Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay guys, just a theoretical topic for some discussion.

My 34 GTT is currently in the shop getting a Haltech P2000, GT3076, 800cc injectors, clutch, fuel pump and all the rest - hoping for a 250rwkw daily 15psi and 300(ish)rwkw 20psi tune.

Now, my thoughts are turning to 0-100 km/h times.

Obviously this question is a bit like "how long is a piece of string" - depending on driver, tyres, road conditions etc etc but i thought it might prove interesting to hear other's thoughts (and if possible timed 0-100 times) from those that have or have driven 250-300 rwkw skylines.

The new XR6Ts apparently do 5.1 seconds all day long without the need to really stall it, while 34 GTRs (stock) can do 4.9 if banged off the rev limiter and dumped so I guess i'm interested in a comparison (not that i would give my 34 up for an XR6T - well at least not until the family requirements change and the 34 ends up as a track car!).

What does everyone think (or know...)?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317960-modified-skyline-0-100-times/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

If you can get a 250-300rwkw GTST/GTT to hold traction well off the line (good street tyres/semi slicks) a mid 4 second time should be fairly easy. Traction of the line is the hardest thing though, mine lights up 255 Toyos with ease at 3500rpm in first which becomes a problem. Would love to get it to hold first though, would be fantastic off the line.

Edited by PM-R33
If you can get a 250-300rwkw GTST/GTT to hold traction well off the line (good street tyres/semi slicks) a mid 4 second time should be fairly easy. Traction of the line is the hardest thing though, mine lights up 255 Toyos with ease at 3500rpm in first which becomes a problem. Would love to get it to hold first though, would be fantastic off the line.

And just a light launch, say just enough so you don't bog down - an easy 5s flat wouldn't be out of the question I assume?

I'd think that with that much power the pull towards the top of 1st and into 2nd should move it fairly quickly even without a great launch?

And speaking of tyres, does running a lower pressure on street tyres / rims (say 18s or 19s) make any difference to traction...?

Edited by gwilkinson34

it's all in the launch and car setup / suspension if you want low 0 too 100km/h

the one i did 4.88 was prefect launch with brand new pzero 255's and 190rwkw

the car had some basic suspension work, pineapple kit, camber, castor and bushes from memory

you need to get off the line with no wheelspin and grab 2nd as quick as you can when you top 1st

dont bother for 3rd, youll pass 100km/h before you top 2nd gear

for tyre pressure if you want off the line run 18-20psi in the rears and your acceleration will be quicker with smaller wheels, ie 17s instead of 19s

I was thinking of sticking some pzero 265/19/30s on but at $900 each that's getting a bit pricey... :D

Guess i'll see how bad it is when i get it back at the end of next week and decide how much $$$ i need to spend to get traction...!

I was thinking of sticking some pzero 265/19/30s on but at $900 each that's getting a bit pricey... :D

Guess i'll see how bad it is when i get it back at the end of next week and decide how much $$$ i need to spend to get traction...!

Once my Toyo's are a bit worn im going to try some KU36's and with some lower tyre pressure im hoping they will hold allright.

i think there would be a sweet spot for the fatest possible acceleration in 0 to 100km

after that, any more power at the rear just results in wheelspin / slower times

i think the std turbo and basic mods to 200rwkw is when the GTST is the quickest in 0 to 100

i think with sub 280rwkw it may be a touch slower with wheelspin

after 100km the 280rwkw+ would walk away

but 200rwkw with traction would nail it i reckon vs 280rwkw and wheelspin

Yeah I find that to be the case. With a complete stand still I struggle to get it off the line quickly just because it breaks out like a bitch. Anything from a slow roll on and it's great.

The key definetely is in trying to get the suspension and tyre setup in a sweet spot to get the power down as early as possible. Any slight wheel spin will kill the 0-100.

Edited by PM-R33

I guess you could always try not putting your foot to the floor in the 250kw+ Skyline and feeding it in..? Guess that can be a hard ask in the heat of the moment. Will have to see how i go next weekend i suppose...!

I don't want to get beaten by a fairly standard skyline (or a bloody WRX) after spending the amount I just have for 250-300kw so i might just get some damn good tyres...! :D

I guess your usual inner-city drag doesn't start off with a full on launch though anyway, it's usually the feel each other out through the first half of first, then once you both know you are going to go put the power down... Am I right to assume that in that situation the 250-300kw Skyline is going to leave the 200kw one, or the SS / XR8 / WRX in the dust (obviously that is then taking the launch out of it...)?

wheelspin is a bitch...ive got around 200rwkw i raced my mates s2000 he smoked me at the start since the hondas are light as a fether and my wheelspin was going like crazy.. raced a wrx when i dumped it on second wheelspin set me back.. yea sounds like im still a beginer in shifting.. :blush:

I guess you could always try not putting your foot to the floor in the 250kw+ Skyline and feeding it in..? Guess that can be a hard ask in the heat of the moment. Will have to see how i go next weekend i suppose...!

I don't want to get beaten by a fairly standard skyline (or a bloody WRX) after spending the amount I just have for 250-300kw so i might just get some damn good tyres...! :blush:

I guess your usual inner-city drag doesn't start off with a full on launch though anyway, it's usually the feel each other out through the first half of first, then once you both know you are going to go put the power down... Am I right to assume that in that situation the 250-300kw Skyline is going to leave the 200kw one, or the SS / XR8 / WRX in the dust (obviously that is then taking the launch out of it...)?

Lol,

When i have a go at someone at the lights, you usually know well before hand that it's on, so i just bring revs up to 7k and dump LOL.

Cheers,

Mitch.

