Jump to content
SAU Community

Veilside Andrews V 17x9 And 17x10


Recommended Posts

im posting this up for a friend.

Item Summary: Veilside Andrews V 17x9 and 17x10 1500$ 4/5 stud

114.3 will suit most jdm cars

Location: QLD: Brisbane

Condition: Used

Reason for Selling: no use for them

Asking Price: 1500

Delivery Methods: PickUp

Contact Info: 0423 505 157

Extra Information:

Hey guys,

Have 17x9jj +35 and 17x10jj +27 Veilside Andrews V

4/5 studs pattern 114.3

federal tyres super steel 595

17x9 has 215/45 r 17 89-95% tread

17x10 has 225/45 r 17 camber wear on the treads

Minor gutter rash not really noticeable

Selling these as a set.

1500$ ono

Will NOT SEPARATE.

Im patient and will wait for the right price and owner

INSPECTION WELCOME (^^,)

Im located in South-East Brisbane

Contact me via 0423 505 157

David

Pics:

13042010076.jpg

10042010074.jpg

10042010075.jpg

SDC10049.jpg

SDC10050.jpg

SDC10053.jpg

SDC10052.jpg

SDC10054.jpg

SDC10055.jpg

SDC10057.jpg

SDC10062.jpg

SDC10063.jpg

12012010011.jpg

08012010006.jpg

SDC10681.jpg

09102009089.jpg

Picture of the wheels when its in actions.

10333_166622918091_596623091_370957.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTX2860R Gen 2 is an option. No, it doesn't actually do much. The basic problem with wanting 600 whp out of the factory twin turbo setup is a few things. One is that the twin turbo piping is just so, so inefficient. The front and rear turbos are not actually working evenly. The rear turbo is always moving more air than the front. On top of this the OEM rear compressor inlet is rubber that likes to collapse causing a huge intake restriction. The merge doesn't even wait until the intercooler to happen, and it happens at a 90 degree angle. This is why you see some discussion about "turbo shuffle", where in certain conditions one turbo can actually force air to go backwards into the other compressor and stall it out, then once the other turbo recovers it stalls out the first turbo in a cycle until you do something to break out of it. The other issue is that the RB26 is just not that efficient an engine. It needs a surprising amount of ignition timing to reach MBT for a given cylinder pressure so all that time in which the cylinder is pressurizing before TDC is just wasted energy. An N54 might be around 10 degrees BTDC on a stock turbo getting into the boost. An RB26 is closer to 25 BTDC. Net effect is a turbo roughly the size of what HKS uses on the GTIII-SS (smaller than the R3/GCG Japan "GT2860-1" -7s) is only good for maybe 550 crank hp or low 400 whp while a roughly comparable turbo on an N54 can deliver something like 700 crank hp and obviously drivetrain losses are greatly reduced when you aren't burning a bunch of power on keeping a hydraulic pump + transfer case preloaded all the time. So yes, you can make a lot of power but there's a reason why people go single turbo for the numbers you're asking about. Don't forget that the RB26 can't even do a straight line pull without oil starving on the stock oil pan either. Baffles can help, but really you just need more oil capacity.
    • Yeah sure, which messenger app is it?
    • would you like to be added to the messenger group?
    • Found some from 2009. The lobster bends were smoothed out on the inside with minimal gaps (perhaps 2mm) where the silicone joiners were used. 
    • And if you have to drive it in a civilised (or excessively woke) US state, find a way to register and insure it in a redneck state, so you can roll coal in it without worrying about legalities.
×
×
  • Create New...