Jump to content
SAU Community

SAU Market Research  

108 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Seems you have rather accurately portrayed the curve of normal distribution here lol. Slight negative skew (as per the skinny car nerd factor), but other than that looking good :)

lol @ statistics jokes.

XS all the way (no homo)... i hate baggy shirts

quote related;

"i wear tight tops that make me look bigger, so all the chicks can admire my figure"

Nah, I am not in the T-Shirt business but I see quite a few live shows / bands play and they all seem to use Gildan T-Shirts and Hoodies for their merchandise.

Then they print their designs on it.

I find the quality very good.

A well all round universal T-Shirt and Hoodie for whatever you need.

What's 6.1oz shirts. Hoodies too.

6.1 Ounces?

That's good advice, thanks mate : )

I've tried some samples from various other t-shirt producers and ahve found the quality really poor.

Tight fitting necks, long sleeves, poor washability etc.

Given the research i've done, it appears that these are a winner, time will tell.

And yes, 6.1oz, is the 6.1 ounce - 205 gram shirt. Not the lightest shirt, but not the thickest, i can't wait until they come in.

I'm a US "American Apparel" size S... which is apparently a XS at Jay Jays, but a S at Dangerfield and an M at Cotton On.

AFAIK American Apparel's is accepted as a global standard size due to market proliferation.

That's good advice, thanks mate : )

I've tried some samples from various other t-shirt producers and ahve found the quality really poor.

Tight fitting necks, long sleeves, poor washability etc.

Given the research i've done, it appears that these are a winner, time will tell.

And yes, 6.1oz, is the 6.1 ounce - 205 gram shirt. Not the lightest shirt, but not the thickest, i can't wait until they come in.

Interesting...

So it is a 6.1oz thick T-Shirt...

:) learnt something new today.

Holy Crap!

60 people have voted thus far! That's incredible! Thank you so much guys.

Another 40 votes and I will have a perfect indication.

Keep them coming guys, thanks again!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Getting a decent signal from all 6 throats is a challenge. I don't know for sure, but I suspect that the stock balance tube is not ideal for it. I have done it on an ALFA 4 cylinder (about 35 years ago, so don't ask for too many details). We drilled 4x holes in the manifold runners, put in some fittings and ran hoses to a decent sized (I think it was about 20mm diameter) pipe that ran the length of the inlet manifold. So, it was quite a decent volume. There is a "tuning" balance to be found between the volume of the common plenum on such a thing and the diameter of the pipes running from it to the runners. You need the volume to be large enough to damp out the sharp spikes in pressure signal you get as each runner gets sucked on by its cylinder, but not so large that it becomes too slow to respond to actual changes in MAP. And you need the hoses to be small enough to transmit the signal quickly, but not so small that they delay the signal. You might have to have more than one go at it, if there isn't any actual success based wisdom to be had here. Hopefully there is. Anyway, I would not do it on only a couple of cylinders. I would also not care about "permanently modifying a part". Just bloody drill holes and make stuff better. There is nothing sacred about any GTR unless it is a genuine museum piece that you shouldn't be modifying at all anyway.
    • He's still joining you, he's just delayed it and won't have the fulleh sick ITBs...
    • The strange thing is this is a URAS front bumper (or clone of it). The bumper actually does not sit flush with the GTT hood - You need the addon to make the hood 'long' enough to reach the bumper. I have no idea why they didn't incorporate this piece into the bumper itself.. instead of sticking it to the hood instead.
    • Another thought on this OLD topic: When you paint your bonnet lip, leave a small unpainted back lip/line along the back of the lip, where it rests on the bumper. That way, the line in the back is much more prominent than the gaps in the front/under the lip - and it breaks the hood-to-bumper connection at the "correct" place, when comparing to a GTR. I'm gonna do this with mine this week, so stay tuned for pics!
    • So I'm in the final stages of assembling my single turbo RB30/26 and had a question regarding MAP reference points.  I've seen several recommendations such as tapping the cylinder 2/3 ITB, tapping the intake manifold at cylinder 2/3, or using a point on IAC. First two are doable but require permanently modify part and the third is "out" as I plan to delete the IAC.  All that to say my question is can I used the "bleeder" in the center of the ballance tube as a MAP Reference? I'm running a catch can so I don't need it for the PCV system. My thought process is it "pulls" from all 6 cylinder, and it's between the ITB and the cylinders making it ideal for MAP reference according to what I can find. Thoughts?
×
×
  • Create New...