Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not Working for me either. Is the original Vin plate thing still in the engine bay? If you get the number of the Japanese one, it should work ( Technically should be the same as the complianced one apart from the 69 xxx whatever...So i wonder why yours isn't coming up.) From what i could work out, it might be missing some numbers..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/315823-vin-no/#findComment-5170771
Share on other sites

The model designation is WC34 for all of them what's inbetween the W & C tells you the engine & drivetrain

G - RB25

H - RB20

N - 4WD

and judging by the number of digits, there is no N in yours.

if you give me the model number (the TGKN..... number on the Japanese ID plate we can search this way)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/315823-vin-no/#findComment-5171162
Share on other sites

The model designation is WC34 for all of them what's inbetween the W & C tells you the engine & drivetrain

G - RB25

H - RB20

N - 4WD

and judging by the number of digits, there is no N in yours.

if you give me the model number (the TGKN..... number on the Japanese ID plate we can search this way)

Ill get that in a day or so and will let you know.

I am interested caus some of the N/A RWD had the Neo??? engine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/315823-vin-no/#findComment-5171454
Share on other sites

I bought it today. Its a 25G. Looks exactly like my RSFour. Even the N/A grille.

just saw your other thread hugh, so i guess being a RWD it will be without the N in the VIN, the first one i posted was with the N in the vin. if your still interested in the vin check here it is.

post-34711-1270954101_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/315823-vin-no/#findComment-5174591
Share on other sites

just saw your other thread hugh, so i guess being a RWD it will be without the N in the VIN, the first one i posted was with the N in the vin. if your still interested in the vin check here it is.

post-34711-1270954101_thumb.jpg

Yep thats her.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/315823-vin-no/#findComment-5174604
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...