Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sooo true. This is only one example from each turbo. I am not sure if the dyno I chose for the HKS 3037 is really doing it justice. Found it on page 25 of the rb25 dyno thread so if you have a better one let me know. I try and find stock engines and roughly 17psi tapering off to around 15.

Wow I'm impressed by the 2835. Very smooth curve, more than enough power for a street car and with basically standard response.

PU makes some impressive midrange power after reaching full boost but the trade off appears to be quite a bit of lag and fade off heading towards upper rpm. As long as you keep within that powerband it looks like a good performer.

As said it's not gospel - we don't know the extent of modification on the cars tested but other than that the general shapes of the curves appear to be pretty accurate.

Great idea Harvey. I am freaking out about my turbo selection now, I went and bought a 3071R (real spec) in 0.63A/R, but I keep being told that I should have gone with a 2871R instead for chasing a responsive 250-260kw? Is there any way to add a 2871R (HKS GT-RS) to the chart, just for comparison? And maybe show the exhaust A/R to legend?

Thanks mate!

I run the GT-RS... its a pretty good turbo! Makes 253rwkw on 14psi. Lots of other supporting work as well tho. Either way, I think you will be happy with the 3071R. I cant imagine it would be too different in its spool. The GT-RS offers crazy response for the street tho!

I run the GT-RS... its a pretty good turbo! Makes 253rwkw on 14psi. Lots of other supporting work as well tho. Either way, I think you will be happy with the 3071R. I cant imagine it would be too different in its spool. The GT-RS offers crazy response for the street tho!

Post up (or link) your dyno and I will add it in to the chart.

Post up (or link) your dyno and I will add it in to the chart.

Take your pic as to which one. without over laying them I think they are pretty close for two different dynos :cool:

Keep in mind this car has HKS cams which should increase midrange (plazmaman plenum, some head porting). For that reason its up to you whether you add it or not, considering you are looking more towards stock engine turbo upgrade comparisons? :P

post-41581-1270011897_thumb.jpg

post-41581-1270012502_thumb.jpg

Hey good idea.

I use Excel quite a bit - so i knocked up one of the ones Ash was talking about where you tick the box and it adds/removes the item,

Feel free to use this one if its easier & If it can be uploaded into SAU go for it - if not - don't worr about it :cool:

I know its not a common one but I'll post up my RB25 with HKS 2530 when I get the new Dyno sheet.

Cheers,

Disregard the numbers - they are all made up!

SAU_Turbo_Chart.xls

Ok HKS GTRS added

Interesting granthem your dyno finishes around 175kph or 6200rpm. What happens after that? Just flat?

Nope, thats my limiter! (thats actually my car reving to 7200rpm in 4th gear on both dyno runs). Dont ask me why, but its got short ass gearing. Maybe it has shorter diff gears then the standard 4.11s, or the actual gearbox has different gearing (I think it might have some straight cut gears, whines like a bitch)

Either way, thats all the way to limiter (7200rpm) in 4th on both runs. Something aint stock :P

What exhaust housing are you running Granthem?

Unknown dump, RSR 3.5 front and 3.5 from the cat back from memory. Still running a cat too, but its getting on now and is cracked and shitty. Still, pulling ok figures i guess

With the 2x PU highflowed curves tipping off this is due to the stock actuator been too soft. (didn't have high pressure actuators and wastegate controller back then). They are capable of making lot more power then that at full potential.

Also please try to map kwickr33's ATR43G4 dyno reading. I believe that is a very interesting read out.

Shame there isn't a dyno plot of the GT3076R showing its full strength in there - you see the slight compromise in low down over the GT2835, and not the top end roar.

Fwiw, GT3037 and GT3076R are exactly the same - so really you could just stipulate "GT3037/GT3076R - .xxa/r" as the a/r bit is going to be the only thing which changes the spool and top end flow.

Don Dada - btw, slightly OT threw the Skyline for a power run at a local car event just to test the cars behaviour and determine if its ready for tuning. The internal gate is still a little lazy compared to an external but far better than before, hits 1bar by 3600ishrpm then eases off its aggression in spool (wastegate easing open) to hit 17psi by just over 4000rpm - where it holds flat enough to redline that it could have been done with a pencil and a ruler.

Power figure inconsequential at this point, fat as hell fuelling at that boost level as its not been tuned to do anything other than not pop - hopefully will be sorted very shortly now I know its all good to go... then I might be able to add a revised IG GT30R result :D

With the 2x PU highflowed curves tipping off this is due to the stock actuator been too soft. (didn't have high pressure actuators and wastegate controller back then). They are capable of making lot more power then that at full potential.

Also please try to map kwickr33's ATR43G4 dyno reading. I believe that is a very interesting read out.

Well post up the revised PU high flow on a stock engine and show us.

I am hesitant to post up kwickr33s dyno as he has worked heads, therefore not being equal to the other dynos.

Shame there isn't a dyno plot of the GT3076R showing its full strength in there - you see the slight compromise in low down over the GT2835, and not the top end roar.

Post one up then. I just chose the first one I could find in the dyno thread that had a stock engine and looked like it was running well.

Edited by Harey

Ok now with Hypergear ATR3G4 and updated HKS GTRS. For both of these dynos they hit the rev limiter just after 170kph which earlier than what the other cars here are doing. I have modified the speed per rpm for these two and set 7000rpm = 170kph. They both seem to be have very low power down low which doesnt seem right. Dynosheets with rpm are much preferred. rpm per speed seems to vary quite a bit between cars ??

post-29432-1270084535_thumb.jpg

Hmmm yeh mine does look pretty poor down low. A comparable car to mine is PM-R33, and he has dyno graphs lying around here somewhere I think. It ended up with around 263rwkw on 20psi i think.

Still, I always thought my gearing was shorter, and now i know it is!

Hmmm yeh mine does look pretty poor down low. A comparable car to mine is PM-R33, and he has dyno graphs lying around here somewhere I think. It ended up with around 263rwkw on 20psi i think.

Still, I always thought my gearing was shorter, and now i know it is!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
×
×
  • Create New...