Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here's a link to an old article in Autospeed which shows that Toyota have been developing a VVT turbo with electric assist...quite an insightful article showing how it compares with other technologies.

http://autospeed.com/cms/A_108916/article....?popularArticle

I'd suggest they sort out their sticky accelerator issues first....a Camry with a sticking throttle and VVT turbo could be a handfull :ermm:

Edited by juggernaut1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317582-trends-in-turbo-technologies/
Share on other sites

Yeah very cool... I agree with the part where the writer talks about how turbochargers havnt (drastically) changed design in decades. Typical American engineering (think small block v8 - a design that's been used for more then half a century and only ever underwent small changes.), Garrett have only really made small changes in the last few decades of turbo engineering. If they followed suit from Toyota and started playing around with variable geometry, electric/mechanical assist, etc, we could have some interesting times ahead for us forced induction bretheren... But wait! Garrett is an American brand, so they're likely to use the same design for the next 50 years while the rest of the world is streaks ahead (again, think Chevrolet zr1/z06 vs gtr...)

It would suck if these new turbos still suffered the effects of cost cutting and came with journal bearings and ceramic wheels, although i think those days are over, as most new turbos are at least ball bearing...

Great read! Thanks!

Any development in turbo's is likely to come from from the manufacturers for numerous reasons....in order to meet lower emissions / make more power from smaller capacity motors / improve VE of an engine to reduce fuel consumption, etc / plus they have a ready market by equipping their cars with turbos.......as is evident in recent years with a resurgence of the use of turbo's in production cars.

Garrett and others couldn't care less about the above factors, and so I can't see any great inroads made by aftermarket turbo suppliers in turbo technology.

I rekon they need to rethink the whole turbo paradigm. Why not use the turbo to compress the air into canisters, which can then be injected literally straight into the cylinders, should make for some epic power given how cold the air would be :(

I rekon they need to rethink the whole turbo paradigm. Why not use the turbo to compress the air into canisters, which can then be injected literally straight into the cylinders, should make for some epic power given how cold the air would be :P

Been doin that for yeeeeeeaaaaars. It's called NOS :)

There are other methods available, for e.g. with twin scroll turbine housing all exhaust gases could go to 1 hole and then when the turbo reaches a certain psi a wastegate vents more gases into the second hole, its like a two stage a/r turbine housing.

Compound turbocharging is also used for a smaller turbo to spool the bigger turbo, done a lot on diesels but it means very high psi, very efficient in spooling huge turbos and very efficient in heating engines.

Anti lag by re-using exhaust gases or igniting fuel on idle.

Super turbo combos i think thats everything

Edited by 2lazy

There was a thread on here last year about someone who suppoesdly did a compound charger setup with a gt35 on his Rb30et, can't remember specifics though. Wonder exactly how useful it was though, because at the end of the day, just give the car enough revs and the powerband stays pretty linear if you don't go back below those revs again.

Yes I think a lot of development is going on behind the scenes with turbos for smallish "high speed" - for a diesel - oilers .

Actually a lot has changed with what Garrett has produced in the last 40 years , take a look at the old crude early 70s era T3 and even older 60s era T04B compressors and turbines . Then compare them to late 80s early 90s GT ones .

Most people don't get to see the huge range of OE turbos , really the aftermarket GT BBs are a very small part of what Garrett produces .

At times motor sport development drives turbo and turbo engine development , since the mid late 80s turbos were banned from F1 and many of the road racing classes eg Grp A .

The major manufacturers have fast disappeared from rallying and IMO WRC is just a bunch of kit cars on dirt .

If we ever see production based racing backed by the major manufacturers and forced induction allowed things may change .

ATM the manufacturers are very interested in reducing engine capacity chasing better consumption figures , forced induction is one way to get around the loss of torque from less cubes .

Interesting times , A .

garret already has one .

to get it small enough to work properly on a car itd have to be 48 volt . read it in a book thats like 2 years old

They "oem" have been talking about going to the 48v rail for years. I think they will just use charge pump circuits like they do for direct injection applications as the duty cycles require for turbo spool would be quite small.

Edited by rob82
can we get variable vane on petrol engines, I know that holset sells these, wonder if I could get one bolted onto a 3071r?mmmm

Porche GT2 twin turbo variable vane direct injection - think they went back to port injection on the latest model - couldn't be f**ked googling it.

Only prob with variable vanes turbos is the increase in heat in the turbo from around 700 to 1000 degrees in petrol applications.

Porsche use some fairly exotic stuff to keep the turbo together. Diesel applications run at much cooler temps and so exotic materials are not needed in this turbo format.

Nevertheless it would be awesome if variable vane turbos became commonplace in the aftermarket turbo world.

Edited by juggernaut1
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup. I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!
    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
×
×
  • Create New...