I have recently tested mine with my ecutalk thingy and not sure how accurate it is.

With around 225rwkw i manages 5.5sec. Just had it tuned to e85 (250rwkw) and best time 5.75. Add another full second if i bog down a bit. My 5.5 run had fair bit of wheel spin in first. I could probably ride the clutch a bit to bring the times down but cant be stuffed. Tyres are 265 (cant remember brand) but at 30psi.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok now I’m extremely jealous 
    • Exactly, when searching online they were a lot more common on S13s, but have seen quite a few of Skyline GTSs with them as well.
    • Thanks for the feedback!   “Hard to say what the extra connector is, it looks a bit like a coax type connector, so possibly a separate radio/GPS antenna, or even another camera input?  The V37 series (including the Q50), did go through a model refresh in 2020, since Australia didn't get any Q50s newer than 2019, we didn't get any of the refreshed models, so there could also be other unexpected problems to overcome to swap an older Q50 head unit into a new model V37.” I wonder if the extra plug out has anything to do with the factory optioned drive recorder, or traffic updates. It looks like these systems link to the main screens too, and probably rv37 specific over Q50 perhaps?   “Regarding the TV standards, I assume you are referring to the AV inputs?  I haven't ever tried to use them, Japan used a slightly modified version of the US NTSC system, and Australia uses PAL for composite video, that said, I wouldn't be surprised if a video input could work with either system.  That is mostly irrelevant here though, unless you plan to use those inputs for something?” The car has a Japanese TV in it already. For compliance it will be disconnected I think.  From what I read it only works when the handbrake is engaged anyways, but an aftermarket module can be installed for use with handbrake not applied. I was more so curious if there was a way to convert the NTSC to PAL for Australian operation. (I don’t need it but it’s cool to have the gadgets working) I have a BNR34 MFD I converted years ago to take PAL signal in my skyline and I linked it to the DVD Head unit for dual screen use. There was some write up on SAU back in the day how to do it and I can’t remember what was involved. So sorta curious what can be done here etc.  “So, Pac posted in the other thread about a box that plugs into the USB C and gives you full Android OS to run whatever modern/connected nav you want on the top screen, and it still automatically switches back to function” The Rv37 model comes with Apple play and Android, I think the Q50 doesn’t? so for me I can simply plug my phone into the usb or maybe blue tooth and that will become it’s own Nav that way independent  I’m happy for this option but again figured if there was a factory module can it be used or updated.  It had SD card slot for map updates so I could update it if I can get AUS specific maps on it,   That alibaba screen does look neat.  I’m not ready to bust a move just yet on it or something like to as my car can take my Apple iPhone already.  Also it doesn’t say it suits current model Rv37 skylines but the Q50, so perhaps it may not be skyline compatible.  I’d love to see one installed to know first hand or even see one in Q50 and hear some feedback, is it cheap Chinese junk!? Is it good? Does it suit RHD? Is it internet compatible like a normal tablet, and will it support all rv37 specific options like map zoom and steering wheel control and Bose system and so on.. I’m certainly intrigued and interested       I’ve done some digging around.; my local Nissan has a tech guy ex Infiniti and he wants to try trick the nav unit into think it’s q50 so it takes Aussie software or something,  When it arrives I will take it there and see what he can do.    Also seems we no longer have Nissan connect app available in Australia now. I’ve read my dealer books etc at home and it seems in Japan via that app you can purchase internet plans for the rv37 skyline to work through the screens inside. it seems that you can get traffic updates, it links to ETC, and I believe the in car specific recorders. This video then is all stored and visible via app. the Nissan connect app can also be used for remotely starting and controlling heaters etc from afar. Seems tv was also part of this. I’ll have a further look and play when it arrives. (I wonder if I can somehow get the Japan version of Nissan connect on my phone and use the remote start features etc) App Store won’t allow it as region specific- need configure that one   rv37 has multiple security options and packages.  Premium package comes with tilt sensor, remote and battery in siren, and can be bundled with auto mirror retract when locked, door jam illumination when opened on drivers side only, and also remote start.  Otherwise all modules can be purchased separately and still applied but easier to do as a whole and bundle for shared hardware and looms. (This is where Nissan Japan have advised the security part needs a dealer device to set up). Australia dealers have advised me Australian delivered models weren’t offered factory optioned  security systems so they don’t really know what’s entailed and what device.  Nissan Japan state that the other components like mirror retract and door lighting and remote start should still work on that package even if security doesn’t (however security still may).  I’m tempted to purchase and take the risk on this. There’s a possibility it can be made to work by piggybacking off signals etc instead too.     im curious if any Q50 owners have a factory optioned security system with these options or just a factory optioned system. If so I’d imagine the same device or process for installation should be needed meaning someone with Q50 dealer Experience may know. (Waiting on my local tech to get back to quiz further here prior to ordering)   and like q50 some of the v37 models have the scuff panel illumination and the footwel illumination too.  I see 400R wasn’t compatible according to Nissan diagrams.  I’m guessing it didn’t have a plug out for this. Would be a nice addition… I wonder if anyone has this in a rv37 or q50 and has a wiring diagram or booklet for installation to know where to piggyback the system too.  Seems to activated by door opening, so if imagine it would grab a door ajar signal and 12v and earth and probably ignition, but curious to know more as it’s pretty much the only factory option the 400R doesn’t take.     Thanks for your inputs. I’m finding so little information rv37 skyline specific as apposed to Q50 so trying to pioneer forwards and see can and can’t work and what options are there to help.  I’ll keep updated when the car is landed and ready to play with on these things in the hope it helps others and my journey can assist.  Appreciate any input and help.  Cheers 
    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
×
×
  • Create New...