (Tokyo area) 356 ten thousand Yen drive system FR car names type UA-CPV35 transmission 6MT size weight fixed capacity door several total length x full x total height 4640 x 1815 x 1395 mm interior long x interior width x interior high 2025 x 1455 x 1135 mm wheel based 2850 mm roadspace 125 mm vehicle weight 1530 kg riding in a car fixed capacity 4 name door several 2 standard color black/the silver/pearl option color burning lead-lead/crystal blue engine type there is a DOHC V type 6 cylinder LEV and the type VQ35DE turbo is not total cubic displacement 3498 cc use fuel unleaded premium gasoline fuel tank capacity 80 L efficiency highest outputs 280 ps (205.94 kw)/6200 rpm largest torques 37 kg m (362.85 N m)/4800 rpm power weight ratio 5.46 kg/ps fuel consumption rate (10/15 mode travelling) 9.3 km/L minimum turning radius 5.7 m power transmissions running gear tire ago after 245/45R18 225/45R18 91W 96W? Brake system (before) ventilated disk type brake system (after) ventilated disk type suspension (before) independent suspension multi-link type suspension (after) independent suspension multi-link system

They're both cool! :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31373-g35-versus-350z/#findComment-633423
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...