Jump to content
SAU Community

Operation Pipe Down - Vic Cops Vs Noisy Cars


ashneel
 Share

Recommended Posts

If imported cars were not clearly targeted for noise and epa tests this exercise would almost be pointless.There is more unsafe cars on the road than what most of us people on here drive.If we have a problem with our cars that we think is unsafe or needs fixing at least we try to have it fixed.Most of our cars have been tuned to have better fuel consumption using higher grades of petrol.

i would hate to see what a 1974 holden with lead replacement fuel uses

and the overall pollution it puts out with no cat and bad shockers drum breaks and every thing worn out not including the extra oil it burns or the old dodge truck that jack uses to take his sheep to the farm.leaving black smoke behind him for the last (MILE) Yes mile not kilometers

sooner or later our cars will not be a revenue raiser for the government and will be classed as a form of transport just like JACKS TRUCK ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"While it did not offer specific numbers, Victoria Police noted the Nissan Skyline range as the vehicle of choice for the majority of offenders."

In order to be an offender, you must be proven guilty. Unless the db get physically measured, this statement is incorrect.

It should read "Victoria Police is now targetting the Nissan Skyline range" :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"While it did not offer specific numbers, Victoria Police noted the Nissan Skyline range as the vehicle of choice for the majority of offenders."

In order to be an offender, you must be proven guilty. Unless the db get physically measured, this statement is incorrect.

It should read "Victoria Police is now targetting the Nissan Skyline range" :/

Maybe at the end of the day, even though they handed out loads of EPA's, maybe only 1/3 of the cars are actually over the limit lol, so that's why they don't want to state it, so it still looks successful lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If imported cars were not clearly targeted for noise and epa tests this exercise would almost be pointless.There is more unsafe cars on the road than what most of us people on here drive.If we have a problem with our cars that we think is unsafe or needs fixing at least we try to have it fixed.Most of our cars have been tuned to have better fuel consumption using higher grades of petrol.

i would hate to see what a 1974 holden with lead replacement fuel uses

and the overall pollution it puts out with no cat and bad shockers drum breaks and every thing worn out not including the extra oil it burns or the old dodge truck that jack uses to take his sheep to the farm.leaving black smoke behind him for the last (MILE) Yes mile not kilometers

sooner or later our cars will not be a revenue raiser for the government and will be classed as a form of transport just like JACKS TRUCK ...

Don't be silly, why would they target an innocent civilian like that? They want to chase down the real criminals, Skylines with sports exhausts who by association and stereotyping break road rules all the time. All of us desperate criminals interfering with the lives of other people. Spending our money on maintaining our cars instead of drugs. We really should form something of a vocal minority club based around this kind of shit - whichever government offers to give up the bullshit revenue raising tactics gets our vote. Because there are ALOT of car enthusiasts in Victoria. It would take alot of pride swallowing for some one eyed voters to be prepared for a swing vote though. Cause right now both major state government parties just seem to be trying to out do each other rather than differ on issues. Instead of "I won't do this" it's a case of "I'll do it twice as much as you can".

Noise pollution is the biggest crock of shit excuse. Fair enough a party next door with loud music going on for hours into the night, you can't escape that. But how long does it take for a car to drive by a house, 3 seconds at 50km/h? Can you even hear the exhaust from inside other cars when driving on the road? I imagine the people who have it worst are those who sit at a bus stop and have to listen to cars idle when traffic comes to a stop, for about a minute. And we all know how deafening an engine idle can be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

harley's do get pinned.... i was speaking to a noise tester the other day and he was saying that he used to get heaps of them in...

i'm all for bird's idea actually... if we organised to vote in a particular direction, 100,000 odd votes could actually get the government thinking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are people suprised that skylines rated so highly they are as common as a fkn holden/ford and are a lot louder.. coulda picked that as a no brainer they'd be up there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you'ze guys are soft if u go by with ya big cannon blasting people are gonna think the same of you today as they did 3 weeks ago really article doesnt change much.. not to mention how many people read that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the lawmakers are slaves to the media Alex...

That's why Skylines were/are targeted in the first place, because of every article that ever mentioned Skylines since the beginning of time. It's not a word of mouth thing, it's media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they havent been targetted since day dot.

like saying vn commo's were always bogan spec single spinner brakie machines.

its the sheer number of skylines on the roads that has caused this problem not the media. particularly 33's when you say skyline 90% of ppl would think 33 over a 32 or 34 as their are lower volume of them getting around

it amazes me how many skylines i see around every single day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite sure that this would attract an EPA...

:P

Anyway, I haven't been done (as far as I know), but I have seen a couple cars get pulled over - one was a WRX and another was a CRX with 20" exhaust :D If they are going after noisy shitboxes, that's great :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite sure that this would attract an EPA...
:P

Anyway, I haven't been done (as far as I know), but I have seen a couple cars get pulled over - one was a WRX and another was a CRX with 20" exhaust :merli: If they are going after noisy shitboxes, that's great :(

That sounded terrible..

that reminds me, i heard a gtr33 at idle at least 30m away.. and it was pretty loud.. but that was in a sheltered carpark at chadstone, so maybe the echos make it seem louder.

but that, i'm sure will definitely cop a defect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they havent been targetted since day dot.

like saying vn commo's were always bogan spec single spinner brakie machines.

its the sheer number of skylines on the roads that has caused this problem not the media. particularly 33's when you say skyline 90% of ppl would think 33 over a 32 or 34 as their are lower volume of them getting around

it amazes me how many skylines i see around every single day.

