Jump to content
SAU Community

SAU Market Research  

108 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Seems you have rather accurately portrayed the curve of normal distribution here lol. Slight negative skew (as per the skinny car nerd factor), but other than that looking good :)

lol @ statistics jokes.

XS all the way (no homo)... i hate baggy shirts

quote related;

"i wear tight tops that make me look bigger, so all the chicks can admire my figure"

Nah, I am not in the T-Shirt business but I see quite a few live shows / bands play and they all seem to use Gildan T-Shirts and Hoodies for their merchandise.

Then they print their designs on it.

I find the quality very good.

A well all round universal T-Shirt and Hoodie for whatever you need.

What's 6.1oz shirts. Hoodies too.

6.1 Ounces?

That's good advice, thanks mate : )

I've tried some samples from various other t-shirt producers and ahve found the quality really poor.

Tight fitting necks, long sleeves, poor washability etc.

Given the research i've done, it appears that these are a winner, time will tell.

And yes, 6.1oz, is the 6.1 ounce - 205 gram shirt. Not the lightest shirt, but not the thickest, i can't wait until they come in.

I'm a US "American Apparel" size S... which is apparently a XS at Jay Jays, but a S at Dangerfield and an M at Cotton On.

AFAIK American Apparel's is accepted as a global standard size due to market proliferation.

That's good advice, thanks mate : )

I've tried some samples from various other t-shirt producers and ahve found the quality really poor.

Tight fitting necks, long sleeves, poor washability etc.

Given the research i've done, it appears that these are a winner, time will tell.

And yes, 6.1oz, is the 6.1 ounce - 205 gram shirt. Not the lightest shirt, but not the thickest, i can't wait until they come in.

Interesting...

So it is a 6.1oz thick T-Shirt...

:) learnt something new today.

Holy Crap!

60 people have voted thus far! That's incredible! Thank you so much guys.

Another 40 votes and I will have a perfect indication.

Keep them coming guys, thanks again!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The trigger kit I have is similar to the one in the link below. While going through Facebook, I saw someone else mention a similar issue, and I’m starting to think this could be related to the crank gear itself. I understand these parts are CNC machined, but maybe some earlier versions or individual pieces might have slight inconsistencies—it just doesn’t look right in my case. https://www.facebook.com/share/16an8evZd9/?mibextid=wwXIfr I originally installed the crank gear using the thin OEM washer, but as shown in the attached photo, the timing belt walks very close to the edge. When I tried using a Nitto washer—which is thicker—it actually made the issue worse. The belt walks about 1mm off the front edge, which raises more concern about alignment.   I’ve gone through the full process of elimination:   The tensioner pulley and bolt are brand new and installed correctly. The bolt isn’t bent and is oriented properly. The back of the tensioner and the idler pulley are clean and seated correctly. The idler sits slightly more forward, which I understand is due to its design. I’ve experimented with both tight and loose belt tension, but it makes no difference. As soon as the engine runs, the belt immediately walks forward again—even if I reset it beforehand.     At this point, I’m considering replacing the crank gear with your Race Version 1 (12-tooth), but before purchasing, I wanted to ask:   Are you aware of any alignment issues when using this gear? Would this gear help keep the belt aligned correctly, or could the walking still occur? Does it work with a standard missing-tooth crank and rear washer? Is there any specific crank setup or install procedure required?     For reference, I’m not using a front washer, as the PRP crank gear seems to replace the need for one.   Looking forward to your advice.
    • Yep, looks that way. Never driven an E30 or R31 so I can only imagine  
    • Yuh, My new R34 box is sitting on the workshop floor (in its large shipping box, which is a nice thing on its own), along with a front plate to convert to push clutch. There was no way I was interested in rebuilding my existing one. Was only partly interested in the risk of buying a used one. But, if you want a 2nd hander, I can point you to one in/near Melbourne at least. @Komdotkom has one that should be in good enough condition to be usable. I don't think it's in a for sale thread, you'd have to message him. @redzedhas one that definitely needs a rebuild.
    • I used to love going to Amaroo to watch the HQ series go for broke (eventually stopped due to lack of spare parts) and also the Porsche series.  It was so cool to back your car up to nearly the edge of the viewing barrier and party with your friends, having a bbq and alcoholic/non drinks. It was such a family/mates atmosphere
×
×
  • Create New...