Jump to content
SAU Community

Written Off R30 Hatch


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Have become aware of a R30 hatch available for parts. Another car managed to park on top of it!!!! So it's been written off.

If you need parts, contact Janet Coleman on 03 9822 3361

how much for the dash with air con and gauge cluster surrounds and 2 inside door leaver surrounds ?

thanks, marc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't sell on eBay with a starting price of $500. Now re-listed with a starting price of $600. Unusual selling strategy!

JH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just a note if anyone's thinking of putting this car back on the road in Victoria.  

The car is a "repairable write off". To have it re-registered requires a roadworthy cert and a Vehicle Identity Validation (VIV) cert from VicRoads. The VIV costs an amazing $484!

This applies to all those hail-damaged cars as well. To get them registered and back on the road costs around $1200 (roadworthy cert + VIV + rego).  

Correction: 

The VIV cert would not be needed for this car, the requirement only applies to cars up to 15 years old. (The mistake was made by an inexperienced reporter me!)

Update:

No bids in the $600 starting price auction either.

JH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt a R30 with rego and perfectly running engin would even sell for $600 these days...

I got thrashed by an old lady in a box-like cressida today... fail

The box like Cressida was probably an MX73 2.8L DOHC 12V which has far more poke than your L24E.

I reckon my 3.0L Turbo Diesel Jackaroo would thrash your MR30.

D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The box like Cressida was probably an MX73 2.8L DOHC 12V which has far more poke than your L24E.

I reckon my 3.0L Turbo Diesel Jackaroo would thrash your MR30.

D

Yeah, i thought the cressida had more torque, as as the road got steeper she went quicker!

of course your jackaroo would eat a bog stock L24e with 52kW at the rears... for now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Final update:

Car sold to the scouts (for an undisclosed price). Sounds like its destined for mud racing/autocross.

Scouts didn't want the reupholstered seats so I've purchased them.

JH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Score!!!! do they want the headlight covers too???

The car's gone already (to Colac I think). I'm picking up the seats tomorrow, will ask about the scout group's contact details.

JH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...