It goes:

Large number of Skylines > Media > Police

The reason I say media are largely responsible is because there have always been a large number of Skylines on the road for 10 years...yet the police and the lawmakers are getting worse and worse in their operations and laws because the media are getting worse in their reports. It was always bad for imports but its much worse than it was 10 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It goes:

Large number of Skylines > Media > Police

The reason I say media are largely responsible is because there have always been a large number of Skylines on the road for 10 years...yet the police and the lawmakers are getting worse and worse in their operations and laws because the media are getting worse in their reports. It was always bad for imports but its much worse than it was 10 years ago.

I've noticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its much much worse now... I just can't wait till the attention moves to the next "big" thing.

While we are flavour of the month I don't think there is too much we can do - as much as I would like o do something. All you can really do is not be stupid on the roads, even then thats not enough...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how's this. I get an EPA notice in the mail today...as reported by the cop who got me for my HID headlights earlier this month. He didn't even look at my exhaust system, or listen to it. So now I have to pay $75 to have someone test my car because a cop assumed my exhaust isn't legal and that my car doesn't meet emissions standards. And if my car fails that test, I have to pay $37 for a re-test. Am I supposed to just guess that my car meets the standards and bad luck if I have to re-test?

This place is f**ked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are a few variables here, some are relevant but not critical (IMHO) to help answer your question. The two major things: 1) Ignoring anything to do with forced induction - all engines have their own natural torque curve, and it will ALWAYS roll over higher in the rpm.  There is a fixed relationship between power and torque.  When dealing with kw and nm, the relationship between them is roughly: kw = (rpm * nm) / 9549 nm = (kw / rpm) * 9549 The peak torque of an engine (without boost) will typically climb until somewhere nearish the middle of it's operating rev range, give or take a bit - then start dropping again.   The nearer the minimum and maximum rpm of the engine the steeper that drop off tends to be. 2) Boost simply increases the density of the air going into the engine, which inflates the torque at that point.  The ramp up in the torque curve you see on a turbo engine is due to the boost rising, but it's essentially just multiplying the torque you'd see if it was naturally aspirated.  The roll over you see at the end will typically be what would have always happened with the engine, whether it was naturally aspirated or turbocharged.   If the torque never started dropping then power would climb infinitely. The cool thing about this is you absolutely can tune the power delivery to suit the needs of the owner and/or the limitations of the car, and I regularly do this.    With modern turbos we've got to the point where a setup that someone may run well over 20psi of boost with could actually reach target boost well under 4000rpm if the tuner/owner WANTED to - and a lot of people seem to do this when there is actually no realistic benefit, generally it just adds a massive amount of strain to the engine and drivetrain and often actually makes the car harder to drive. As a general rule I tend to tune the boost curves for cars I tune to reach a "useful" torque level through the rev range and will often end up with a curve that ramps hard to a point, then creeps for the rest of the rev range - not to make the boost curve "soft" as such, but more to make sure its neither laggy nor pointlessly violent in it's delivery.   There have been cars I've tuned to be almost like a centrifugal supercharger (or naturally-aspirated-ish) where they actually only hit like 8psi of boost before opening the gate, then ramp up the next 10psi over the rev range... if the car is "loose enough" to drive. On the flip side I've tuned a car that had stock cams and the engine's natural torque curve fell over HARD in the higher rpm and resulted in a slightly awkward power curve to work with, in that case I actually started ramping up boost to boost torque in a way to offset the engines "NA" torque drop off... at peak rpm actually running a good 5psi+ more boost that what the "flat curve" would have defined.  This gave the owner an extra 500rpm or so of useable rev range, and had a fairly solid impact on times he was running at motorsport events due to being able to hold gears a bit longer and also falling into a more useful part of the rev range in the following gears. Here's an example of an RB in a GTSt I've done the "softened" boost curve to not pointlessly ramp straight to the max boost target early in the rpm, but still made sure it builds useful boost.  If you went in the car you'd not guess at all that the boost curve was doing anything "weird", it feels like it spools immediately and accelerates relentlessly (traction dependent) and holds to max rpm.   I don't know if you'd guess what the boost curve was doing by driving the car, or even looking at the dyno plot... but imho it suits the combination.  
    • therefore on the first examples, as we see, changing cams (graph 2) influences the quantity of torque at high revs its OK for me. so a tuner can act on the wastegate via the boost controller to increase the boost at high revs? on the last example, the boost does not decrease ok, but the torque does. this can come from cams etc etc ok. but on the other curves the boost is not constant, it increases, this is what I find strange to my mind. even more so if it comes from the relief valve. sorry I'm very new don't blame me. in my mind I couldn't imagine how the boost could be higher after the spool  
    • right, but fundamentally, for a given mechanical setup, you are either using all the torque (and therefore power) it will give, or you are choosing to run it less efficiently. Many tuners will have a practice of identifying peak available torque and then winding it back a couple of % for safety, but unless you are working around a very specific issue like a weak gearbox, there is nothing to be gained by making 20 or 30% less than the engine can
    • You can manipulate the torque delivery by ramping in boost gently, then throwing it all in after peak torque to keep the torque flat. It's nothing magical.
    • Tuning the wastegate to do it. That is all. Most people want the boost to not fall off like the most recent example. Those also look like dyno runs with an Auto/Torque converter setup, which does fun things to the graph. The boost tapers down like that because the turbo cannot supply the same amount of air at 7000rpm that it can at 3000 in terms of PSI. That, or the tuner has decided that it tapering off like that is what someone chose to do. IF you have a wastegate that can't bleed enough air to slow the turbine, and IF that turbo can flow enough air to feed the engine at high RPM, you get 'boost creep' which is a rise of boost pressure beyond what you are capable of controlling and/or want. None of these show symptoms of that, but if you had a run that was 20psi at 3000rpm, and 27psi at 7000rpm, it could be an example of that. Or simply that the person wanted boost later for their own reasons... The dyno graphs don't always show the full context.
×
×
  • Create New...