Jump to content
SAU Community

Disc Rotor And Hat Dissassembly.


fungoolie
 Share

Recommended Posts

On the ongoing saga of why my front wheels clatter and click when turning and Nissan HPC in SA saying that is a problem they can't fix and to just to live with it. I'm starting to wonder if its the floating type brake rotors that's the root of the problem... If so why can't we disassemble the "Mclaren" style anti rattle pins securing the rotor to the hat? The manual says it's a non serviceable part and Nissan HPC reiterated that to me saying even they cannot disassemble them. They've cleaned the mating surface between the back of the hat and the hub and that fixed the problem for a week. I suspect that wasn't the actual source of the problem and just playing around with the bits concerned alleviated the problem for a week before it returned. Im starting to suspect that the "anti rattle" springs used to mount the rotor to hat aren't so anti-rattle and this may be where the problem stems from. Seems odd that they don't even recommend that if you disassemble the parts that you reassemble with new pins, springs etc and just re loctite them..... Has anyone pulled their rotors off their hats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the ongoing saga of why my front wheels clatter and click when turning and Nissan HPC in SA saying that is a problem they can't fix and to just to live with it. I'm starting to wonder if its the floating type brake rotors that's the root of the problem... If so why can't we disassemble the "Mclaren" style anti rattle pins securing the rotor to the hat? The manual says it's a non serviceable part and Nissan HPC reiterated that to me saying even they cannot disassemble them. They've cleaned the mating surface between the back of the hat and the hub and that fixed the problem for a week. I suspect that wasn't the actual source of the problem and just playing around with the bits concerned alleviated the problem for a week before it returned. Im starting to suspect that the "anti rattle" springs used to mount the rotor to hat aren't so anti-rattle and this may be where the problem stems from. Seems odd that they don't even recommend that if you disassemble the parts that you reassemble with new pins, springs etc and just re loctite them..... Has anyone pulled their rotors off their hats?

I've replaced r35 rotors a few times (onto stocker hats). I think it's fair to say the clicking noise isnt related. Just IMO. Sounds a bit fanciful to me.

Edited by LSX-438
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...