Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I have been looking at lots of different turbos that would work well on my RB25. So I had a few minutes spare at work and thought I would put them on a chart to do a comparison. Let me stress this is very approximate, I only took 7 different rpm readings and rounded off the power figures to at least 5kw. Its just more to get an idea of the different shapes etc.

- 3071R dyno sheet was obtained from the Nistune Forum, in particular Matts own one

- 3076R dyno sheet was obtained from the RB25 dyno results thread on this forum

- Hiflow was off Hypergears website

- PU Hiflow was also off Hypergears website

- Std Turbo is my own dyno sheet

Some of the inconsistencies:

- boost level, generally it is around 17psi dropping off to around 15psi (except for the std turbo which is only 10psi).

- speed vs rpm seemed to vary between the dyno sheets, could be the different model cars having different diff gears.

So please take it for what it is.

post-29432-1269923514_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/314283-quick-turbo-comparison-on-rb25/
Share on other sites

  75coupe said:
so how about seeing the HKS 2835 ProS or the HKS 3037 on there... :thumbsup:

how many power curves can you fit on there before it becomes hard to read.

they are out of my budget so guess I hadnt even been thinking about them. will see if i get some more "spare" time at work hehe

Can you also start @ 2000rpm? :P

Fussy i know, but a fair bit of driving is between 2000-3000rpm for a lot of people, IMO it's an area that can be important.

Larger turbo you have, more of a "hole" you have before 3000rpm meaning around town the car tends to feel lazy.

Which result of 3071 did you use? Perhaps try one of the ones from this forum?

The 3071 seems to be a bit slower than i'd expect...

I'll have a chat to Paul and Christian and see if we can't get our own version going - one similar to anti-lag's where you can remove graphs and add them in at will.

Will take someone to manually plot them i think, but once initial work is done could prove quite handy overall.

sau.garagespank.com dyno thingy was the old tool we used

RPM = (SPEED / 28) * 1000

this assumes 4th gear with 4.11 diff gears

so for BNR34 it should be dynoed in 5th gear, HR32,ECR33, BCNR33 all 4th gear

oh cool I made the right choice with the 2835 then with the earlier power range, which is what Im after.... I cant wait...

but geez the 3076 really does have some mid range doesnt it... oh well...

thanks btw..

Great idea Harvey. I am freaking out about my turbo selection now, I went and bought a 3071R (real spec) in 0.63A/R, but I keep being told that I should have gone with a 2871R instead for chasing a responsive 250-260kw? Is there any way to add a 2871R (HKS GT-RS) to the chart, just for comparison? And maybe show the exhaust A/R to legend?

Thanks mate!

  R31Nismoid said:
Can you also start @ 2000rpm? >_<

Fussy i know, but a fair bit of driving is between 2000-3000rpm for a lot of people, IMO it's an area that can be important.

Larger turbo you have, more of a "hole" you have before 3000rpm meaning around town the car tends to feel lazy.

Which result of 3071 did you use? Perhaps try one of the ones from this forum?

The 3071 seems to be a bit slower than i'd expect...

I'll have a chat to Paul and Christian and see if we can't get our own version going - one similar to anti-lag's where you can remove graphs and add them in at will.

Will take someone to manually plot them i think, but once initial work is done could prove quite handy overall.

Yup will try and get some 2000rpm readings.

I got the 3071R chart from here:

http://forum.nistune.com/viewtopic.php?f=2...fa&start=15

Its really hard to compare apples with apples as I mentioned with different boost levels and other differing setups.

I reckon the really surprising result is the PU High Flow offered from Hypergear!

All turbos (except standard and std hi flow) have a 0.82 equivalent size exhaust housing. Im a mid range top end person so thats what I naturally focussed on. In my opinion you want to make sure a turbo makes power all the way to redline, no point having a such a nice revvy engine like the rb and then a restrictive turbo. Yes there are plenty of turbos that can still have some nice low down as well which is the ideal of course. If low down torque is your number 1 preference then why buy an rb25, plenty of other larger capacity engines with more low down torque. I agree though its about the overall package.

Yeah would be great to get a more detailed one going. I have always found it hard to look at different dynos and compare them.

Edited by Harey
  chrisR34GTT said:
Great idea Harvey. I am freaking out about my turbo selection now, I went and bought a 3071R (real spec) in 0.63A/R, but I keep being told that I should have gone with a 2871R instead for chasing a responsive 250-260kw? Is there any way to add a 2871R (HKS GT-RS) to the chart, just for comparison? And maybe show the exhaust A/R to legend?

Thanks mate!

I think you have chosen well with the 3071R. I think a 2871R is too small for an rb25. I would actually choose the 0.82 housing with the 3071R but thats just me. I think the 3071R has the nicest curve (excluding the hks turbos) on that chart.

Do you know what A/R Matt has on his 3071? From what I have read boost control seems inevitable with the 0.63, but I just don't know what the lag would be like for the 0.82. However, if confirmed that Matt has 0.82 then I will gladly swap over as the 3071 curve follows a similiar progression to his stock turbo setup.

  Harey said:
Yup will try and get some 2000rpm readings.

I got the 3071R chart from here:

http://forum.nistune.com/viewtopic.php?f=2...fa&start=15

Its really hard to compare apples with apples as I mentioned with different boost levels and other differing setups.

I reckon the really surprising result is the PU High Flow offered from Hypergear!

All turbos (except standard and std hi flow) have a 0.82 equivalent size exhaust housing. Im a mid range top end person so thats what I naturally focussed on. In my opinion you want to make sure a turbo makes power all the way to redline, no point having a such a nice revvy engine like the rb and then a restrictive turbo. Yes there are plenty of turbos that can still have some nice low down as well which is the ideal of course. If low down torque is your number 1 preference then why buy an rb25, plenty of other larger capacity engines with more low down torque. I agree though its about the overall package.

Yeah would be great to get a more detailed one going. I have always found it hard to look at different dynos and compare them.

Didn't see that.

Well in the name of ressearch, to compare apples with apples, is there anyone out there with a reasonably priced genuine 0.82 exhaust housing that they could sell me? I could do dyno runs with both setups (3071R 0.63 & 3071R 0.82) at the same boost levels and post them up. Anyone interested to see that?

  chrisR34GTT said:
Didn't see that.

Well in the name of ressearch, to compare apples with apples, is there anyone out there with a reasonably priced genuine 0.82 exhaust housing that they could sell me? I could do dyno runs with both setups (3071R 0.63 & 3071R 0.82) at the same boost levels and post them up. Anyone interested to see that?

Hells yes I am interested >_<

Fair effort for you though.

  75coupe said:
oh cool I made the right choice with the 2835 then with the earlier power range, which is what Im after.... I cant wait...

but geez the 3076 really does have some mid range doesnt it... oh well...

thanks btw..

Personally I the HKS 2835 is the choice off all those turbos. I would be very content if I were you.

Interesting........the 3076 obviously is not on the best combination of motor/mods otherwise is would continue to go up the chart rather than dip and turn over.

The 3037 is a really good progressive turbo, but has less midrange than I thought it should have, but as you say they are all 'snapshots' of one! Ohh to be able to have the time to take a sample of say 20 for each turbo and then plot the average. Never mind in a braod sense it is all relative.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
×
×
  • Create New...