Jump to content
SAU Community

SAU Market Research  

108 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Seems you have rather accurately portrayed the curve of normal distribution here lol. Slight negative skew (as per the skinny car nerd factor), but other than that looking good :)

lol @ statistics jokes.

XS all the way (no homo)... i hate baggy shirts

quote related;

"i wear tight tops that make me look bigger, so all the chicks can admire my figure"

Nah, I am not in the T-Shirt business but I see quite a few live shows / bands play and they all seem to use Gildan T-Shirts and Hoodies for their merchandise.

Then they print their designs on it.

I find the quality very good.

A well all round universal T-Shirt and Hoodie for whatever you need.

What's 6.1oz shirts. Hoodies too.

6.1 Ounces?

That's good advice, thanks mate : )

I've tried some samples from various other t-shirt producers and ahve found the quality really poor.

Tight fitting necks, long sleeves, poor washability etc.

Given the research i've done, it appears that these are a winner, time will tell.

And yes, 6.1oz, is the 6.1 ounce - 205 gram shirt. Not the lightest shirt, but not the thickest, i can't wait until they come in.

I'm a US "American Apparel" size S... which is apparently a XS at Jay Jays, but a S at Dangerfield and an M at Cotton On.

AFAIK American Apparel's is accepted as a global standard size due to market proliferation.

That's good advice, thanks mate : )

I've tried some samples from various other t-shirt producers and ahve found the quality really poor.

Tight fitting necks, long sleeves, poor washability etc.

Given the research i've done, it appears that these are a winner, time will tell.

And yes, 6.1oz, is the 6.1 ounce - 205 gram shirt. Not the lightest shirt, but not the thickest, i can't wait until they come in.

Interesting...

So it is a 6.1oz thick T-Shirt...

:) learnt something new today.

Holy Crap!

60 people have voted thus far! That's incredible! Thank you so much guys.

Another 40 votes and I will have a perfect indication.

Keep them coming guys, thanks again!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just be warned that that turbo will not be a direct re-fit to the car. The exhaust housing is, of course, in the same place. It has to be - it's bolted to the exhaust manifold. So the dump will fit up. But the centre housing is not as long, so the comp housing will move backwards. This will affect both the turbo inlet and the outlet. There is fab work that needs to be done. Yes. it has one, it should have one. Paper gasket.
    • I only recently purchased the vehicle, it came with the flex setup but the current tune is e85 only, which is why im wanting to get the tune redone to enable a mixture.  First i need to get the exhaust redone tho. I was thinking of getting a varex muffler but it sems they dont fit well in the 33 (hang low because of the valve mechanism which sticks out on top) and generally dont sound good. So that leaves me with redoing the entire exhaust (more resonators and mufflers) so its not a menace when i come and go from home, and then have the aes dump valve somewhere along the line to really open it up. I was thinking of having it before the cat but after seeing how insanely loud it will be (on a vl turbo) im thinking of putting it more towards the rear of the car, after one of the resonators. 
    • At this point I'm just 'hoping' it's the turbo seals. I did speak to someone who said it's normal for these turbos to have a bit of axial play? Not gonna lie I've never checked a turbo for axial play before but you could hear it tapping a bit as I moved it back and forth. Surely that's too much? My theory is (could be completely wrong), bad axial play, worn bearings, bad seals, oil into dump/compressor side, burns in exhaust = blue smoke. On a timing belt related note, my crank pulley was missing that front plate that sits in front of the timing belt. It's that metal round plate. It did have the rear one, and the woodruff keys are in the crank which was nice. Can anyone confirm if the NEO det engine has a front plate, im sure it would to protect the front of the timing belt or something. Water pumps...the pump I got was an NPW (yes grill me if I should've got a genuine one lol). It has a smooth mating surface, kit came with a pretty pathetic looking paper gasket. Do I need to use any RTV or just trust the gasket will work because its a smooth mating surface? Cheers legends have a good Easter break!
    • Cheers man, I thought the same.   Bit of an update on it all. It was definitely blue smoke, not grey after all. It didn't really smell oily but it was blue after all. Also puffing just the smallest amount on idle with no throttle.   I ended up pulling the intake and exhaust off and there was around 3mm of axial play on the turbo shaft. So I figured we'll that's buggered and sent it off to get hi-flowed at hypergear. Haven't got it back yet.   I haven't compression tested it yet. Had a look in the cylinder and cylinder 1 spark plug, looked a bit sooty but not oily. Then I've just started doing my timing belt because it's age is unknown.
    • In that case it is probably stock. It lives in the navigator side footwell behind the plastic trim just in front of the a pillar.
×
×
  • Create New...