Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Question about exhausts... I know bigger is better when it comes to turbos....

Lets say i'm running 1.5BAR boost on N1s... making about 350AWKW.

Looking at getting a new exaust n try n keep the noise down in the process.. I'm wondering if i should be going 3.5 from the dump pipes... inch or 3 inch from the cat.

I could be mistaken but I think the stock dump pipes are 2.5inch diameter?

Which would mean there's...

2.5 r=1.25 areax1=4.91 area x2=9.817477042

9.8in^2 area... (seems a bit big but thats what the maths say pi * r ^2 *2 ...)

Now into a single 3 inch ...

3

r=1.5

area=7.07in^2

or 3.5 inch..

3.5

r=1.75

area=9.62in^2

On that alone it would seem that anything less than 3.5 inches is going to be rather restrictive...

However, anyone got any thoughts on changes between 3.5 and 3" setups in terms of noise and power around 300-400 kw?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313840-exhaust-question-3-or-35/
Share on other sites

Im no gtr expert so im not sure what size the stock dump size is. My opinion is anything over 300rwkw and you should have a 3.5" exhaust. If you look through the rb26 dyno thread 90% of the gtrs over 300rwkw have 3.5" exhausts.

2.25 or 2.5" dumbs, to a merge that is 3.5"

That is what you want.

My "rule" of thumb is this

3" upto 300rwkw

3.5" upto 350rwkw

4"+ 400rwkw+

Im running 3.5", 91dB, will flow 340rwkw without much of a problem.

2.25 or 2.5" dumbs, to a merge that is 3.5"

That is what you want.

My "rule" of thumb is this

3" upto 300rwkw

3.5" upto 350rwkw

4"+ 400rwkw+

Im running 3.5", 91dB, will flow 340rwkw without much of a problem.

^^ What Ash said.

:O

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From the pictures I have when doing the job the flywheel is the same diameter, I don't think they're playing weird tricks like putting weights at the outer diameter to increase flywheel inertia or anything like that. The OEM flywheel is definitely heavier, but it's not a huge difference. Quoted weight savings of the clutch is 2 kg so I can't imagine the flywheel being lighter than ~7 kg. Kind of regret not weighing it before the clutch went into the car but as far as driveability goes I have no complaints.
    • HKS trigger kit should be very easy to integrate with a Link. It's a 36-2 crank trigger. Hard part is finding the motivation to take off the timing belt and everything on the front of the engine to install it. You also need to cut out a hole in the oil pump housing so the sensor can read the trigger wheel. Changing out the cam sensor for a 24 tooth setup is probably good enough but as others have mentioned depending on what underlying assumptions are changed it becomes more of a problem. Reading the crank state off of the cam is an abstraction that works in the general case, but if you have an edge case it makes less and less sense. There is a GTX2860 gen 2 that can take a compact 5 bolt housing so it's direct bolt on but I'm not 100% sure of what's involved. Peak compressor efficiency drops off a bit on these turbos vs -5s, 77% vs 73% but you get way, way wider region of operation. The -5s have a really strange surge line in their compressor map that is all over the place. If you think the hot side on the -5s aren't open enough you can try the Tomei T550B turbos which a local tuner seems to be happy with:
    • i need a complete tail light for my R33 GTR if you have please let me know.
    • I need a great maintenance workshop around Idaho, if you know one please let me know..
    • Hello friends, i have a good friend in Canada that looking for a good condition 1993 GTR around him please if one or know someone around you that is willing to let it go please let me know so that i can inform him.....Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...