Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, due to financial reasons we've decided to get rid of our mkiv supra.

We need to get rid of it to pay off the rest of the loan due to being very broke lol.

The car is almost completely unmolested except for 18"rims and stereo system

and is my girlfriends daily driver as she can't drive a manual :-).

Car:1993 Toyota Supra

Location:Sunnybank Hills, Brisbane

Colour:Black

Trans:Auto

Engine:2jz-ge (NA)

Km's:165,xxx

Other:

Positives:

Has a set of 18" rims with 2 rear tires needed due to an earlier camber problem. Have receipt if needed.

Fronts 225/45/18 rear 264/35/18. Also has a pioneer mp3 head unit and alpine type-r speakers

front and back. Only serviced 2000km ago.

Negatives:

I assume the o2 sensor is on its way out as the engine light comes on when slowing down but goes off

when you start accelerating again.

The drivers side power seat stopped moving forward but seat is as far back as it goes and is still easy for my gf to drive.

Has a foot long scrape on the passanger side rear quarter from the mirror on my civic when she reversed out and didn't

see it.

price: $15,000 ono

She paid just under $20K for it a 2 years ago at an importers in slacks creek.

The car drives perfectly and handles well due to the larger tires. Perfect for a p-plater to pass the time on and still be

driving a nice car. The car currently has my rx7's 18's on the back but will come with the pair to match the front.

Will be sold as is, with no rwc as we don't have the money to replace the tires etc. Car is registered till some time

during june and will be sold with rego still on it. Car is driven daily and can be inspected and test driven upon

request. Any other info needed? Just pm me.

Will try to get some pics before the weekend.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/315560-fs-mkiv-supra-na-auto/
Share on other sites

bump.

going panel beaters to get scratches and scrape removed next week and had the scan tool put on and it reads no fault codes. the mechanic said it may be faulty brake fluid level sensor as they are apparently a common problem.

bump.

have a set of bilstein coilovers going in next weekend and faulty brake fluid level sensor replaced. car will now also be sold with a rwc too.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...